Energy sources evaluation based on multi-criteria decision support approach in China

被引:0
|
作者
Lin S.-S. [1 ]
Shen S.-L. [2 ]
Zhou A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean, and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai
[2] MOE Key Laboratory of Intelligent Manufacturing Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Shantou University, Guangdong, Shantou
[3] Discipline of Civil and Infrastructure, School of Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT), 3001, VIC
来源
Sustainable Horizons | 2022年 / 2卷
关键词
Bibliometric analysis; China; CRITIC method; Energy sources evaluation; Extended TOPSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.horiz.2022.100017
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study aims to develop a comprehensive evaluation approach to analyze and grade the energy sources based on statistical data. A brief bibliometric analysis for energy sources evaluation shows that clean, sustainable and environment friendly of energy development is the main trend. Four kinds of energy sources including raw coal, crude oil, natural gas and electricity, are analyzed. The approach is developed based on the extended technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and criteria importance through inter-criteria correlation (CRITIC). The CRITIC method is utilized to assign the weights of attributes and the extended TOPSIS is applied to grade the energy sources. An example about energy sources evaluation in China is adopted. Results show that non-renewable energy sources (raw coal and crude oil), are main energy sources from 2010 to 2018. Additionally, the correlation analysis and sensitivity studies are presented to illustrate the feasibility of the developed approach. Developed approach provides a tool in energy sources analysis. © 2022
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An integrated grey based multi-criteria decision making approach for the evaluation of renewable energy sources
    Celikbilek, Yakup
    Tuysuz, Fatih
    ENERGY, 2016, 115 : 1246 - 1258
  • [2] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Alternative Energy Sources in China
    Xue, Xiangwen
    Zhang, Qi
    Cai, Xinyu
    Ponkratov, Vadim V.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [3] Evaluation of decision trees: a multi-criteria approach
    Osei-Bryson, KM
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (11) : 1933 - 1945
  • [4] Multi-criteria decision support for China agricultural domestic support based on CGE model
    Zhang, Lingxian
    Li, Daoliang
    Liu, Xue
    Fu, Zetian
    MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2010, 51 (11-12) : 1326 - 1331
  • [5] Multi-criteria decision support system for RFS evaluation
    Mukhamediev, R.
    Mustakayev, R.
    Yakunin, K.
    Kiseleva, S.
    Gopejenko, V
    2018 IEEE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLICATION OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (AICT), 2018, : 13 - 18
  • [6] Knowledge-based multi-criteria decision support
    Zopounidis, Constantin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 195 (03) : 827 - 828
  • [7] Multi-criteria models with trend evaluation in decision making support
    Bodnarova, Agata
    Gavalec, Martin
    Mls, Karel
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 29TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN ECONOMICS 2011, PTS I AND II, 2011, : 47 - 52
  • [8] Green energy sources (GES) selection based on multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)
    Datta, Asim
    Ray, Amitava
    Bhattacharya, Gautam
    Saha, Hiranmay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2011, 5 (02) : 271 - 286
  • [9] A New Belief Function Based Approach for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Support
    Dezert, Jean
    Han, Deqiang
    Yin, Hanlin
    2016 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION FUSION (FUSION), 2016, : 782 - 789
  • [10] Evaluation of recommender systems: A multi-criteria decision making approach
    Sohrabi, Babak
    Toloo, Mehdi
    Moeini, Ali
    Nalchigar, Soroosh
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2015, 8 (04) : 589 - 605