A Study of Sustainability Concepts for Developing Green Universities in Thailand

被引:0
|
作者
Aregarot, Preecha [1 ]
Kubaha, Kuskana [1 ]
Chiarakorn, Siriluk [2 ]
机构
[1] King Mongkuts Univ Technol Thonburi, Sch Energy Environm & Mat, Energy Management Technol Program, 126 Pracha Uthit Rd, Thung Khru 10140, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] King Mongkuts Univ Technol Thonburi, Environm Technol Program, Sch Energy Environm & Mat, 126 Pracha Uthit Rd, Thung Khru, 10140, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
sustainability; green university; indicators; analytic hierarchy process; weighted arithmetic mean; EFFICIENCY; BARRIERS; SYSTEMS; DRIVERS; INDEX;
D O I
10.3390/su16072892
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Developing universities to become green and sustainable universities is important. This is in line with the world's sustainable development guidelines. In developing a university towards being green and sustainable, different sustainability assessment criteria have been used, including the UI GreenMetric, GRI, STARS, AUN, THE'S Impact Ranking, and AISHE. Each criterion is designed in a broad-spectrum manner that is not specific. Therefore, this research aims to develop sustainable and green university assessment indicators that suit the national context in Thailand, both in terms of the size and location of universities. Based on the criteria from the UI GreenMetric, there are six categories, totaling 51 indicators. Thus, this study aims to analyze the weaknesses and strengths of each indicator using a questionnaire distributed by the Sustainable University Network of Thailand to all 36 universities and to organize a meeting with sustainability experts (focus group) in each area. To obtain appropriate indicators and to prioritize each indicator, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and weighted arithmetic mean (WAM) method were used to develop an index of sustainability assessment criteria (GU SI) suitable for the Thai context. The results of this study show that the newly developed GU SI comprises seven aspects, including a total of 27 indicators. These are criteria that can be used to assess the sustainability of small, medium, and large universities. They are not complex, are straightforward to use, and more importantly reflect the Thai context. By applying these new sustainability assessment criteria, it was found that the universities sampled in this study yielded significantly high scores. This study is limited by its application of sustainability assessments to only universities in Thailand. Though there are different contexts across different Thai universities, the proposed indicators can still be used to evaluate the sustainability of universities in Thailand.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Developing key sustainability indicators for assessing green infrastructure performance
    Pakzad, Parisa
    Osmond, Paul
    Corkery, Linda
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL HIGH-PERFORMANCE BUILT ENVIRONMENT CONFERENCE - A SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT CONFERENCE 2016 SERIES (SBE16), IHBE 2016, 2017, 180 : 146 - 156
  • [22] Developing a sustainability indicator set for measuring green infrastructure performance
    Pakzad, Parisa
    Osmond, Paul
    [J]. URBAN PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (UPADSD), 2016, 216 : 68 - 79
  • [23] Bridging digitalization and sustainability in universities: A Chinese green university initiative in the digital era
    Zou, Yonghua
    Zhong, Ni
    Chen, Ziwei
    Zhao, Wanxia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 469
  • [24] The Fiscal Hedging and Green Financing: Sustainability Challenges for Developing World
    Chunyu, Leng
    Ali, Syed Ahtsham
    Tan, Ci
    Yin, Weihua
    Kouser, Robina
    Gulzar, Fatima
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [25] Fostering Green Banking and sustainability in a Developing Economy: An Empirical Assessment
    Salman, Sohnia
    Hamid, Sumaira
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORGANISATIONAL STUDIES AND INNOVATION, 2018, 5 (01): : 21 - 38
  • [26] Sustainability at Universities as a Determinant of Entrepreneurship for Sustainability
    Fanea-Ivanovici, Mina
    Baber, Hasnan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [27] The challenge of sustainability and integrated reporting at universities: A case study
    Brusca, Isabel
    Labrador, Margarita
    Larran, Manuel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 188 : 347 - 354
  • [28] ISO 14001 and sustainability at universities: a Mexican case study
    Taddei-Bringas, Jorge L.
    Esquer-Peralta, Javier
    Platt-Carrillo, Alberto
    [J]. MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2008, 19 (05) : 613 - +
  • [29] A proposal for measuring sustainability in universities: a case study of Spain
    Larran Jorge, Manuel
    Herrera Madueno, Jesus
    Calzado, Yolanda
    Andrades, Javier
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 17 (05) : 671 - 697
  • [30] Incorporating sustainability in engineering curriculum: a study of the Australian universities
    Arefin, Md. Arman
    Nabi, Md. Nurun
    Sadeque, Saalem
    Gudimetla, Prasad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 22 (03) : 576 - 598