Deep-learning performance in identifying and classifying dental implant systems from dental imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Chaurasia, Akhilanand [1 ]
Namachivayam, Arunkumar [2 ]
Koca-uensal, Revan Birke [3 ]
Lee, Jae-Hong [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] King Georges Med Univ, Dept Oral Med & Radiol, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Bapuji Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Biostat, Davengere, Karnataka, India
[3] Univ Kyrenia, Fac Dent, Dept Periodontol, Kyrenia, Cyprus
[4] Jeonbuk Natl Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Periodontol, Jeonju, South Korea
[5] Jeonbuk Natl Univ, Inst Oral Biosci, Jeonju, South Korea
[6] Jeonbuk Natl Univ, Jeonbuk Natl Univ Hosp, Res Inst Clin Med, Biomed Res Inst, Jeonju, South Korea
[7] Jeonbuk Natl Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Periodontol, 20 Baekje daero, Jeonju 54896, South Korea
来源
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Dental implants; Dental radiography; Systematic review; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.5051/jpis.2300160008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Deep learning (DL) offers promising performance in computer vision tasks and is highly suitable for dental image recognition and analysis. We evaluated the accuracy of DL algorithms in identifying and classifying dental implant systems (DISs) using dental imaging. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we explored the MEDLINE/ PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar databases and identified studies published between January 2011 and March 2022. Studies conducted on DL approaches for DIS identification or classification were included, and the accuracy of the DL models was evaluated using panoramic and periapical radiographic images. The quality of the selected studies was assessed using QUADAS-2. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRDCRD42022309624). From 1,293 identified records, 9 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The DL-based implant classification accuracy was no less than 70.75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.6%-75.9%) and no higher than 98.19 (95% CI, 97.8%-98.5%). The weighted accuracy was calculated, and the pooled sample size was 46,645, with an overall accuracy of 92.16% (95% CI, 90.8%-93.5%). The risk of bias and applicability concerns were judged as high for most studies, mainly regarding data selection and reference standards. DL models showed high accuracy in identifying and classifying DISs using panoramic and periapical radiographic images. Therefore, DL models are promising prospects for use as decision aids and decision-making tools; however, there are limitations with respect to their application in actual clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 12
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] What is the impact of bisphosphonate therapy upon dental implant survival? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ata-Ali, Javier
    Ata-Ali, Fadi
    Penarrocha-Oltra, David
    Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (02) : E38 - E46
  • [42] Deep-learning CT reconstruction in clinical scans of the abdomen: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mostafa A. Shehata
    Abdelrahman M. Saad
    Serageldin Kamel
    Nir Stanietzky
    Alicia M. Roman-Colon
    Ajaykumar C. Morani
    Khaled M. Elsayes
    Corey T. Jensen
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 2724 - 2756
  • [43] Deep-learning CT reconstruction in clinical scans of the abdomen: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shehata, Mostafa A.
    Saad, Abdelrahman M.
    Kamel, Serageldin
    Stanietzky, Nir
    Roman-Colon, Alicia M.
    Morani, Ajaykumar C.
    Elsayes, Khaled M.
    Jensen, Corey T.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (08) : 2724 - 2756
  • [44] Prevalence of traumatic dental injuries in emergency dental services: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    da Silva Lima, Thiago Cesar
    Coste, Sylvia Cury
    Avelar Pires Fernandes, Marina Izabelle
    Barbato-Ferreira, Daniela Augusta
    Colosimo, Enrico Antonio
    Del Fabbro, Massimo
    Ribeiro Sobrinho, Antonio Paulino
    de Souza Cortes, Maria Ilma
    Bastos, Juliana Vilela
    COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 51 (02) : 247 - 255
  • [45] Comparing short dental implant and standard dental implant in terms of marginal bone level changes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Bitaraf, Tahereh
    Keshtkar, Abbasali
    Rokn, Amir Reza
    Monzavi, Abbas
    Geramy, Allahyar
    Hashemi, Kazem
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (04) : 796 - 812
  • [46] MIH and Dental Caries in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Mazur, Marta
    Corridore, Denise
    Ndokaj, Artnora
    Ardan, Roman
    Vozza, Iole
    Babajko, Sylvie
    Jedeon, Katia
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (12)
  • [47] Dental implants in growing patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Elagib, Mohamed Fadul A.
    Alqaysi, Moayad Abdullah H.
    Almushayt, Mussab Omar S.
    Nagate, Raghavendra Reddy
    Gokhale, Shankar T.
    Chaturvedi, Saurabh
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2023, 31 (03) : 1051 - 1064
  • [48] Dental implants in patients with osteoporosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    de Medeiros, F. C. F. L.
    Kudo, G. A. H.
    Leme, B. G.
    Saraiva, P. P.
    Verri, F. R.
    Honorio, H. M.
    Pellizzer, E. P.
    Santiago Junior, J. F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 47 (04) : 480 - 491
  • [49] Obesity and dental caries in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hayden, Ceara
    Bowler, Jennifer O.
    Chambers, Stephanie
    Freeman, Ruth
    Humphris, Gerald
    Richards, Derek
    Cecil, Joanne E.
    COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 41 (04) : 289 - 308
  • [50] Dental implants in immunocompromised patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Duttenhoefer, Fabian
    Fuessinger, Marc Anton
    Beckmann, Yasmin
    Schmelzeisen, Rainer
    Groetz, Knut A.
    Boeker, Martin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2019, 5 (01)