Implementing strategies to improve uptake of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in gender-affirming care: a mixed-methods implementation study

被引:5
|
作者
Kamran, Rakhshan [1 ]
Jackman, Liam [2 ]
Goodwin, Charlie [3 ]
Laws, Anna [3 ]
Stepney, Melissa [4 ]
Harrison, Conrad [1 ]
Jain, Abhilash [1 ]
Rodrigues, Jeremy [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Rheumatol & Musculoskeleta, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Cumbria Northumberland Tyne & Wear NHS Fdn Trust, Northern Reg Gender Dysphoria Serv, Benfield House, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE6 4QD, England
[4] Univ Oxford, Dept Psychiat, Oxford, England
[5] Stoke Mandeville Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Buckinghamshire NHS Trust, Aylesbury, England
[6] Univ Warwick, Warwick Clin Trials Unit, Coventry, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Outcome Assessment; Health Care; Implementation science; Health services research; Health Equity; TRANSGENDER; HEALTH; SCALE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002777
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Importance The Practical Guide to Implementing PROMs in Gender-Affirming Care (PG-PROM-GAC) is an evidence-based resource, which was developed in response to international calls for improved patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) implementation in gender-affirming care. The PG-PROM-GAC has the potential to improve PROM implementation; however, its real-world effectiveness has not yet been investigated.Objective Investigate effectiveness and fidelity of three implementation strategies from the PG-PROM-GAC in a real-world gender clinic setting.Design Interrupted time series mixed-methods study investigating response rates to a PROM deployed alongside implementation strategies from the PG-PROM-GAC; and open-ended feedback on the fidelity and effectiveness of implementation strategies.Setting Participants were recruited from a National Health Service (NHS) gender clinic.Participants Eligible participants were being seen at an NHS gender clinic for an appointment during the study period, and were invited to participate in this study via email.Intervention Three implementation strategies from the PG-PROM-GAC deployed alongside a PROM.Main outcome(s) and measure(s) Response rates were calculated at 2-week intervals, in line with the deployment of each implementation strategy. Open-ended responses were thematically analysed by two researchers following guidance from implementation science and interpretation from Normalisation Process Theory.Results A total of 28 participants were included in this study with a mean (SD) age of 39 (17) years. In general, participants rated education material for PROMs as the most important for PROM implementation, and accessibility options for PROMs as the second most important. Response rates to PROM completion dropped as the study progressed, as the burden of reviewing implementation strategies increased. Results were used to construct recommendations for future PROM implementation efforts.Conclusions and relevance The PG-PROM-GAC and implementation strategy materials developed from this study (ie, educational video on PROMs co-developed with key stakeholders) can be used by clinicians, researchers and policymakers to lead PROM implementation efforts in gender-affirming care.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine care palliative radiotherapy
    Schuler, Thilo
    Hruby, George
    Eade, Thomas
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 154 : E10 - E11
  • [22] Core Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and PRO Measures (PROMs) for Polypharmacy Medicines Reviews: A Sequential Mixed-Methods Study
    Kotronoulas, Grigorios
    Cooper, Mark
    Johnston, Bridget
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2019, 13 : 2071 - 2087
  • [23] Danish translation and linguistic validation of the GENDER-Q, a patient-reported outcome measure for use in gender-affirming care
    Igbokwe, Michelle Mistry
    Poulsen, Lotte
    Taulbjerg Kristensen, Tine
    Klassen, Anne F.
    Kaur, Manraj N.
    Breitkopf, Trisia
    Graesser, Jack
    Holmgaard, Rikke
    Sorensen, Jens Ahm
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2025, 48 (01)
  • [24] Gender perspective in the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in rare diseases
    Perez, Sara
    Funes, Silvina
    Leyra, Begona
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (SUPPL 1) : 5 - 5
  • [25] Statistical process control assessed implementation fidelity of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine care
    Roberts, Natasha A.
    Alexander, Kimberly
    Wyld, David
    Janda, Monika
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 127 : 76 - 86
  • [26] How the Routine Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Hemodialysis Care Influences Patient-Clinician Communication A Mixed-Methods Study
    Schick-Makaroff, Kara
    Wozniak, Lisa A.
    Short, Hilary
    Davison, Sara N.
    Klarenbach, Scott
    Buzinski, Robert
    Walsh, Michael
    Johnson, Jeffrey A.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 17 (11): : 1631 - 1645
  • [27] Patient-reported outcome measures for assessing urinary dysfunction following gender-affirming genital surgery: A narrative review of the literature
    Keiner, Cathrine
    Okamuro, Kyle
    Bate, Taylor
    Dy, Geolani
    Anger, Jennifer
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2024, 43 (08) : 2110 - 2122
  • [28] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to guide clinical care: recommendations and challenges
    Trujols, Joan
    Duran-Sindreu, Santiago
    Portella, Maria J.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2022, 217 (02) : 110 - 110
  • [29] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to guide clinical care: recommendations and challenges
    Agarwal, Anupriya
    Pain, Tilley
    Levesque, Jean-Frederic
    Girgis, Afaf
    Hoffman, Anna
    Karnon, Jonathan
    King, Madeleine T.
    Shah, Karan K.
    Morton, Rachael L.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2022, 216 (01) : 9 - 11
  • [30] Women's experiences with using patient-reported outcome and experience measures in routine perinatal care in the Netherlands: a mixed-methods study
    Laureij, Lyzette T.
    Depla, Anne L.
    Kariman, Shariva S.
    Lamain-de Ruiter, Marije
    Ernst -Smelt, Hiske E.
    Hazelzet, Jan Antonius
    Franx, Arie
    Bekker, Mireille N.
    BUZZ project team
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (03):