Indicator selection and density estimation deletion-based many-objective evolutionary algorithm

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang W. [1 ]
Liu J.-C. [1 ]
Tan S.-B. [1 ]
Liu Y.-C. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang
来源
Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision | 2023年 / 38卷 / 10期
关键词
convergence; density estimation-based deletion mechanism; diversity; indicator-based selection strategy; many-objective evolutionary algorithm;
D O I
10.13195/j.kzyjc.2021.1811
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although a variety of many-objective evolutionary algorithms have been proposed, the difficulty in balancing the convergence and diversity of the population still remains. To address this issue, we proposes an indicator selection and density estimation deletion-based many-objective evolautionary algorithm (MaOEA/IS-DED). In this algorithm, the selection strategy based on the begin{document}$I_{varepsilon+}(x, y)$end{document} indicator and the deletion mechanism based on shifted-based density estimation cooperate for deleting these individuals with poor convergence and diversity one by one, so that the proposed algorithm can make the population converge to the true Pareto front from search directions with good diversity and further achieve balance the converge and diversity. More specifically, the former is designed to find a pair of individuals with the minimum begin{document}$I_{varepsilon+}(x, y)$end{document} indicator values, which denotes these selected individuals have the most similar search directions in space. The latter utilizes own characteristic, taking the convergence and diversity of the population into account, to compare these selected individuals and delete the worse one. Experimental results demonstrate that the MaOEA/IS-DED can gain the highly competitive performance when solving many-objective optimization problems. Copyright ©2023 Control and Decision.
引用
收藏
页码:2805 / 2814
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [31] Deb K, Thiele L, Laumanns M, Et al., Scalable multi-objective optimization test problems, Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 825-830, (2002)
  • [32] Huband S, Hingston P, Barone L, Et al., A review of multiobjective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 10, 5, pp. 477-506, (2006)
  • [33] Cheng R, Li M Q, Tian Y, Et al., A benchmark test suite for evolutionary many-objective optimization, Complex & Intelligent Systems, 3, 1, pp. 67-81, (2017)
  • [34] Xiang Y, Zhou Y R, Li M Q, Et al., A vector angle-based evolutionary algorithm for unconstrained many-objective optimization, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 21, 1, pp. 131-152, (2017)
  • [35] Cai X J, Geng S J, Wu D, Et al., Unified integration of many-objective optimization algorithm based on temporary offspring for software defects prediction, Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 63, (2021)
  • [36] Ming F, Gong W Y, Wang L., A two-stage evolutionary algorithm with balanced convergence and diversity for many-objective optimization, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 3657, 99, pp. 1-13, (2022)
  • [37] Liang Z P, Luo T T, Hu K F, Et al., An indicator-based many-objective evolutionary algorithm with boundary protection, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 51, 9, pp. 4553-4566, (2021)