Energy sources evaluation based on multi-criteria decision support approach in China

被引:0
|
作者
Lin S.-S. [1 ]
Shen S.-L. [2 ]
Zhou A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean, and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai
[2] MOE Key Laboratory of Intelligent Manufacturing Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Shantou University, Guangdong, Shantou
[3] Discipline of Civil and Infrastructure, School of Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT), 3001, VIC
来源
Sustainable Horizons | 2022年 / 2卷
关键词
Bibliometric analysis; China; CRITIC method; Energy sources evaluation; Extended TOPSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.horiz.2022.100017
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study aims to develop a comprehensive evaluation approach to analyze and grade the energy sources based on statistical data. A brief bibliometric analysis for energy sources evaluation shows that clean, sustainable and environment friendly of energy development is the main trend. Four kinds of energy sources including raw coal, crude oil, natural gas and electricity, are analyzed. The approach is developed based on the extended technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and criteria importance through inter-criteria correlation (CRITIC). The CRITIC method is utilized to assign the weights of attributes and the extended TOPSIS is applied to grade the energy sources. An example about energy sources evaluation in China is adopted. Results show that non-renewable energy sources (raw coal and crude oil), are main energy sources from 2010 to 2018. Additionally, the correlation analysis and sensitivity studies are presented to illustrate the feasibility of the developed approach. Developed approach provides a tool in energy sources analysis. © 2022
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comprehensive Power Transformers Evaluation based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
    Vasovic, Stojan
    Dragasevic, Aleksandar
    Puzovic, Slavisa
    Puzovic, Sanja
    Paunovic, Vladan
    TEHNICKI VJESNIK-TECHNICAL GAZETTE, 2021, 28 (05): : 1448 - 1455
  • [22] Evaluation of energy economic optimization models using multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Alamoodi, A. H.
    Al-Samarraay, Mohammed S.
    Albahri, O. S.
    Deveci, Muhammet
    Albahri, A. S.
    Yussof, Salman
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 255
  • [23] Sustainable Energy Development. A Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach
    Mikalauskiene, Asta
    TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS, 2024, 23 (01): : 569 - 574
  • [24] A multi-criteria decision approach to sorting actions for promoting energy efficiency
    Neves, Luis Pires
    Martins, Antonio Goines
    Antunes, Carlos Henggeler
    Dias, Luis Candido
    ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (07) : 2351 - 2363
  • [26] Multi-criteria decision support based on iterative comparisons with reference points
    Renatus, Fabian
    Geldermann, Jutta
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 110 : 99 - 108
  • [27] Evaluation of Renewable Energy Projects Using Multi-Criteria Approach
    Malik, Arif
    Al Badi, Mohammed
    Al Kahali, Abdullah
    Al Nabhani, Younis
    Al Bahri, Alwarith
    Al Barhi, Hamed
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH IEEE GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (GHTC 2014), 2014, : 350 - 355
  • [28] Development of a Multi-Criteria Decision Support Tool for Energy Wood Supply Management
    Kuehmaier, Martin
    Stampfer, Karl
    CROATIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST ENGINEERING, 2012, 33 (02) : 181 - 198
  • [29] Emergency management evaluation by a fuzzy multi-criteria group decision support system
    Zhang, Guangquan
    Ma, Jun
    Lu, Jie
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2009, 23 (04) : 517 - 527
  • [30] A Collaborative Multi-Criteria Spatial Decision Support System for Multifunctional Landscape Evaluation
    Attardi, Raffaele
    Cerreta, Maria
    Poli, Giuliano
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2015, PT III, 2015, 9157 : 782 - 797