Quality assurance for next-generation sequencing diagnostics of rare neurological diseases in the European Reference Network

被引:2
|
作者
Maver, Ales [1 ]
Lohmann, Katja [2 ]
Borovecki, Fran [3 ]
Wolstenholme, Nicola [4 ]
Taylor, Rachel L. [4 ]
Spielmann, Malte [5 ]
Haack, Tobias B. [6 ]
Gerberding, Matthias [6 ]
Peterlin, Borut [1 ]
Graessner, Holm [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Ljubljana, Clin Inst Genom Med, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[2] Univ Lubeck, Inst Neurogenet, Lubeck, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Ctr Zagreb, Dept Neurol, Zagreb, Croatia
[4] Manchester Sci Pk, EMQN CIC, Unit Enterprise Hse 4, Manchester, England
[5] Univ Lubeck, Inst Human Genet, Lubeck, Germany
[6] Univ Tubingen, Inst Med Genet & Appl Genom, Tubingen, Germany
[7] Univ Tubingen, Ctr Rare Dis, Tubingen, Germany
关键词
CLINICAL EXOME; GENETICS;
D O I
10.1038/s41431-024-01639-2
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In the past decade, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionised genetic diagnostics for rare neurological disorders (RND). However, the lack of standardised technical, interpretative, and reporting standards poses a challenge for ensuring consistent and high-quality diagnostics globally. To address this, the European Reference Network for Rare Neurological Diseases (ERN-RND) collaborated with the European Molecular Genetics Quality Network (EMQN) to establish an external quality assessment scheme for NGS-based diagnostics in RNDs. The scheme, initiated in 2021 with a pilot involving 29 labs and followed by a second round in 2022 with 42 labs, aimed to evaluate the performance of laboratories in genetic testing for RNDs. Each participating lab analysed genetic data from three hypothetical cases, assessing genotyping, interpretation, and clerical accuracy. Despite a majority of labs using exome or genome sequencing, there was considerable variability in gene content, sequencing quality, adherence to standards, and clinical guidance provision. Results showed that while most labs provided correct molecular diagnoses, there was significant variability in reporting technical quality, adherence to interpretation standards, reporting strategies, and clinical commentary. Notably, some labs returned results with the potential for adverse medical outcomes. This underscores the need for further harmonisation, guideline development, and external quality assessment in the evolving landscape of genomic diagnostics for RNDs. Overall, the experience with the scheme highlighted the generally good quality of participating labs but emphasised the imperative for ongoing improvement in data analysis, interpretation, and reporting to enhance patient safety.
引用
收藏
页码:1014 / 1021
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using next-generation sequencing as a diagnostic tool in rare neurological Mendelian disorders
    Jiang, H.
    Chen, Z.
    Wang, J.
    Tang, B.
    Sun, Z.
    Shi, Y.
    Shen, L.
    Hu, Z.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2013, 28 : S410 - S411
  • [22] Next-generation sequencing in neuromuscular diseases
    Efthymiou, Stephanie
    Manole, Andreea
    Houlden, Henry
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, 2016, 29 (05) : 527 - 536
  • [23] Next-generation DNA sequencing in clinical diagnostics
    Lacoste, C.
    Fabre, A.
    Pecheux, C.
    Levy, N.
    Krahn, M.
    Malzac, P.
    Bonello-Palot, N.
    Badens, C.
    Bourgeois, P.
    ARCHIVES DE PEDIATRIE, 2017, 24 (04): : 373 - 383
  • [24] Next-Generation Sequencing in Diagnostics and Clinical Research
    Hoefler, Gerald
    PATHOBIOLOGY, 2017, 84 (06) : 289 - 291
  • [25] Next-generation sequencing applied to molecular diagnostics
    Natrajan, Rachael
    Reis-Filho, Jorge S.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2011, 11 (04) : 425 - 444
  • [26] NEMHESYS-European Perspective on the Implementation of Next-generation Sequencing Into Clinical Diagnostics
    Serramito-Gomez, Inmaculada
    Clarke, Kathryn M.
    Rodriguez-Vicente, Ana Eugenia
    McGimpsey, Julie E.
    Abaigar, Maria
    Diez, Carlos Barranquero
    Benito, Rocio
    Bullinger, Lars
    Mills, Ken I.
    Hernandez Rivas, Jesus Maria
    HEMASPHERE, 2021, 5 (03): : E541
  • [27] Operationalizing Quality Assurance for Clinical Illumina Somatic Next-Generation Sequencing Pipelines
    Bridgers, Joshua
    Alexander, Kenyon
    Karsan, Aly
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 26 (02): : 96 - 105
  • [28] Diagnostics of rare diseases with next generation sequencing-arrived at the patients or rejected?
    Abicht, Angela
    Neuhann, Teresa
    Mehnert, Laura
    Rost, Imma
    Reis, Andre
    Zweier, Christiane
    Holinski-Feder, Elke
    MEDIZINISCHE GENETIK, 2019, 31 (03) : 335 - 343
  • [29] Reference Samples to Compare Next-Generation Sequencing Test Performance for Oncology Therapeutics and Diagnostics
    Pfeifer, John D. r
    Loberg, Robert
    Lofton-Day, Catherine
    Zehnbauer, Barbara A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2022, 157 (04) : 628 - 638
  • [30] Quality Guidelines for Next-Generation Sequencing
    Baudhuin, Linnea M.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 59 (05) : 858 - 859