Artificial intelligence derived large language model in decision-making process in uveitis

被引:0
|
作者
Schumacher, Ines [1 ]
Buhler, Virginie Manuela Marie [1 ]
Jaggi, Damian [1 ]
Roth, Janice [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bern, Dept Ophthalmol, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Moorfields Eye Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, City Rd, London EC1V 2, England
关键词
D O I
10.1186/s40942-024-00581-1
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
BackgroundUveitis is the ophthalmic subfield dealing with a broad range of intraocular inflammatory diseases. With the raising importance of LLM such as ChatGPT and their potential use in the medical field, this research explores the strengths and weaknesses of its applicability in the subfield of uveitis.MethodsA series of highly clinically relevant questions were asked three consecutive times (attempts 1, 2 and 3) of the LLM regarding current uveitis cases. The answers were classified on whether they were accurate and sufficient, partially accurate and sufficient or inaccurate and insufficient. Statistical analysis included descriptive analysis, normality distribution, non-parametric test and reliability tests. References were checked for their correctness in different medical databases.ResultsThe data showed non-normal distribution. Data between subgroups (attempts 1, 2 and 3) was comparable (Kruskal-Wallis H test, p-value = 0.7338). There was a moderate agreement between attempt 1 and attempt 2 (Cohen's kappa, & kgreen; = 0.5172) as well as between attempt 2 and attempt 3 (Cohen's kappa, & kgreen; = 0.4913). There was a fair agreement between attempt 1 and attempt 3 (Cohen's kappa, & kgreen; = 0.3647). The average agreement was moderate (Cohen's kappa, & kgreen; = 0.4577). Between the three attempts together, there was a moderate agreement (Fleiss' kappa, & kgreen; = 0.4534). A total of 52 references were generated by the LLM. 22 references (42.3%) were found to be accurate and correctly cited. Another 22 references (42.3%) could not be located in any of the searched databases. The remaining 8 references (15.4%) were found to exist, but were either misinterpreted or incorrectly cited by the LLM.ConclusionOur results demonstrate the significant potential of LLMs in uveitis. However, their implementation requires rigorous training and comprehensive testing for specific medical tasks. We also found out that the references made by ChatGPT 4.o were in most cases incorrect. LLMs are likely to become invaluable tools in shaping the future of ophthalmology, enhancing clinical decision-making and patient care.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Recruitment Process Decision-Making
    Al-Alawi, Adel Ismail
    Naureen, Misbah
    AlAlawi, Ebtesam Ismaeel
    Al-Hadad, Ahmed Abdulla Naser
    [J]. 2021 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AID SCIENCES AND APPLICATION (DASA), 2021,
  • [2] Artificial Intelligence and Decision-Making
    Dear, Keith
    [J]. RUSI JOURNAL, 2019, 164 (5-6): : 18 - 25
  • [3] The performance of artificial intelligence large language model-linked chatbots in surgical decision-making for gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Huo, Bright
    Calabrese, Elisa
    Sylla, Patricia
    Kumar, Sunjay
    Ignacio, Romeo C.
    Oviedo, Rodolfo
    Hassan, Imran
    Slater, Bethany J.
    Kaiser, Andreas
    Walsh, Danielle S.
    Vosburg, Wesley
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (05): : 2320 - 2330
  • [4] Artificial Intelligence and Surgical Decision-making
    Loftus, Tyler J.
    Tighe, Patrick J.
    Filiberto, Amanda C.
    Efron, Philip A.
    Brakenridge, Scott C.
    Mohr, Alicia M.
    Rashidi, Parisa
    Upchurch, Gilbert R., Jr.
    Bihorac, Azra
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2020, 155 (02) : 148 - 158
  • [5] Optimization, Decision-making and Artificial Intelligence
    Mittal, Mandeep
    Shah, Nita H.
    [J]. Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [6] NEC AND NEW APPROACH IN OPTIMIZATION PROCESS OF DECISION-MAKING WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
    Dufkova, Andrea
    [J]. ICMT '07: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MILITARY TECHNOLOGIES, 2007, : 426 - 429
  • [7] Artificial intelligence framework for simulating clinical decision-making: A Markov decision process approach
    Bennett, Casey C.
    Hauser, Kris
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2013, 57 (01) : 9 - 19
  • [8] Use of Artificial Intelligence in Regulatory Decision-Making
    Jago, Robert
    Gaag, Anna van der
    Stathis, Kostas
    Petej, Ivan
    Lertvittayakumjorn, Piyawat
    Krishnamurthy, Yamuna
    Gao, Yang
    Silva, Juan Caceres
    Webster, Michelle
    Gallagher, Ann
    Austin, Zubin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING REGULATION, 2021, 12 (03) : 11 - 19
  • [9] Artificial intelligence for decision-making and the future of work
    Dennehy, Denis
    Griva, Anastasia
    Pouloudi, Nancy
    Mantymakid, Matti
    Pappas, Ilias
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2023, 69
  • [10] Algorithms and Decision-Making in Military Artificial Intelligence
    Garcia, Denise
    [J]. GLOBAL SOCIETY, 2024, 38 (01) : 24 - 33