Artificial intelligence derived large language model in decision-making process in uveitis

被引:0
|
作者
Schumacher, Ines [1 ]
Buhler, Virginie Manuela Marie [1 ]
Jaggi, Damian [1 ]
Roth, Janice [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bern, Dept Ophthalmol, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Moorfields Eye Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, City Rd, London EC1V 2, England
关键词
D O I
10.1186/s40942-024-00581-1
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
BackgroundUveitis is the ophthalmic subfield dealing with a broad range of intraocular inflammatory diseases. With the raising importance of LLM such as ChatGPT and their potential use in the medical field, this research explores the strengths and weaknesses of its applicability in the subfield of uveitis.MethodsA series of highly clinically relevant questions were asked three consecutive times (attempts 1, 2 and 3) of the LLM regarding current uveitis cases. The answers were classified on whether they were accurate and sufficient, partially accurate and sufficient or inaccurate and insufficient. Statistical analysis included descriptive analysis, normality distribution, non-parametric test and reliability tests. References were checked for their correctness in different medical databases.ResultsThe data showed non-normal distribution. Data between subgroups (attempts 1, 2 and 3) was comparable (Kruskal-Wallis H test, p-value = 0.7338). There was a moderate agreement between attempt 1 and attempt 2 (Cohen's kappa, & kgreen; = 0.5172) as well as between attempt 2 and attempt 3 (Cohen's kappa, & kgreen; = 0.4913). There was a fair agreement between attempt 1 and attempt 3 (Cohen's kappa, & kgreen; = 0.3647). The average agreement was moderate (Cohen's kappa, & kgreen; = 0.4577). Between the three attempts together, there was a moderate agreement (Fleiss' kappa, & kgreen; = 0.4534). A total of 52 references were generated by the LLM. 22 references (42.3%) were found to be accurate and correctly cited. Another 22 references (42.3%) could not be located in any of the searched databases. The remaining 8 references (15.4%) were found to exist, but were either misinterpreted or incorrectly cited by the LLM.ConclusionOur results demonstrate the significant potential of LLMs in uveitis. However, their implementation requires rigorous training and comprehensive testing for specific medical tasks. We also found out that the references made by ChatGPT 4.o were in most cases incorrect. LLMs are likely to become invaluable tools in shaping the future of ophthalmology, enhancing clinical decision-making and patient care.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Applicability of Artificial Intelligence in Decision-Making for Land Forces
    Tudorache, Paul
    [J]. VOJENSKE ROZHLEDY-CZECH MILITARY REVIEW, 2021, 30 (02): : 39 - 54
  • [22] Organizational Decision-Making Structures in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
    Shrestha, Yash Raj
    Ben-Menahem, Shiko M.
    von Krogh, Georg
    [J]. CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2019, 61 (04) : 66 - 83
  • [23] Artificial Intelligence and Patient-Centered Decision-Making
    Bjerring J.C.
    Busch J.
    [J]. Philosophy & Technology, 2021, 34 (2) : 349 - 371
  • [24] Application of artificial intelligence in jurisdictional decision-making (Spain)
    Jimenez Cardona, Noemi
    [J]. QUAESTIO IURIS, 2023, 16 (03): : 1612 - 1630
  • [25] Decision-making in tunneling using artificial intelligence tools
    Mahmoodzadeh, Arsalan
    Mohammadi, Mokhtar
    Daraei, Ako
    Faraj, Rabar H.
    Omer, Rebaz Mohammed Dler
    Sherwani, Aryan Far H.
    [J]. TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 103
  • [26] Algorithms and Influence Artificial Intelligence and Crisis Decision-Making
    Horowitz, Michael C.
    Lin-Greenberg, Erik
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2022, 66 (04)
  • [27] Rescue Artificial Intelligence Assistant Decision-Making System
    Zhou, Huaren
    Liu, Changyu
    Zhang, Chun
    Zhang, Yan
    [J]. 2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (ICEIM 2011), 2011, : 47 - 49
  • [28] ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE IN CLINICAL LABORATORY DECISION-MAKING
    PAPPAS, AA
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1985, 31 (06) : 895 - 896
  • [29] Substation decision-making platform based on artificial intelligence
    Qin, Jianhua
    Zhu, Xueqiong
    Wang, Zhen
    Ma, Jingtan
    Gao, Shan
    Hu, Chengbo
    [J]. Hu, Chengbo (huchengbo01@163.com), 1600, River Publishers (35): : 151 - 172
  • [30] Augmenting Medical Diagnosis Decisions? An Investigation into Physicians' Decision-Making Process with Artificial Intelligence
    Jussupow, Ekaterina
    Spohrer, Kai
    Heinzl, Armin
    Gawlitza, Joshua
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2021, 32 (03) : 713 - 735