Evaluating Radar Reflector Localisation in Targeted Axillary Dissection in Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Wazir, Umar [1 ]
Michell, Michael J. [1 ]
Alamoodi, Munaser [1 ]
Mokbel, Kefah [1 ]
机构
[1] Princess Grace Hosp, London Breast Inst, London W1U 5NY, England
关键词
neoadjuvant systemic treatment; breast cancer; targeted axillary dissection; radar reflector localisation; Savi Scout; pCR; CHEMOTHERAPY; LESIONS; BIOPSY; MULTICENTER; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3390/cancers16071345
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Neoadjuvant therapy, which reduces advanced breast tumours before surgery, is common in medical practice. However, accurately mapping lymph nodes post-therapy is challenging and affects staging accuracy. One solution is marking the affected lymph nodes in the armpit before therapy, then removing the marked nodes during surgery via targeted axillary dissection (TAD), which combines standard sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with pre-neoadjuvant marked lymph node biopsy (MLNB). Radar reflector localisation (RRL) is a promising technology for locating tumours. Our study found that using RRL in TAD is reliable and accurate. This reduces the need for extensive armpit surgery in responsive patients, minimising surgical complications and improving their quality of life without compromising cancer outcomes.Abstract SAVI SCOUT (R) or radar reflector localisation (RRL) has proven accurate in localising non-palpable breast and axillary lesions, with minimal interference with MRI. Targeted axillary dissection (TAD), combining marked lymph node biopsy (MLNB) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), is becoming a standard post-neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) for node-positive early breast cancer. Compared to SLNB alone, TAD reduces the false negative rate (FNR) to below 6%, enabling safer axillary surgery de-escalation. This systematic review evaluates RRL's performance during TAD, assessing localisation and retrieval rates, the concordance between MLNB and SLNB, and the pathological complete response (pCR) in clinically node-positive patients post-NST. Four studies (252 TAD procedures) met the inclusion criteria, with a 99.6% (95% confidence [CI]: 98.9-100) successful localisation rate, 100% retrieval rate, and 81% (95% CI: 76-86) concordance rate between SLNB and MLNB. The average duration from RRL deployment to surgery was 52 days (range:1-202). pCR was observed in 42% (95% CI: 36-48) of cases, with no significant migration or complications reported. Omitting MLNB or SLNB would have under-staged the axilla in 9.7% or 3.4% (p = 0.03) of cases, respectively, underscoring the importance of incorporating MLNB in axillary staging post-NST in initially node-positive patients in line with the updated National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. These findings underscore the excellent efficacy of RRL in TAD for NST-treated patients with positive nodes, aiding in accurate axillary pCR identification and the safe omission of axillary dissection in strong responders.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Omission of Axillary Dissection in Node Positive Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy
    Peery, Gray B.
    Pak, Joyce
    Burkbauer, Laura
    Agala, Chris B.
    Selfridge, Julia M.
    Gallagher, Kristalyn K.
    Spanheimer, Philip M.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 292 : 247 - 257
  • [22] Targeted Axillary Dissection for Patients Who Convert to Clinically Node Negative After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Breast Cancer
    Kandice Ludwig
    Amanda L. Kong
    Current Breast Cancer Reports, 2020, 12 : 391 - 397
  • [23] Targeted Axillary Dissection for Patients Who Convert to Clinically Node Negative After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Breast Cancer
    Ludwig, Kandice
    Kong, Amanda L.
    CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS, 2020, 12 (04) : 391 - 397
  • [24] Targeted Axillary Dissection in Node-Positive Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study and Cost Analysis
    Beniey, Michele
    Boulva, Kerianne
    Rodriguez-Qizilbash, Samuel
    Kaviani, Ahmad
    Younan, Rami
    Patocskai, Erica
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (04)
  • [25] Evaluation of axillary response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy with sentinel node biopsy and axillary wire in node-positive breast cancer
    Navarro Sierra, Javier
    Rubio Cuesta, Patricia
    Villalobos Salguero, Francisco Javier
    Espiau Romera, Andrea
    Garcia Mur, Maria del Carmen
    Vicente Gomez, Isabel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 42 (06) : 1291 - 1299
  • [26] Wire guided localisation for targeted axillary node dissection is accurate in axillary staging in node positive breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Balasubramanian, Rajesh
    Morgan, Catrin
    Shaari, Elina
    Kovacs, Tibor
    Pinder, Sarah E.
    Hamed, Hisham
    Sever, Ali R.
    Kothari, Ashutosh
    EJSO, 2020, 46 (06): : 1028 - 1033
  • [27] Predictors of axillary node response in clinically node-positive patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer
    Ladak, Farah
    Lesniak, David
    Chua, Natalie
    Peiris, Lashan
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 : 264 - 265
  • [28] Early experience of robotic axillary lymph node dissection in patients with node-positive breast cancer
    Ahn, Jee Hyun
    Park, Jung Min
    Choi, Soon Bo
    Go, Jieon
    Lee, Jeea
    Kim, Jee Ye
    Park, Hyung Seok
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2023, 198 (03) : 405 - 412
  • [29] Early experience of robotic axillary lymph node dissection in patients with node-positive breast cancer
    Jee Hyun Ahn
    Jung Min Park
    Soon Bo Choi
    Jieon Go
    Jeea Lee
    Jee Ye Kim
    Hyung Seok Park
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2023, 198 : 405 - 412
  • [30] Decreasing Use of Axillary Dissection in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Toan T. Nguyen
    Tanya L. Hoskin
    Courtney N. Day
    Amy C. Degnim
    James W. Jakub
    Tina J. Hieken
    Judy C. Boughey
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 25 : 2596 - 2602