Crowdsourcing platforms such as MTurk and Prolific have emerged as data sources for researchers in the social sciences. This article delves into the past, present, and future use of crowdsourced data in public administration scholarship. Through a review of published articles in top public administration journals (years 2013-2022), we uncover a general growth in the use of crowdsourced data over time. Additionally, we document how researchers have leveraged crowdsourced data to study a diverse range of themes and topics, with particular emphasis on survey experimental approaches and the examination of citizen attitudes and responses. Moreover, drawing on insights from a survey among quantitative public administration researchers, we discuss why the use of crowdsourced data is unlikely to diminish in the foreseeable future-despite ongoing debates regarding data quality and validity. We provide a set of guiding questions for researchers to consider when using crowdsourced data in public administration studies.
机构:
Grand Valley State Univ, Sch Publ & Nonprofit Adm Grand Rapids, Grand Rapids, MI 49504 USAGrand Valley State Univ, Sch Publ & Nonprofit Adm Grand Rapids, Grand Rapids, MI 49504 USA
机构:
Humane Soc United States, 700 Professional Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20879 USAHumane Soc United States, 700 Professional Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20879 USA
Clerc, Pascaline
Lipnick, Scott
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Med, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114 USAHumane Soc United States, 700 Professional Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20879 USA
Lipnick, Scott
Willett, Catherine
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Humane Soc United States, 700 Professional Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20879 USAHumane Soc United States, 700 Professional Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20879 USA