Simulation study of multilayer coalbed methane production in steeply inclined reservoirs in the southern edge of Junggar Basin

被引：0
|
作者：
Huang H. [1 ,2 ]
Fu X. [3 ]
Zhao Z. [1 ,2 ]
Chen D. [1 ,2 ]
Peng H. [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] China United Coalbed Methane National Engineering Research Center Co., Ltd., Beijing
[2] PetroChina Coalbed Methane Company Limited, Beijing
[3] MOE Key Laboratory of Coalbed Methane Resources and Accumulation Process, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou
来源：
Meitan Kexue Jishu/Coal Science and Technology (Peking) | 2022年 / 50卷 / 07期
关键词：
interlayer interference; multilayer drainage; numerical simulation; reservoirs coalbed methane; steeply inclined;
D O I：
10.13199/j.cnki.cst.MCQ20-034
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In order to promote the efficient development of coalbed methane (CBM) with extremely thick, multi-layered and steeply inclined coal reservoirs in the southern margin of the Junggar Basin, based on the geological data of CS18 well in Fukang west area, the production characteristics of three-layer steeply inclined CBM reservoir under different interlayer spacing, different drainage intensity and different physical parameters were simulated and studied by using Eclipse software. The simulation results show that the shape of the total gas production curves of steeply inclined reservoirs with different layer spacings are basically the same, and they all show a trend of increasing first and then decreasing daily gas production. With the increase of interlayer spacing, the gas production of the first layer increases gradually due to the higher permeability, while the third layer is opposite. However, the increase in the production of the first layer of reservoir and the decrease of the production of the third layer of the reservoir mostly offset, and the gas content in the updip direction of the reservoir increases slightly faster than that in the downdip direction with the increase of interval. Therefore, in the process of three-layer commingled production, the closer the first layer and the third layer are to the main production layer (the first layer), the higher the gas production, the larger the layer spacing, the lower the gas production. There is also a difference between the updip direction and the downdip direction of multi-layer commingled reservoirs for steeply inclined reservoirs. With the increase of drainage intensity, the reservoir pressure in the updip direction decreases rapidly, which accelerates the process of three-layer commingled production. However, the drainage intensity is low, and the desorption and production of CBM are restrained due to the high reservoir pressure in the updip direction, but with the progress of drainage, the inhibition gradually disappears. The effect of gas content and permeability physical parameters on multi-layer commingled production is also different. The simulation results show that the high gas content in the middle reservoir can make use of the upper and lower CBM production, while the high permeability will inhibit the production of CBM in the upper and lower reservoirs. © 2022 China Coal Society. All Rights Reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：199 / 205
页数：6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [11] SUN Pengjie, YAO Wentao, SUN Ning, Et al., Drainage effects of multiple superimposed CBM systems under different drainage systems, Coal Geology of China, 26, 12, pp. 45-47, (2014)
  • [12] LI Xin, FU Xuehai, LI Gang, Discussion of progressive drainage and separated reservoirs drainage of multiple CBM well in West Guizhou, Coal Science and Technology, 44, 2, pp. 22-26, (2016)
  • [13] XU Jiang, ZHANG Chaolin, PENG Shoujian, Et al., Multiple layers superposed CBM system commingled drainage schedule and its optimization, Journal of China Coal Society, 43, 6, pp. 1677-1686, (2018)
  • [14] XIE Xueheng, FAN Mingzhu, WANG Qiankuo, Et al., Sensitivity numerical simulation of production intensity on the gas production rate of CBM wells, Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 3, 5, pp. 77-79, (2013)
  • [15] ZHANG Xiaoyang, WU Caifang, LIU Qiang, Study on drainage system of coalbed methane well based on drainage rate, Coal Science and Technology, 43, 6, pp. 131-135, (2015)
  • [16] SU Xuefeng, LIU Yan, CUI Zhouqi, Et al., Influence of depressurization rate on gas production capacity of high-rank coal in the south of Qinshui Basin, China, Petroleum Exploration and Development, 46, 3, pp. 613-620, (2019)
  • [17] RAO Mengyu, JIANG Shuhua, Analysis on drainage techniques of coalbed methane well, China Coalbed Methane, 7, 1, pp. 22-25, (2010)
  • [18] DU Xinfeng, GUO Shengqiang, ZHANG Qun, Et al., Separate - layer pressure control and multi - layer drainage technology and device for coalbed methane wells with multiple seams, Coal Science and Technology, 46, 6, pp. 114-118, (2018)
  • [19] XIE Xueheng, QIN Xuecheng, Method of predicting methane emerging time in coalbed methane shaft and its application, Coal Mining Technology, 18, 4, pp. 5-7, (2013)
12