Risk analysis of critical infrastructure with the MOSAR method

被引:1
|
作者
Fosner, Ajda [1 ]
Bertoncelj, Brane [1 ]
Poznic, Tomaz [1 ]
Fink, Laura [1 ]
机构
[1] GEA Coll, Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
Risk analysis; MOSAR method; Critical infrastructure; Distribution transformer stations; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26439
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The smooth running of the electric energy system is crucial, especially given the current geopolitical environment. To achieve this goal, it is essential to establish a solid infrastructure that is both accessible and safe. We protect consumer reputation and trust, reduce financial losses, and lessen unfavourable effects on employees and business owners by maintaining continuous functioning. This study has discovered several important concerns using the Method Organised Systematic Analysis of Risk (MOSAR). These include the possibility of cyberattacks, the availability of information and technology systems, the loss of critical individuals, and network problems. To address these risks, it is necessary to deliver electrical energy on time and at a high standard, to be responsive to client requests, and to follow best practices, technical standards, and personal and environmental protection measures. The findings of this study make valuable contributions to risk assessment efforts, allowing us to identify potential threats to the security and reliability of national power systems. Overall, it is essential to maintain a robust and resilient energy infrastructure to ensure uninterrupted operation and mitigate risks effectively.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MISSION-BASED ANALYSIS FOR ASSESSING CYBER RISK IN CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS
    Llanso, Thomas
    Tally, Gregg
    Silberglitt, Michael
    Anderson, Tara
    CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION VII, 2013, 417 : 201 - 214
  • [22] A Review of Cybersecurity Risk and Consequences for Critical Infrastructure
    Touhiduzzaman, Md
    Gourisetti, Sri Nikhil Gupta
    Eppinger, Crystal
    Somani, Abhishek
    2019 RESILIENCE WEEK (RWS), 2019, : 7 - 13
  • [23] Autonomic risk management for critical infrastructure protection
    Ulieru, N
    Worthington, P
    INTEGRATED COMPUTER-AIDED ENGINEERING, 2006, 13 (01) : 63 - 80
  • [24] Environmental security, critical infrastructure and risk assessment
    Belluck, D. A.
    Hull, R. N.
    Benjamin, S. L.
    Alcorn, J.
    Linkov, I.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY IN HARBORS AND COASTAL AREAS: MANAGEMENT USING COMPARATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2007, : 3 - +
  • [25] A conceptual modeling method for critical infrastructure modeling
    Sokolowski, John
    Turnitsa, Charles
    Diallo, Saikou
    41ST ANNUAL SIMULATION SYMPOSIUM, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 203 - 211
  • [26] Interactive visualizations for critical infrastructure analysis
    Tolone, William J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, 2009, 2 (03) : 124 - 134
  • [27] Vulnerability analysis of critical infrastructure network
    Kizhakkedath, A.
    Tai, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION, 2021, 35
  • [28] Analysis and Modelling of Critical Infrastructure Systems
    Pye, Graeme
    Warren, Matthew
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION WARFARE AND SECURITY, 2011, : 194 - 201
  • [29] Risk Matrix-Based Method for Critical Infrastructure Safety Assessment Taking into Account Interdependencies
    Brezhnev, Eugene
    Chernetskiy, Bogdan
    20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CIRCUITS, SYSTEMS, COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTERS (CSCC 2016), 2016, 76
  • [30] MASTODON: An Open-Source Software for Seismic Analysis and Risk Assessment of Critical Infrastructure
    Veeraraghavan, Swetha
    Bolisetti, Chandrakanth
    Slaughter, Andrew
    Coleman, Justin
    Dhulipala, Somayajulu
    Hoffman, William
    Kim, Kyungtae
    Kurt, Efe
    Spears, Robert
    Munday, Lynn
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 207 (07) : 1073 - 1095