Peer Review and Medical Journals

被引:0
|
作者
Nugent, Kenneth [1 ,3 ]
Peterson, Christopher J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ Hlth Sci Ctr, Lubbock, TX USA
[2] Caril Med Ctr, Roanoke, VA USA
[3] Texas Tech Univ Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Internal Med, 3601 4th St, Lubbock, TX 79430 USA
关键词
medical publication; peer review; institutional responsibilities; DECLINE;
D O I
10.1177/21501319241252235
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Journal editors depend on peer reviewers to make decisions about submitted manuscripts. These reviewers help evaluate the methods, the results, the discussion of the results, and the overall organization and presentation of the manuscript. In addition, reviewers can help identify important mistakes and possible misconduct. Editors frequently have difficulty obtaining enough peer reviews which are submitted in a timely manner. This increases the workload of editors and journal managers and potentially delays the publication of clinical and research studies. This commentary discusses of the importance of peer reviews and make suggestions which potentially can increase the participation of academic faculty and researchers in this important activity.
引用
收藏
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biomedical journals probe peer review
    Hampton, T
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (18): : 2287 - 2288
  • [32] Shortcomings of peer review in biomedical journals
    Wager, E
    Jefferson, T
    LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2001, 14 (04) : 257 - 263
  • [33] THE JOURNALS PEER-REVIEW SYSTEM
    BARON, SN
    SMPTE JOURNAL, 1995, 104 (10): : 661 - 661
  • [34] The peer review process in health journals
    Vettore, Mario Vianna
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2009, 25 (11): : 2306 - 2306
  • [35] Frequency and patterns of editorial rejections (rejections without peer review) across medical journals
    Harikumar, Vishnu
    Reynolds, Kelly A.
    Christensen, Rachel E.
    Wan, Hoi Ting
    Winner, Rachael
    Ibrahim, Sarah A.
    Kang, Bianca Y.
    Fouque, Denis
    Poon, Emily
    Elston, Dirk M.
    Alam, Murad
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 87 (05) : 1127 - 1129
  • [36] Editorial peer review: A comparison of authors publishing in two groups of US medical journals
    Weller, AC
    BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 1996, 84 (03): : 359 - 366
  • [37] Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals
    Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
    Kitas, George D.
    CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (04) : 386 - 389
  • [38] Problems faced by editors of peer reviewed medical journals
    Jawaid, SA
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 25 : S21 - S25
  • [39] Conflict of interest in peer-reviewed medical journals
    Ferris, L. E.
    Fletcher, R. H.
    NOTFALL & RETTUNGSMEDIZIN, 2010, 13 (04): : 269 - 271
  • [40] Defining predatory journals: no peer review, no point
    Leonhard Dobusch
    Maximilian Heimstädt
    Katja Mayer
    Tony Ross-Hellauer
    Nature, 2020, 580 (7801) : 29 - 29