Hitting the target and missing the point? A BEME systematic review of evidence regarding the efficacy of statutory and mandatory training in health and care: BEME Guide No. 87

被引:0
|
作者
Ashley, Helen [1 ,6 ]
Gough, Suzanne [2 ]
Darlington, Carol [3 ]
Clark, Justin [4 ]
Mosley, Chiara [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, People & Org Dev, Manchester, England
[2] Bond Univ, Fac Hlth Sci & Med, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[3] Mid Cheshire Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Emergency Med, Crewe, Cheshire, England
[4] Bond Univ, Inst Evidence Based Healthcare, Robina, Qld, Australia
[5] Mid Cheshire Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Workforce Transformat, Crewe, Cheshire, England
[6] Univ Manchester, Manchester, England
关键词
Best evidence medical education; methods; mandatory training; statutory training; STAFF; RESUSCITATION; PARTICIPATION; INDUCTION; OUTCOMES; DESIGN; IMPACT; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1080/0142159X.2024.2331048
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Mandatory training is considered fundamental to establishing and maintaining high standards of professional practice. There is little evidence however, of the training either achieving its required learning outcomes, or delivering improvement in outcomes for patients. Whist organisations may be hitting their compliance target for mandatory training, is the purpose missing the point? This systematic review aims to synthesize and evaluate the efficacy of statutory and mandatory training. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, CNAHL, ERIC and Cochrane Central registers were searched on 23rd May 2023. All research designs were included and reported training had to specify an organisational mandate within a healthcare setting. Data was coded using a modified Kirkpatrick (KP) rating system. Critical appraisal was undertaken using the Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument, Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Studies checklist and Mixed Methods Assessment Tool. Results: Twenty-five studies were included, featuring 9132 participants and 1348 patient cases audited. Studies described evaluation of mandatory training according to Kirkpatrick's outcomes levels 1-4b, with the majority (68%) undertaken in the UK and within acute settings. Training duration varied from 5 min to 3 days. There is a lack of consensus regarding mandatory training rationale, core topics, duration, and optimum refresher training period. Currently, mandatory training does not consistently translate to widescale improvements in safe practice or improved patient outcomes. Conclusions: Due to the lack of international consensus regarding the need for mandated training, most papers originated from countries with centrally administered national health care systems. The rationale for mandating training programmes remains undefined. The assumption that mandatory training is delivering safe practice outcomes is not supported by studies included in this review. The findings of this review offer a basis for further research to be undertaken to assist with the design, facilitation, and impact of mandatory training.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [21] Are journal clubs effective in supporting evidence-based decision making? A systematic review. BEME Guide No. 16.
    Harris, Janet
    Kearley, Karen
    Heneghan, Carl
    Meats, Emma
    Roberts, Nia
    Perera, Rafael
    Kearley-Shiers, Katharine
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2011, 33 (01) : 9 - 23
  • [22] Conducting a best evidence systematic review. Part 1: From idea to data coding. BEME Guide No. 13
    Hammick, Marilyn
    Dornan, Timothy
    Steinert, Yvonne
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2010, 32 (01) : 3 - 15
  • [23] Test-enhanced learning in health professions education: A systematic review: BEME Guide No. 48 (vol 40, pg 337, 2018)
    Green, M. L.
    Moeller, J. J.
    Spak, J. M.
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2022, 44 (06) : I - I
  • [24] Teaching musculoskeletal clinical skills to medical trainees and physicians: A Best Evidence in Medical Education systematic review of strategies and their effectiveness: BEME Guide No. 18
    O'Dunn-Orto, Alexandra
    Hartling, Lisa
    Campbell, Sandra
    Oswald, Anna E.
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2012, 34 (02) : 93 - 102
  • [25] A Best Evidence in Medical Education systematic review to determine the most effective teaching methods that develop reflection in medical students: BEME Guide No. 51
    Uygur, Jane
    Stuart, Ellen
    De Paor, Muireann
    Wallace, Emma
    Duffy, Seamus
    O'Shea, Marie
    Smith, Susan
    Pawlikowska, Teresa
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2019, 41 (01) : 3 - 16