Exploring the causes of COPD misdiagnosis in primary care: A mixed methods study

被引:1
|
作者
Patel, Ketan [1 ]
Smith, Daniel J. [2 ]
Huntley, Christopher C. [1 ]
Channa, Sunita D. [3 ]
Pye, Anita [3 ]
Dickens, Andrew P. [4 ]
Gale, Nicola [5 ]
Turner, Alice M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Birmingham, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham, England
[4] Observat & Pragmat Res Inst, Midview City, Singapore
[5] Univ Birmingham, Sch Social Policy, Birmingham, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0298432
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Within primary care there exists a cohort of patients misdiagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Misdiagnosis can have a detrimental impact on healthcare finances and patient health and so understanding the factors leading to misdiagnosis is crucial in order to reduce misdiagnosis in the future. The objective of this study is to understand and explore the perceived causes of COPD misdiagnosis in primary care.Methods A sequential mixed methods study, quantifying prevalence and features of patients misdiagnosed with COPD in primary care followed by a qualitative analysis to explore perceived causes of misdiagnosis. Quantitative data was collected for 206 patients identified as misdiagnosed with COPD within the INTEGR COPD study (NCT03482700). Qualitative data collected from 21 healthcare professionals involved in providing COPD care and 8 misdiagnosed patients who were recruited using a maximum variation purposive sampling.Results Misinterpretation of spirometry results was the prevailing factor leading to patients initially being misdiagnosed with COPD, affecting 59% of misdiagnosed patients in this cohort. Of the 99 patients who were investigated for their underlying diagnosis; 41% had normal spirometry and 40% had asthma. Further investigation through qualitative methodology uncovered reluctance to challenge historical misdiagnoses and challenges in differential diagnosis as the underlying explanations for COPD misdiagnosis in this cohort.Conclusions Patients historically diagnosed with COPD without spirometric evidence are at risk of remaining labelled and treated for COPD despite non-obstructive respiratory physiology, leading to a persistent cohort of patients misdiagnosed with COPD in primary care. The lack of spirometry services during and after the COVID19 pandemic in primary care risks adding to the cohort of misdiagnosed patients. Support from respiratory specialists can potentially help to reduce the prevalence of COPD misdiagnosis in primary care.Trial registration NCT03482700.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Implementation of a palliative care intervention for patients with COPD - a mixed methods process evaluation of the COMPASSION study
    Broese, Johanna M. C.
    van der Kleij, Rianne M. J. J.
    Verschuur, Els M. L.
    Kerstjens, Huib A. M.
    Engels, Yvonne
    Chavannes, Niels H. H.
    [J]. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [32] Implementation of a palliative care intervention for patients with COPD – a mixed methods process evaluation of the COMPASSION study
    Johanna M. C. Broese
    Rianne M. J. J. van der Kleij
    Els M. L. Verschuur
    Huib A. M. Kerstjens
    Yvonne Engels
    Niels H. Chavannes
    [J]. BMC Palliative Care, 21
  • [33] Implementation of an Acute Care COPD Exacerbation Patient Mobilization Tool A Mixed-Methods Study
    Camp, Pat G.
    Benari, Ori
    Dechman, Gail
    Kirkham, Ashley
    Campbell, Kristin
    Black, Agnes
    Chung, Frank
    Dajee, Preeya
    Ellis, Amy
    Hoens, Alison M.
    Jones, Rosalyn
    Parappilly, Beena
    Singh, Chiara
    Sweeney, Philip
    Woo, Ellen
    [J]. ATS SCHOLAR, 2021, 2 (02): : 249 - 264
  • [34] Exploring and Overcoming the Challenges Primary Care Practices Face with Care Management of High-Risk Patients in CPC+: a Mixed-Methods Study
    Tricia Collins Higgins
    Ann S. O’Malley
    Rosalind E. Keith
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2021, 36 : 3008 - 3014
  • [35] Patient perspectives of diabetes care in primary care networks in Singapore: a mixed-methods study
    Lay Hoon Goh
    Anna Szücs
    Chiew Jiat Rosalind Siah
    Monica A Lazarus
    E Shyong Tai
    Jose M Valderas
    Doris Yee Ling Young
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [36] Exploring and Overcoming the Challenges Primary Care Practices Face with Care Management of High-Risk Patients in CPC plus : a Mixed-Methods Study
    Higgins, Tricia Collins
    O'Malley, Ann S.
    Keith, Rosalind E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (10) : 3008 - 3014
  • [37] Case Management in Primary Care for Frequent Users of Health Care Services: A Mixed Methods Study
    Hudon, Catherine
    Chouinard, Maud-Christine
    Dubois, Marie-France
    Roberge, Pasquale
    Loignon, Christine
    Tchouaket, Eric
    Lambert, Mireille
    Hudon, Emilie
    Diadiou, Fatoumata
    Bouliane, Danielle
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2018, 16 (03) : 232 - 239
  • [38] Exploring the Benefits of Telemental Health Care for Asian New Zealanders: A Mixed Methods Study
    Yan Chen
    Rodrigo Ramalho
    Blake Yue
    Bo Ning
    Kelly Feng
    Gary Cheung
    [J]. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 2024, 9 (3) : 486 - 495
  • [39] Primary health care preparedness to integrate diabetes care in Blantyre, Malawi: A mixed methods study
    Banda, Chimwemwe K.
    Banda, Ndaziona P. K.
    Gombachika, Belinda T.
    Nyirenda, Moffat J.
    Hosseinipour, Mina C.
    Muula, Adamson S.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05):
  • [40] EARLY IMPLEMENTATION OF A COLLABORATIVE CARE MODEL FOR DEPRESSION IN PRIMARY CARE: A LONGITUDINAL MIXED METHODS STUDY
    Fu, Emily
    Carroll, Allison J.
    Rado, Jeffrey
    Rosenthal, Lisa
    Atlas, Jacob A.
    Burnett-Zeigler, Inger
    Jordan, Neil
    Csernansky, John
    Smith, J. D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2021, 55 : S167 - S167