Comparison of single-phase convection in additive manufactured versus traditional metal foams

被引:0
|
作者
Broughton J. [1 ]
Joshi Y.K. [1 ]
机构
[1] G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 801 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, 30332, GA
来源
Journal of Heat Transfer | 2020年 / 142卷 / 08期
关键词
42;
D O I
10.1115/1.4046972Y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Metal foams have been often used for thermal management due to their favorable characteristics including high specific surface area (SSA), high thermal conductivity, and low relative density. However, they are accompanied by shortcomings including the significant contact resistances due to attachment method, as well as the need for characterization of foam parameters such as pore diameter and SSA. Additive manufactured (AM) metal foams would eliminate the substrate/foam thermal resistance, decrease the need for pre-usage characterization, and allow for tailoring structures, while also taking advantage of the characteristics of traditionally manufactured foams. A commercial, aluminum foam (nominally 5 pores per inch (PPI), 86.5% porosity) was analyzed using X-ray microcomputed tomography, and a custom-designed metal foam based on the cell diameter and porosity of the commercial sample was subsequently manufactured. Reduced domain computational fluid dynamics/heat transfer (CFD-HT) models were compared against experimental data. Postvalidation, the flow behavior, effect of varying attachment thermal conductivities, and thermal performance were numerically investigated, demonstrating the usefulness of validated pore-scale models, as well as the potential for improved performance using AM metal foams over traditionally manufactured foams. Copyright © 2020 by ASME.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison Among Single-phase PLLs Based on SOGI
    Kalkoul, Sami
    Benalla, Hocine
    Nabti, Khalil
    Reama, Abdellatif
    [J]. 2020 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRIC POWER AND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS (EPECS 2020), 2020, : 118 - 122
  • [32] Experimental assessment and comparison of single-phase versus two-phase liquid cooling battery thermal management systems
    Wu, Nan
    Chen, Yisheng
    Lin, Boshen
    Li, Junjie
    Zhou, Xuelong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2023, 72
  • [33] Multiphase CT angiography versus single-phase CT angiography: Comparison of image quality and radiation dose
    Yang, C. -Y.
    Chen, Y. -F.
    Lee, C. -W.
    Huang, A.
    Shen, Y.
    Wei, C.
    Liu, H. -M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2008, 29 (07) : 1288 - 1295
  • [34] Myocardial CT Perfusion Imaging in a Large Animal Model Comparison of Dynamic Versus Single-Phase Acquisitions
    Schwarz, Florian
    Hinkel, Rabea
    Baloch, Elisabeth
    Marcus, Roy P.
    Hildebrandt, Kristof
    Sandner, Torleif A.
    Kupatt, Christian
    Hoffmann, Verena
    Wintersperger, Bernd J.
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Theisen, Daniel
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Bamberg, Fabian
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2013, 6 (12) : 1229 - 1238
  • [35] Cooling analysis of a medical isotope production reactor: Single-phase natural convection
    Tong, W
    Ball, RM
    Stoudt, R
    [J]. NUMERICAL HEAT TRANSFER PART A-APPLICATIONS, 1997, 32 (05) : 503 - 515
  • [36] Experimental study of single-phase convection heat transfer in acoustic cavitation field
    Zhou, Ding-Wei
    Liu, Deng-Ying
    Hu, Xue-Gong
    [J]. Kung Cheng Je Wu Li Hsueh Pao/Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2002, 23 (01):
  • [37] A lightweight X-type metallic lattice in single-phase forced convection
    Yan, H. B.
    Zhang, Q. C.
    Lu, T. J.
    Kim, T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2015, 83 : 273 - 283
  • [39] AN ANALYSIS OF THE SINGLE-PHASE CONVECTION FLOW AND HEAT-TRANSFER AT POROUS CHANNELS
    GORTYSHOV, YF
    ASHIKHMIN, SR
    NADYROV, IN
    [J]. IZVESTIYA VYSSHIKH UCHEBNYKH ZAVEDENII AVIATSIONAYA TEKHNIKA, 1989, (04): : 31 - 35
  • [40] Forced convection heat transfer of single-phase binary mixtures through microchannels
    Peng, XF
    Peterson, GP
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE, 1996, 12 (01) : 98 - 104