Mixed uncertainty analysis on pumping by peristaltic hearts using Dempster-Shafer theory

被引:0
|
作者
He, Yanyan [1 ]
Battista, Nicholas A. [2 ]
Waldrop, Lindsay D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Texas, Dept Math Comp Sci & Engn, 1155 Union Circle, Denton, TX 76203 USA
[2] Coll New Jersey, Dept Math & Stat, Pennington Rd, Ewing Township, NJ 08618 USA
[3] Chapman Univ, Schmid Coll Sci & Technol, One Univ Dr, Orange, CA 92866 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Aleatory and epistemic uncertainties; Generalized polynomial chaos; Sensitivity analysis; Dempster-Shafer theory; Peristaltic pumping model; Immersed boundary method; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; UNIDIRECTIONAL BLOOD-FLOW; POLYNOMIAL-CHAOS; RANDOM SETS; QUANTIFICATION; VALVELESS; INTERVAL; PROPAGATION; SIMULATIONS; MECHANISM;
D O I
10.1007/s00285-024-02116-6
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In this paper, we introduce the numerical strategy for mixed uncertainty propagation based on probability and Dempster-Shafer theories, and apply it to the computational model of peristalsis in a heart-pumping system. Specifically, the stochastic uncertainty in the system is represented with random variables while epistemic uncertainty is represented using non-probabilistic uncertain variables with belief functions. The mixed uncertainty is propagated through the system, resulting in the uncertainty in the chosen quantities of interest (QoI, such as flow volume, cost of transport and work). With the introduced numerical method, the uncertainty in the statistics of QoIs will be represented using belief functions. With three representative probability distributions consistent with the belief structure, global sensitivity analysis has also been implemented to identify important uncertain factors and the results have been compared between different peristalsis models. To reduce the computational cost, physics constrained generalized polynomial chaos method is adopted to construct cheaper surrogates as approximations for the full simulation.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dempster-Shafer Approach to Temporal Uncertainty
    Elmore, Paul A.
    Petry, Frederick E.
    Yager, Ronald R.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EMERGING TOPICS IN COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 2017, 1 (05): : 316 - 325
  • [22] Requirements for total uncertainty measures in Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence
    Abellan, Joaquin
    Masegosa, Andres
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL SYSTEMS, 2008, 37 (06) : 733 - 747
  • [23] Geospatial Modeling Using Dempster-Shafer Theory
    Elmore, Paul A.
    Petry, Frederick E.
    Yager, Ronald R.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS, 2017, 47 (06) : 1551 - 1561
  • [24] Sensor fusion using Dempster-Shafer theory
    Wu, HD
    Siegel, M
    Stiefelhagen, R
    Yang, J
    IMTC 2002: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH IEEE INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 & 2, 2002, : 7 - 12
  • [25] Object Classification Using Dempster-Shafer Theory
    Harasymowicz-Boggio, B.
    Siemiatkowska, B.
    MECHATRONICS 2013: RECENT TECHNOLOGICAL AND SCIENTIFIC ADVANCES, 2014, : 559 - 565
  • [26] Fundamentals of the Dempster-Shafer Theory
    Peri, Joseph S. J.
    SIGNAL PROCESSING, SENSOR FUSION, AND TARGET RECOGNITION XXI, 2012, 8392
  • [27] Categorification of the Dempster-Shafer Theory
    Peri, Joseph S. J.
    SIGNAL PROCESSING, SENSOR/INFORMATION FUSION, AND TARGET RECOGNITION XXIV, 2015, 9474
  • [28] Sensitivity Analysis of Epistemic Uncertainty on Input Parameters and System Structure Using Dempster-Shafer Theory
    Hou, Yunhui
    ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART B-MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 7 (02):
  • [29] New Cross Entropy on Dempster-Shafer Theory Under Uncertainty
    Khalaj, F.
    Khalaj, M.
    Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.
    Pasha, E.
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL EXTENSION, 2019, 13 (01) : 45 - 66
  • [30] Decision Fusion Using Fuzzy Dempster-Shafer Theory
    Surathong, Somnuek
    Auephanwiriyakul, Sansanee
    Theera-Umpon, Nipon
    RECENT ADVANCES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY 2018, 2019, 769 : 115 - 125