Evaluation of the in vitro activity of ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam against A. Baumannii by the broth disk elution test

被引:0
|
作者
Jiang, Lan [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Dandan [1 ]
Song, Peipei [3 ]
Tang, Chengkang [1 ]
Liu, Xiaofen [1 ]
Hu, Fupin [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, Inst Antibiot, 12 Middle Wulumuqi Rd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Urumqi Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Dept Lab, Urumqi, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Chengdu Women's & Children's Cent Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Lab, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
Acinetobacter baumannii; Cefoperazone-sulbactam; Ampicillin-sulbactam; Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Broth disk elution; ACINETOBACTER-BAUMANNII; BETA-LACTAMASE; RESISTANCE; COLISTIN; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1007/s10096-024-04889-6
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
To evaluate the in vitro activity of ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam against A. baumannii using the broth disk elution testing, a total of 150 A. baumannii isolates were collected from across China between January 2019 and January 2021, including 51 carbapenem-susceptible and 99 carbapenem-resistant isolates. Broth disk elution (BDE) and the broth microdilution (BMD) method were performed for all strains. The concentration range of the BDE was 10/10 mu g/mL, 20/20 mu g/mL, and 30/30 mu g/mL for ampicillin-sulbactam, and 37.5/15 mu g/mL, 75/30 mu g/mL, 112.5/45 mu g/mL, and 150/60 mu g/mL for cefoperazone-sulbactam, respectively. Compared with BMD, the BDE results of ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam showed a categorical agreement of 83.3% (125/150) and 95.3% (143/150), with minor errors of 16.7% (25/150) and 4.7% (7/150), respectively. No major error or very major errors were detected. The sensitivity differences by BDE of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAb) to different concentrations of ampicillin-sulbactam showed statistically significant (p < 0.017), while those to cefoperazone-sulbactam at 37.5/15 <mu>g/mL, 75/30 mu g/mL, and 112.5/45 mu g/mL were significant (p < 0.008). However, no significant difference in sensitivity was observed between 112.5/45 <mu>g/mL and 150/60 mu g/mL (p > 0.008). In conclusion, the BDE is a reliable and convenient method to detect the in vitro activity of cefoperazone-sulbactam against A. baumannii, and the results could serve as a clinical reference value when deciding whether or not to use high-dose sulbactam for the treatment of A. baumannii infections.
引用
收藏
页码:1711 / 1719
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INVITRO ACTIVITIES OF AMPICILLIN-SULBACTAM AND CEFOPERAZONE-SULBACTAM AGAINST OXACILLIN-SUSCEPTIBLE AND OXACILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCI
    BARRY, AL
    JONES, RN
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1990, 34 (09) : 1830 - 1832
  • [2] TIME-KILL STUDIES - STAPHYLOCCOCUS-AUREUS VERSUS AMPICILLIN-SULBACTAM AND CEFOPERAZONE-SULBACTAM
    BAKER, M
    GREENBERG, RN
    [J]. CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1990, 38 (04): : A990 - A990
  • [3] In vitro activity of ampicillin-sulbactam against clinical multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates
    Gales, AC
    Sader, HS
    Sinto, S
    Santos, OP
    Mendes, CMF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 1996, 8 (06) : 416 - 419
  • [4] In vitro activity of cefoperazone and cefoperazone-sulbactam against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Lai, Chih-Cheng
    Chen, Chi-Chung
    Lu, Ying-Chen
    Chuang, Yin-Ching
    Tang, Hung-Jen
    [J]. INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE, 2019, 12 : 25 - 29
  • [5] In vitro activity of tigecycline in combination with cefoperazone-sulbactam against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
    Liu, Bin
    Bai, Yan
    Liu, Youning
    Di, Xiuzhen
    Zhang, Xin
    Wang, Rui
    Wang, Jin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 2015, 27 (05) : 271 - 276
  • [6] In Vitro Activity of Minocycline Alone and in Combination with Cefoperazone-Sulbactam Against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
    Pei, Guangsheng
    Mao, Yimin
    Sun, Yuxia
    [J]. MICROBIAL DRUG RESISTANCE, 2012, 18 (06) : 574 - 577
  • [7] In vitro activities of ampicillin-sulbactam and amoxicillin clavulanic acid against Acinetobacter baumannii
    Pandey, A
    Kapil, A
    Sood, S
    Goel, V
    Das, B
    Seth, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 36 (11) : 3415 - 3416
  • [8] INVITRO ACTIVITY OF CEFOPERAZONE-SULBACTAM AGAINST BACTEROIDES SPECIES
    DIAS, MBS
    JACOBUS, NV
    TALLY, FP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1986, 18 (04) : 467 - 471
  • [9] CEFOPERAZONE AND CEFOPERAZONE-SULBACTAM SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTS WITH ANAEROBIC-BACTERIA BY THE THIOGLYCOLATE DISK ELUTION METHOD
    BARRY, AL
    PACKER, RR
    JONES, RN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1985, 22 (05) : 882 - 883
  • [10] Activity of trovafloxacin (with or without ampicillin-sulbactam) against enterococci in an in vitro dynamic model of infection
    Zinner, SH
    Gilbert, D
    Dudley, MN
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1998, 42 (01) : 72 - 77