Deep-learning performance in identifying and classifying dental implant systems from dental imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Chaurasia, Akhilanand [1 ]
Namachivayam, Arunkumar [2 ]
Koca-uensal, Revan Birke [3 ]
Lee, Jae-Hong [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] King Georges Med Univ, Dept Oral Med & Radiol, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Bapuji Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Biostat, Davengere, Karnataka, India
[3] Univ Kyrenia, Fac Dent, Dept Periodontol, Kyrenia, Cyprus
[4] Jeonbuk Natl Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Periodontol, Jeonju, South Korea
[5] Jeonbuk Natl Univ, Inst Oral Biosci, Jeonju, South Korea
[6] Jeonbuk Natl Univ, Jeonbuk Natl Univ Hosp, Res Inst Clin Med, Biomed Res Inst, Jeonju, South Korea
[7] Jeonbuk Natl Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Periodontol, 20 Baekje daero, Jeonju 54896, South Korea
来源
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Dental implants; Dental radiography; Systematic review; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.5051/jpis.2300160008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Deep learning (DL) offers promising performance in computer vision tasks and is highly suitable for dental image recognition and analysis. We evaluated the accuracy of DL algorithms in identifying and classifying dental implant systems (DISs) using dental imaging. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we explored the MEDLINE/ PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar databases and identified studies published between January 2011 and March 2022. Studies conducted on DL approaches for DIS identification or classification were included, and the accuracy of the DL models was evaluated using panoramic and periapical radiographic images. The quality of the selected studies was assessed using QUADAS-2. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRDCRD42022309624). From 1,293 identified records, 9 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The DL-based implant classification accuracy was no less than 70.75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.6%-75.9%) and no higher than 98.19 (95% CI, 97.8%-98.5%). The weighted accuracy was calculated, and the pooled sample size was 46,645, with an overall accuracy of 92.16% (95% CI, 90.8%-93.5%). The risk of bias and applicability concerns were judged as high for most studies, mainly regarding data selection and reference standards. DL models showed high accuracy in identifying and classifying DISs using panoramic and periapical radiographic images. Therefore, DL models are promising prospects for use as decision aids and decision-making tools; however, there are limitations with respect to their application in actual clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 12
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deep learning for classifying the stages of periodontitis on dental images: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xin Li
    Dan Zhao
    Jinxuan Xie
    Hao Wen
    Chunhua Liu
    Yajie Li
    Wenbin Li
    Songlin Wang
    BMC Oral Health, 23
  • [2] Deep learning for classifying the stages of periodontitis on dental images: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Xin
    Zhao, Dan
    Xie, Jinxuan
    Wen, Hao
    Liu, Chunhua
    Li, Yajie
    Li, Wenbin
    Wang, Songlin
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [3] Accuracy of Machine Learning in Identification of Dental Implant Systems in Radiographs - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Benakatti, Veena
    Nayakar, Ramesh P.
    Anandhalli, Mallikarjun
    Lagali-Jirge, Vasanti
    JOURNAL OF INDIAN ACADEMY OF ORAL MEDICINE AND RADIOLOGY, 2022, 34 (03) : 354 - 358
  • [4] Survival analysis of wide dental implant: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Chun-Teh
    Chen, Ya-Wei
    Starr, Jacqueline R.
    Chuang, Sung-Kiang
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (10) : 1251 - 1264
  • [5] The Effect of Antidepressants on Dental Implant Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Harutyunyan, Liza
    Lieuw, Kayla
    Yang, Bryan
    Lee, Eric
    Yeh, Yu-Ting
    Chen, Hsuan-Hung
    Lin, Guo-Hao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2024, 39 (05)
  • [6] Antibiotic Use in Dental Implant Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Torof, Elham
    Morrissey, Hana
    Ball, Patrick A. A.
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (04):
  • [7] ANTIRESORPTIVE THERAPY AND DENTAL IMPLANT OUTCOMES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Mirza, R. D.
    El-Rabbany, M.
    Ali, D. S.
    Guyatt, G.
    Morrison, A.
    Ruggiero, S. L.
    Tetradis, S.
    Khan, A. A.
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 34 (SUPPL 1) : S294 - S294
  • [8] The minipig intraoral dental implant model: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Musskopf, Marta Liliana
    Stadler, Amanda Finger
    Wikesjo, Ulf Me
    Susin, Cristiano
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (02):
  • [9] The impact of diabetes on dental implant failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Moraschini, V.
    Barboza, E. S. P.
    Peixoto, G. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 45 (10) : 1237 - 1245
  • [10] Deep learning for tooth identification and numbering on dental radiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sadr, Soroush
    Rokhshad, Rata
    Daghighi, Yasaman
    Golkar, Mohsen
    Tolooie Kheybari, Fateme
    Gorjinejad, Fatemeh
    Mataji Kojori, Atousa
    Rahimirad, Parisa
    Shobeiri, Parnian
    Mahdian, Mina
    Mohammad-Rahimi, Hossein
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 53 (01) : 5 - 21