Evaluation of the in vitro activity of ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam against A. Baumannii by the broth disk elution test

被引:0
|
作者
Jiang, Lan [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Dandan [1 ]
Song, Peipei [3 ]
Tang, Chengkang [1 ]
Liu, Xiaofen [1 ]
Hu, Fupin [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, Inst Antibiot, 12 Middle Wulumuqi Rd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Urumqi Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Dept Lab, Urumqi, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Chengdu Women's & Children's Cent Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Lab, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
Acinetobacter baumannii; Cefoperazone-sulbactam; Ampicillin-sulbactam; Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Broth disk elution; ACINETOBACTER-BAUMANNII; BETA-LACTAMASE; RESISTANCE; COLISTIN; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1007/s10096-024-04889-6
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
To evaluate the in vitro activity of ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam against A. baumannii using the broth disk elution testing, a total of 150 A. baumannii isolates were collected from across China between January 2019 and January 2021, including 51 carbapenem-susceptible and 99 carbapenem-resistant isolates. Broth disk elution (BDE) and the broth microdilution (BMD) method were performed for all strains. The concentration range of the BDE was 10/10 mu g/mL, 20/20 mu g/mL, and 30/30 mu g/mL for ampicillin-sulbactam, and 37.5/15 mu g/mL, 75/30 mu g/mL, 112.5/45 mu g/mL, and 150/60 mu g/mL for cefoperazone-sulbactam, respectively. Compared with BMD, the BDE results of ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam showed a categorical agreement of 83.3% (125/150) and 95.3% (143/150), with minor errors of 16.7% (25/150) and 4.7% (7/150), respectively. No major error or very major errors were detected. The sensitivity differences by BDE of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAb) to different concentrations of ampicillin-sulbactam showed statistically significant (p < 0.017), while those to cefoperazone-sulbactam at 37.5/15 <mu>g/mL, 75/30 mu g/mL, and 112.5/45 mu g/mL were significant (p < 0.008). However, no significant difference in sensitivity was observed between 112.5/45 <mu>g/mL and 150/60 mu g/mL (p > 0.008). In conclusion, the BDE is a reliable and convenient method to detect the in vitro activity of cefoperazone-sulbactam against A. baumannii, and the results could serve as a clinical reference value when deciding whether or not to use high-dose sulbactam for the treatment of A. baumannii infections.
引用
收藏
页码:1711 / 1719
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of sulbactam against Acinetobacter baumannii in in vitro and murine thigh and lung infection models
    Yokoyama, Yuta
    Matsumoto, Kazuaki
    Ikawa, Kazuro
    Watanabe, Erika
    Shigemi, Akari
    Umezaki, Yasuhiro
    Nakamura, Koyo
    Ueno, Keiichiro
    Morikawa, Norifumi
    Takeda, Yasuo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2014, 43 (06) : 547 - 552
  • [42] Predictors of effect of ampicillin-sulbactam against TEM-1 beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in an in vitro dynamic model: Enzyme activity versus MIC
    Firsov, AA
    Savarino, D
    Ruble, M
    Gilbert, D
    Manzano, B
    Medeiros, AA
    Zinner, SH
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1996, 40 (03) : 734 - 738
  • [43] IN-VITRO ACTIVITY OF AMPICILLIN/SULBACTAM AGAINST MULTIRESISTANT ACINETOBACTER-CALCOACETICUS VAR ANITRATUS CLINICAL ISOLATES
    DOUBOYAS, J
    TZOUVELEKIS, LS
    TSAKRIS, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1994, 34 (02) : 298 - 300
  • [44] In vitro synergistic effect of colistin and ampicillin/sulbactam with several antibiotics against clinical strains of multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
    Fatemeh, Shafiee
    Seyed, Saeed Naji Esfahani
    Atousa, Hakamifard
    Soltani, Rasool
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 39 (03) : 358 - 362
  • [45] Activity of ertapenem, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ampicillin-sulbactam against 12 common clinical isolates of community-acquired bacteremia
    Hwang, Kao-Pin
    Tang, Ya-Fen
    Shen, Yea-Huei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY IMMUNOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2009, 42 (05) : 433 - 438
  • [46] In vitro activity of eravacycline and cefoperazone/sulbactam against extensively-drug resistant and pan-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from a tertiary hospital in Greece
    Meletis, Georgios
    Protonotariou, Efthymia
    Gkeka, Ioanna
    Kassomenaki, Angeliki
    Mantzana, Paraskevi
    Tychala, Areti
    Vlachodimou, Nikoletta
    Kourti, Anastasia
    Skoura, Lemonia
    [J]. NEW MICROBIOLOGICA, 2022, 45 (03): : 210 - 212
  • [47] Two-Site Evaluation of the Colistin Broth Disk Elution Test To Determine Colistin In Vitro Activity against Gram-Negative Bacilli
    Simner, Patricia J.
    Bergman, Yehudit
    Trejo, Marisol
    Roberts, Ava A.
    Marayan, Remy
    Tekle, Tsigereda
    Campeau, Shelley
    Kazmi, Abida Q.
    Bell, Drew T.
    Lewis, Shawna
    Tamma, Pranita D.
    Humphries, Romney
    Hindler, Janet A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 57 (02)
  • [48] Comparative in-vitro activity of cefoperazone/sulbactam and 11 other agents against multidrug resistant Bacteroides fragilis group species
    Goldstein, EJC
    Citron, DM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1996, 38 (04) : 733 - 737
  • [49] In vitro pharmacodynamics of human-simulated exposures of ampicillin/sulbactam, doripenem and tigecycline alone and in combination against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
    Housman, Seth T.
    Hagihara, Mao
    Nicolau, David P.
    Kuti, Joseph L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2013, 68 (10) : 2296 - 2304
  • [50] In vitro synergy of the combination of sulbactam-durlobactam and cefepime at clinically relevant concentrations against A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales
    Fouad, Aliaa
    Nicolau, David P.
    Gill, Christian M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2023, 78 (12) : 2801 - 2809