Shortening Acquisition Time and Improving Image Quality for Pelvic MRI Using Deep Learning Reconstruction for Diffusion-Weighted Imaging at 1.5 T

被引:4
|
作者
Herrmann, Judith [1 ]
Benkert, Thomas [1 ]
Brendlin, Andreas [1 ]
Gassenmaier, Sebastian [1 ]
Hoelldobler, Thomas [1 ]
Maennlin, Simon [1 ]
Almansour, Haidara [1 ]
Lingg, Andreas [1 ]
Weiland, Elisabeth [1 ]
Afat, Saif [1 ]
机构
[1] Eberhard Karls Univ Tuebingen, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Hoppe Seyler Str 3, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
Diffusion-weighted imaging; Pelvic imaging; MRI; Deep learning reconstruction; SUPERRESOLUTION; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2023.06.035
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: To determine the impact on acquisition time reduction and image quality of a deep learning (DL) reconstruction for accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the pelvis at 1.5 T compared to standard DWI. Materials and Methods: A total of 55 patients (mean age, 61 +/- 13 years; range, 27-89; 20 men, 35 women) were consecutively included in this retrospective, monocentric study between February and November 2022. Inclusion criteria were (1) standard DWI (DWIS) in clinically indicated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 T and (2) DL-reconstructed DWI (DWIDL). All patients were examined using the institution's standard MRI protocol according to their diagnosis including DWI with two different b-values (0 and 800 s/mm(2)) and calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Image quality was qualitatively assessed by four radiologists using a visual 5-point Likert scale (5 = best) for the following criteria: overall image quality, noise level, extent of artifacts, sharpness, and diagnostic confidence. The qualitative scores for DWIS and DWIDL were compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: The overall image quality was evaluated to be significantly superior in DWIDL compared to DWIS for b = 0 s/mm(2), b = 800 s/mm(2), and ADC maps by all readers (P < .05). The extent of noise was evaluated to be significantly less in DWIDL compared to DWIS for b = 0 s/mm(2), b = 800 s/mm(2), and ADC maps by all readers (P < .001). No significant differences were found regarding artifacts, lesion detectability, sharpness of organs, and diagnostic confidence (P > .05). Acquisition time for DWIS was 2:06 minutes, and simulated acquisition time for DWIDL was 1:12 minutes. Conclusion: DL image reconstruction improves image quality, and simulation results suggest that a reduction in acquisition time for diffusion-weighted MRI of the pelvis at 1.5 T is possible.
引用
收藏
页码:921 / 928
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Deep learning reconstruction in pediatric brain MRI: comparison of image quality with conventional T2-weighted MRI
    Kim, Soo-Hyun
    Choi, Young Hun
    Lee, Joon Sung
    Lee, Seul Bi
    Cho, Yeon Jin
    Lee, Seung Hyun
    Shin, Su-Mi
    Cheon, Jung-Eun
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2023, 65 (01) : 207 - 214
  • [42] Deep learning reconstruction in pediatric brain MRI: comparison of image quality with conventional T2-weighted MRI
    Soo-Hyun Kim
    Young Hun Choi
    Joon Sung Lee
    Seul Bi Lee
    Yeon Jin Cho
    Seung Hyun Lee
    Su-Mi Shin
    Jung-Eun Cheon
    Neuroradiology, 2023, 65 : 207 - 214
  • [43] Deep learning reconstruction of diffusion-weighted brain MRI for evaluation of patients with acute neurologic symptoms
    Park, Sang Ik
    Yim, Younghee
    Lee, Jung Bin
    Ahn, Hye Shin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [44] Deep learning can reduce acquisition time of T2-weighted image in brain imaging
    El-Saeed Abou-ELMagd, Eman Hassan
    Elmogy, Sabry Alameldin
    Abdelzaher, Dina Gamal
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2025, 56 (01):
  • [45] Efficacy of compressed sensing and deep learning reconstruction for adult female pelvic MRI at 1.5 T
    Ueda, Takahiro
    Yamamoto, Kaori
    Yazawa, Natsuka
    Tozawa, Ikki
    Ikedo, Masato
    Yui, Masao
    Nagata, Hiroyuki
    Nomura, Masahiko
    Ozawa, Yoshiyuki
    Ohno, Yoshiharu
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL, 2024, 8 (01)
  • [46] Advanced deep learning-based image reconstruction in lumbar spine MRI at 0.55 T - Effects on image quality and acquisition time in comparison to conventional deep learning-based reconstruction
    Schlicht, Felix
    Vosshenrich, Jan
    Donners, Ricardo
    Seifert, Alina Carolin
    Fenchel, Matthias
    Nickel, Dominik
    Obmann, Markus
    Harder, Dorothee
    Breit, Hanns-Christian
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY OPEN, 2024, 12
  • [47] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Abdomen at 3.0 Tesla: Image Quality and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Reproducibility Compared With 1.5 Tesla
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Oei, Marcel
    Babb, James S.
    Niver, Benjamin E.
    Taouli, Bachir
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 33 (01) : 128 - 135
  • [48] Diffusion-weighted Imaging Using 3.0 T MRI as a Possible Biomarker of Renal Tumors
    Mirka, Hynek
    Korcakova, Eva
    Kastner, Jan
    Hora, Milan
    Hes, Ondrej
    Hosek, Petr
    Ferda, Jiri
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 35 (04) : 2351 - 2357
  • [49] Minimizing prostate diffusion weighted MRI examination time through deep learning reconstruction
    Cochran, Rory L.
    Milshteyn, Eugene
    Ghosh, Soumyadeep
    Nakrour, Nabih
    Mercaldo, Nathaniel D.
    Guidon, Arnaud
    Harisinghani, Mukesh G.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2025, 117
  • [50] Deep learning-based image reconstruction algorithm for lung diffusion weighted imaging: improved image quality and diagnostic performance
    Li, Jie
    Xia, Yi
    Sun, Guangyuan
    Xu, Meiling
    Lin, Xiaoqing
    Jiang, Song
    Dai, Jiankun
    Liu, Shiyuan
    Fan, Li
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 7 (04) : 348 - 357