Numerical Analysis of Erosion Resistance of Elbow with Bionic Inner Surface Structure

被引:0
|
作者
Guo Z.-H. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang J. [1 ,2 ]
Huang J.-M. [3 ]
Li H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] School of Marine Equipment and Mechanical Engineering, Jimei University, Fujian, Xiamen
[2] Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Energy Cleaning Utilization and Development, Fujian, Xiamen
[3] Xiamen Anmaixin Automation Technology Co., Ltd., Fujian, Xiamen
来源
Surface Technology | 2023年 / 52卷 / 05期
关键词
bionic surface; CFD-DPM; elbow; erosion; gas-solid two-phase flow; numerical simulation; triangle groove;
D O I
10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2023.05.009
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Pipeline erosion is an important problem that cannot be ignored in gas-solid two-phase flow. Erosion damages not only waste materials, consume energy and reduce equipment efficiency, but also accelerate equipment failure and reduce service life of equipment, resulting in greater economic losses. To solve this problem, from the perspective of bionics, the anti-erosion characteristics of transverse groove bionic surface with the triangle groove, rectangle groove and isosceles trapezoidal groove in gas-solid two-phase flow elbow were designed by referring to the body surface morphology of desert tamarisk and desert scorpion, and the erosion law of the elbow with bionic surface was discussed under different flow rates and mass flow rates. The best combination of erosion resistance was obtained by orthogonal test simulation design. CFD-DPM method, Finnie erosion model and Realizable k-ε model with vortex modification were adopted to carry out numerical simulation on the anti-erosion characteristics of the elbow with bionic surface structure by considering the bidirectional coupling between particle and fluid and study the effect of different flow rates and particle mass flow rates on the erosion. On the basis of numerical simulation, orthogonal test method was used to analyze the effect of three main parameters of the triangle groove bionic structure on anti-erosion characteristics. The numerical simulation results showed that the erosion of the elbow with bionic surface structure mainly occurred at the bottom of the groove in the 35°-60° area of the elbow, and the erosion was less in the concave area at the top. The three kinds of groove surface bionic structures could improve the wear resistance of the elbow. The maximum erosion rate of the ordinary elbow was 1.2×10-4 kg/(m2·s). The triangle groove had the best erosion resistance, and the maximum erosion rate was 38.33% higher than that of the ordinary elbow, followed by that of rectangle groove, which was 28% higher, and that isosceles trapezoidal groove, which was only 8.33% higher. The variation trend of the maximum erosion rate of the three biomimetic surface structures was the same as that of the ordinary elbow at different flow rates and particle mass flow rates, and the order of anti-erosion performance did not change with the change of flow rates and particle mass flow rates. Orthogonal test results showed that the affecting factors of erosion in the triangle groove were groove spacing, groove width and groove depth in turn. Under the simulation conditions, the best combination was the triangle groove with width of 4 mm, depth of 4 mm and spacing of 3mm, and the anti-erosion performance was improved by 41.5% compared with that of ordinary elbow. The bionic surface structure of the groove enhances the turbulence intensity of the fluid, leading to the flow field change around the groove structure, which is easy to be drawn by the fluid and reduces the collision between the particles and the wall. The height difference between the top and bottom of the groove absorbs the kinetic energy of particle collision and reduces the collision velocity, thus reducing erosion. The surface bionic structure with the best erosion resistance is the triangle groove, rectangle groove and isosceles trapezoidal groove. The affecting factors of erosion in the triangle groove are groove spacing, groove width and groove depth. This conclusion can provide a new idea for the design of anti-erosion characteristics of elbow. © 2023 Chongqing Wujiu Periodicals Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 100
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [11] ZHOU Jia-wei, DU Chang-long, MA Zi-ling, Influence of Swirling Intensity on Lump Coal Particle Pickup Velocity in Pneumatic Conveying, Powder Technology, 339, pp. 470-478, (2018)
  • [12] KARBALAEI AKBARI M, BAHARVANDI H R, SHIRVANIMOGHADDAM K., Tensile and Fracture Behavior of Nano/Micro TiB<sub>2</sub> Particle Reinforced Casting A356 Aluminum Alloy Composites, Materials & Design, 66, pp. 150-161, (2015)
  • [13] YANG Jing-zhou, FANG Ming-hao, HUANG Zhao-hui, Et al., Solid Particle Impact Erosion of Alumina-Based Refractories at Elevated Temperatures, Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 32, 2, pp. 283-289, (2012)
  • [14] YANG Q, MCKELLAR R., Nanolayered CrAlTiN and Multilayered CrAlTiN–AlTiN Coatings for Solid Particle Erosion Protection, Tribology International, 83, pp. 12-20, (2015)
  • [15] BORAWSKI B, TODD J A, SINGH J, Et al., The Influence of Ductile Interlayer Material on the Particle Erosion Resistance of Multilayered TiN Based Coatings, Wear, 271, 11, pp. 2890-2898, (2011)
  • [16] PAULITSCH J, MARINGER C, MAYRHOFER P H., Low Friction CrN<sub>MPP</sub>/TiN<sub>DCMS</sub> Multilayer Coatings, Tribology Letters, 46, 1, pp. 87-93, (2012)
  • [17] O'FLYNN D J, BINGLEY M S, BRADLEY M S A, Et al., A Model to Predict the Solid Particle Erosion Rate of Metals and Its Assessment Using Heat-Treated Steels, Wear, 248, 1, pp. 162-177, (2001)
  • [18] LI Rui, SUN Zhi-qian, LI An-jun, Et al., Design Optimization of Hemispherical Protrusion for Mitigating Elbow Erosion via CFD-DPM, Powder Technology, 398, (2022)
  • [19] DUARTE C A R, DE SOUZA F J, DOS SANTOS V F., Mitigating Elbow Erosion with a Vortex Chamber, Powder Technology, 288, pp. 6-25, (2016)
  • [20] QIN Xiao-jing, JIANG Jia-lian, ZHANG Jun-qiu, Study on Anti-Erosion Performance of Centrifugal Fan Impeller with Bionic Surface, Surface Technology, 50, 8, pp. 84-94, (2021)