Knowledge payment research: status quo and key issues

被引:23
|
作者
Qi T. [1 ]
Wang T. [1 ]
Ma Y. [1 ]
Zhou X. [1 ]
机构
[1] Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing
来源
关键词
Knowledge demander; Knowledge payment; Knowledge payment platform; Knowledge provider; Knowledge supplier; Paid Q&A;
D O I
10.1108/IJCS-01-2019-0007
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Knowledge sharing has entered the stage of knowledge payment with the typical models of paid Q&A, live session, paid subscription, course column and community service. Numerous knowledge suppliers have begun to pour into the knowledge payment market, and users' willingness to pay for premium content has increased. However, the academic research on knowledge payment has just begun. Design/methodology/approach: In this paper, the authors searched several bibliographic databases using keywords such as “knowledge payment”, “paid Q&A”, “pay for answer”, “social Q&A”, “paywall” and “online health consultation” and selected papers from aspects of research scenes, research topics, etc. Finally, a total of 116 articles were identified for combing studies. Findings: This study found that in the early research, scholars paid attention to the definition of knowledge payment concept and the discrimination of typical models. With the continuous enrichment of research literature, the research direction has gradually been refined into three main branches from the perspective of research objects, i.e. knowledge provider, knowledge demander and knowledge payment platform. Originality/value: This paper focuses on discussing and sorting out the key research issues from these three research genres. Finally, the authors found out conflicting and contradictory research results and research gaps in the existing research and then put forward the urgent research topics. © 2019, Tuotuo Qi and Tianmei Wang.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 137
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] KEY ISSUES IN KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER FROM SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH TO BUSINESS PRACTICE
    Ravald, Annika
    Wikstrom, Solveig
    [J]. ICERI2014: 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2014, : 1794 - 1801
  • [12] Breaking Status-Quo Inertial Use of Incumbent Payment to Adopt Mobile Payment: A Contingency Perspective
    Lee, Eunmi Tatum
    Li, Xiaoyuan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2024, 40 (16) : 4275 - 4287
  • [13] Privacy preserving data mining research:Current status and key issues
    Wu, Xiaodan
    Chu, Chao-Hsien
    Wang, Yunfeng
    Liu, Fengli
    Yue, Diamnin
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE - ICCS 2007, PT 3, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4489 : 762 - +
  • [14] Medical ethics in China: Status quo and main issues
    Qiu, RZ
    [J]. CHINESE SCIENTISTS AND RESPONSIBILITY: ETHICAL ISSUES OF HUMAN GENETICS IN CHINESE AND INTERNATIONAL CONTEXTS, 1999, (314): : 24 - 32
  • [15] Microinsurance research: status quo and future research directions
    Eling, Martin
    Yao, Yi
    [J]. GENEVA PAPERS ON RISK AND INSURANCE-ISSUES AND PRACTICE, 2024, 49 (03): : 417 - 420
  • [16] Open innovation: status quo and quo vadis - an analysis of a research field
    Alberto Bertello
    Paola De Bernardi
    Francesca Ricciardi
    [J]. Review of Managerial Science, 2024, 18 : 633 - 683
  • [17] Empirical Research on the Status Quo of Knowledge Management and Countermeasures in High-star Hotels in China
    Zhou, Yaqing
    Wang, Chenchen
    [J]. 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICE SCIENCES (ICSS 2013), 2013, : 79 - 83
  • [18] Knowledge research issues
    Holtshouse, D
    [J]. CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 40 (03) : 277 - +
  • [19] Status Quo and Prospect of Felt Obligation Research
    Liu, Xiaolu
    Zhou, Yong
    [J]. 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, E-LEARNING AND MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY (EEMT 2017), 2017, : 474 - 478
  • [20] Research Portals: Status Quo and Improvement Perspectives
    Becker, Joerg
    Knackstedt, Ralf
    Lis, Lukasz
    Stein, Armin
    Steinhorst, Matthias
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 8 (03) : 27 - 46