Assessment of Machine Learning Algorithms for Land Cover Classification in a Complex Mountainous Landscape

被引:5
|
作者
Amin, Gomal [1 ,2 ]
Imtiaz, Iqra [1 ]
Haroon, Ehsan [1 ]
Saqib, Najum Us [3 ]
Shahzad, Muhammad Imran [1 ]
Nazeer, Majid [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] COMSATS Univ Islamabad, Dept Meteorol, Earth & Atmospher Remote Sensing Lab EARL, Islamabad 45550, Pakistan
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Land Surveying & Geoinformat, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Quaid I Azam Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Islamabad 15320, Pakistan
[4] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Res Inst Land & Space, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Supervised classification; Sentinel-2; data; Land cover classification; Gilgit-Baltistan; Google Earth Engine; NEURAL-NETWORK; RANDOM FORESTS; PAKISTAN; HIMALAYAS; SYSTEM; CART; GIS;
D O I
10.1007/s41651-024-00195-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mapping land cover (LC) in mountainous regions, such as the Gilgit-Baltistan (GB) area of Pakistan, presents significant challenges due to complex terrain, limited data availability, and accessibility constraints. This study addresses these challenges by developing a robust, data-driven approach to classify LC using high-resolution Sentinel-2 (S-2) satellite imagery from 2019 within Google Earth Engine (GEE). The research evaluated the performance of various machine learning (ML) algorithms, including classification and regression tree (CART), maximum entropy (gmoMaxEnt), minimum distance (minDistance), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF), without extensive hyperparameter tuning. Additionally, ten different scenarios based on various band combinations of S-2 data were used as input for running the ML models. The LC classification was performed using 2759 sample points, with 70% for training and 30% for validation. The results indicate that the RF algorithm outperformed all other classifiers under scenario S1 (using 10 bands), achieving an overall accuracy (OA) of 0.79 and a kappa coefficient of 0.76. The final RF-based LC mapping shows the following percentage distribution: barren land (46.7%), snow cover (22.9%), glacier (7.9%), grasses (7.2%), water (4.7%), wetland (2.9%), built-up (2.7%), agriculture (1.9%), and forest (1.2%). It is suggested that the best identified RF classifier within the GEE environment should be used for advanced multi-source data image classification with hyperparameter tuning to increase OA. Additionally, it is suggested to build the capacity of various stakeholders in GB for better monitoring of LC changes and resource management using geospatial big data.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessing land-use statistics to model land cover change in a mountainous landscape in the European Alps
    Rutherford, Gillian N.
    Bebi, Peter
    Edwards, Peter J.
    Zimmermann, Niklaus E.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2008, 212 (3-4) : 460 - 471
  • [42] Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment
    Foody, GM
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 80 (01) : 185 - 201
  • [43] Machine learning algorithms for mode-of-action classification in toxicity assessment
    Zhang, Yile
    Wong, Yau Shu
    Deng, Jian
    Anton, Cristina
    Gabos, Stephan
    Zhang, Weiping
    Huang, Dorothy Yu
    Jin, Can
    BIODATA MINING, 2016, 9
  • [44] Machine learning algorithms for mode-of-action classification in toxicity assessment
    Yile Zhang
    Yau Shu Wong
    Jian Deng
    Cristina Anton
    Stephan Gabos
    Weiping Zhang
    Dorothy Yu Huang
    Can Jin
    BioData Mining, 9
  • [45] Land cover classification using RADARSAT data in a mountainous area of Southern Argentina
    Peng, XL
    Wang, JF
    Raed, M
    Gari, J
    IGARSS 2002: IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM AND 24TH CANADIAN SYMPOSIUM ON REMOTE SENSING, VOLS I-VI, PROCEEDINGS: REMOTE SENSING: INTEGRATING OUR VIEW OF THE PLANET, 2002, : 3270 - 3272
  • [46] Comparing Four Machine Learning Algorithms for Land Cover Classification in Gold Mining: A Case Study of Kyaukpahto Gold Mine, Northern Myanmar
    Oo, Tin Ko
    Arunrat, Noppol
    Sereenonchai, Sukanya
    Ussawarujikulchai, Achara
    Chareonwong, Uthai
    Nutmagul, Winai
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (17)
  • [47] AGTML: A novel approach to land cover classification by integrating automatic generation of training samples and machine learning algorithms on Google Earth Engine
    Cui, Yanglin
    Yang, Gaoxiang
    Zhou, Yanbing
    Zhao, Chunjiang
    Pan, Yuchun
    Sun, Qian
    Gu, Xiaohe
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 154
  • [48] Remote Sensing Based Land Cover Classification Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey
    Mitra, Soma
    Basu, Saikat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEXT-GENERATION COMPUTING, 2023, 14 (02): : 381 - 399
  • [49] Land Cover Classification in Mountainous Area Based on Airborne CCD Image with LiDAR
    Huang K.
    Yu Q.
    Huang H.
    Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2020, 51 (03): : 201 - 208
  • [50] Reducing landscape heterogeneity for improved land use and land cover (LULC) classification across the large and complex Ethiopian highlands
    Kassawmar, Tibebu
    Eckert, Sandra
    Hurni, Kaspar
    Zeleke, Gete
    Hurni, Hans
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 33 (01) : 53 - 69