Surface Roughness Prediction and Multi-Objective Optimization of Honing Cylinder Liner

被引:0
|
作者
Lü Y. [1 ,2 ]
Li J. [1 ,2 ]
Jiang C. [1 ,2 ]
Li P. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang Y. [3 ]
Chang H. [3 ]
机构
[1] School of Mechanical and Precision Instrument Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Shaanxi, Xi’an
[2] State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi, Xi’an
[3] School of Printing, Packaging Engineering and Digital Media Technology, Xi’an University of Technology, Shaanxi, Xi’an
来源
Mocaxue Xuebao/Tribology | 2022年 / 42卷 / 04期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
honing process; multi-objective optimization; neural networks; response surface methodology; roughness prediction;
D O I
10.16078/j.tribology.2021131
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The surface machining quality of cylinder liner is usually evaluated by surface roughness Rk set, it is of great significance to establish a prediction model between roughness Rk set and machining parameters, and analyze the influence of machining parameters on honing quality of cylinder liner. Based on the rough honing experiments on cylinder liner under different honing pressure (P), different honing head rotation speed (VR) and different reciprocating speed (VRe), the values of the surface roughness Rk set were obtained. In order to predict the Rk, Rpk and Rvk of the surface roughness Rk set of the inner bore of cylinder liner during the rough honing process, and to optimize the honing parameters, the P, VR and VRe were taken as decision variables, and Rk roughness set was taken as the object response, multi-objective optimization was implemented to obtain the optimal machining parameters of P, VR and VRe. The roughness prediction models based on generalized regression neural network (GRNN) and response surface methodology (RSM) were established respectively. For the GRNN method, it was necessary to use the K-fold cross validation method to optimize the smoothing factor (i.e., spread), the value of the smoothing factor can greatly affect the prediction performance of the network. The minimum MSE can be obtained in the process of five-fold cross validation, the smoothing factor was 0.01 when the MSE had the minimum value. Twenty-one groups of experiment data were trained to achieve the prediction model by GRNN, and other 6 groups were regarded as test samples to verify the accuracy of the proposed model. The Box-Behnken Design (BBD) method of response surface method was used to design the experiment, and 17 groups of experiments were conducted to establish the response relationship between the honing parameters and the surface roughness Rk set. The surface roughness Rk set can be predicted by the optimized regression models based on RSM. And comparing with a full factorial honing test with three factors and three levels, the result showed that the prediction results obtained by the proposed models were in good agreement with the experimental results. The mean value of R2 of the coefficient of determination of GRNN prediction model was 0.959, the mean value of R2 of the coefficient of determination of the multiple regression prediction model established by RSM was 0.963. Comparing with the multiple regression prediction model established by RSM, the GRNN prediction model had higher prediction accuracy and smaller prediction error for prediction of Rk and Rpk, and R2 of Rk and Rpk increased by 0.025 and 0.020 respectively. The multiple regression model established by RSM was better than the GRNN prediction model when predicting Rvk, and R2 increased by 0.057. The influence significance of three decision variables on the roughness was analyzed by the RSM, and the ranking result for Rk was VRe > P > VR, for Rpk was P > VRe > VR, for Rvk was P > VRe > VR.In order to select the appropriate values of P, VR and VRe to make the Rk roughness set relatively small, based on the regression model established by the RSM, a multi-objective optimization was implemented to obtain the Pareto front of the Pareto optimal solutions by combining the multiple regression models with NSGA-II (non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II) optimization algorithm. More machining parameters combinations for rough honing of cylinder liner were provided to get high honing quality. Eight groups of optimum roughness values and the corresponding rough honing parameters of cylinder liner were given. © 2022 Science Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:728 / 741
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dynamic multi-objective optimization algorithm based on individual prediction
    Wang W.-L.
    Chen Z.-K.
    Wu F.
    Wang Z.
    Yu M.-J.
    [J]. Zhejiang Daxue Xuebao (Gongxue Ban)/Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2023, 57 (11): : 2133 - 2146
  • [42] Multi-Objective Optimization of Biological Networks for Prediction of Intracellular Fluxes
    Sendin, Jose-Oscar H.
    Alonso, Antonio A.
    Banga, Julio R.
    [J]. 2ND INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND BIOINFORMATICS (IWPACBB 2008), 2009, 49 : 197 - 205
  • [43] Penalty and prediction methods for dynamic constrained multi-objective optimization
    Wang, Fengxia
    Huang, Min
    Yang, Shengxiang
    Wang, Xingwei
    [J]. SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2023, 80
  • [44] Use of multi-objective optimization for digital human posture prediction
    Marler, R. Timothy
    Arora, Jasbir S.
    Yang, Jingzhou
    Kim, Hyung-Joo
    Abdel-Malek, Karim
    [J]. ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2009, 41 (10) : 925 - 943
  • [45] Multi-objective optimization of empirical hydrological model for streamflow prediction
    Guo, Jun
    Zhou, Jianzhong
    Lu, Jiazheng
    Zou, Qiang
    Zhang, Huajie
    Bi, Sheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2014, 511 : 242 - 253
  • [46] Dynamic multi-objective optimization algorithm based on prediction strategy
    Li, Er-Chao
    Ma, Xiang-Qi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DISCRETE MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES & CRYPTOGRAPHY, 2018, 21 (02): : 411 - 415
  • [47] The effect of diversity maintenance on prediction in dynamic multi-objective optimization
    Ruan, Gan
    Yu, Guo
    Zheng, Jinhua
    Zou, Juan
    Yang, Shengxiang
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 58 : 631 - 647
  • [48] Feature Selection for Bankruptcy Prediction: A Multi-Objective Optimization Approach
    Mendes, Fernando
    Duarte, Joao
    Vieira, Armando
    Gaspar-Cunha, Antonio
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING IN INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS - ALGORITHMS, INTEGRATION, AND SUCCESS STORIES, 2010, 75 : 109 - +
  • [49] Multi Objective Optimization of Surface Roughness and Workpiece Surface Temperature in Turning Operation
    Nooraziah, Ahmad
    Tiagrajah, V. Janahiraman
    [J]. MECHANICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING, 2014, 554 : 376 - +
  • [50] MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION OF ROUGHNESS AND REMOVAL RATE BY NORMAL BOUNDARY INTERSECTION METHOD
    Martins Duarte, Danielle Costa
    Amorim, Gabriela Fonseca
    de Paiva, Anderson Paulo
    Balestrassi, Pedro Paulo
    Goncalves, Tarcisio
    Amaury Mendes, Rona Rinston
    [J]. M2D2015: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICS AND MATERIALS IN DESIGN, 2015, : 1545 - 1546