Mixed uncertainty analysis on pumping by peristaltic hearts using Dempster-Shafer theory

被引:0
|
作者
He, Yanyan [1 ]
Battista, Nicholas A. [2 ]
Waldrop, Lindsay D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Texas, Dept Math Comp Sci & Engn, 1155 Union Circle, Denton, TX 76203 USA
[2] Coll New Jersey, Dept Math & Stat, Pennington Rd, Ewing Township, NJ 08618 USA
[3] Chapman Univ, Schmid Coll Sci & Technol, One Univ Dr, Orange, CA 92866 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Aleatory and epistemic uncertainties; Generalized polynomial chaos; Sensitivity analysis; Dempster-Shafer theory; Peristaltic pumping model; Immersed boundary method; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; UNIDIRECTIONAL BLOOD-FLOW; POLYNOMIAL-CHAOS; RANDOM SETS; QUANTIFICATION; VALVELESS; INTERVAL; PROPAGATION; SIMULATIONS; MECHANISM;
D O I
10.1007/s00285-024-02116-6
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In this paper, we introduce the numerical strategy for mixed uncertainty propagation based on probability and Dempster-Shafer theories, and apply it to the computational model of peristalsis in a heart-pumping system. Specifically, the stochastic uncertainty in the system is represented with random variables while epistemic uncertainty is represented using non-probabilistic uncertain variables with belief functions. The mixed uncertainty is propagated through the system, resulting in the uncertainty in the chosen quantities of interest (QoI, such as flow volume, cost of transport and work). With the introduced numerical method, the uncertainty in the statistics of QoIs will be represented using belief functions. With three representative probability distributions consistent with the belief structure, global sensitivity analysis has also been implemented to identify important uncertain factors and the results have been compared between different peristalsis models. To reduce the computational cost, physics constrained generalized polynomial chaos method is adopted to construct cheaper surrogates as approximations for the full simulation.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mixed aleatory and epistemic uncertainty propagation using Dempster-Shafer theory
    He, Yanyan
    Hussaini, M. Yousuff
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2023, 429
  • [2] Uncertainty based on Dempster-Shafer theory
    Xiao, MZ
    Chen, GJ
    ICEMI'2003: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONIC MEASUREMENT & INSTRUMENTS, VOLS 1-3, 2003, : 117 - 120
  • [3] On the computation of uncertainty measure in Dempster-Shafer theory
    Harmanec, D
    Resconi, G
    Klir, GJ
    Pan, Y
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL SYSTEMS, 1996, 25 (02) : 153 - 163
  • [4] A Novel Measure of Uncertainty in the Dempster-Shafer Theory
    Wen, Ke
    Song, Yafei
    Wu, Chunhua
    Li, Tianpeng
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 51550 - 51559
  • [5] UNCERTAINTY IN THE DEMPSTER-SHAFER THEORY - A CRITICAL REEXAMINATION
    KLIR, GJ
    RAMER, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL SYSTEMS, 1990, 18 (02) : 155 - 166
  • [6] Treatment of epistemic uncertainty in conjunction analysis with Dempster-Shafer theory
    Sánchez, Luis
    Vasile, Massimiliano
    Sanvido, Silvia
    Merz, Klaus
    Taillan, Christophe
    Advances in Space Research, 2024, 74 (11) : 5639 - 5686
  • [7] A Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence approach to model uncertainty analysis
    Baraldi, P.
    Zio, E.
    RELIABILITY, RISK AND SAFETY: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS VOLS 1-3, 2010, : 1725 - 1730
  • [8] The analysis of uncertainty of network security risk assessment using Dempster-Shafer theory
    Gao, Huisheng
    Zhu, Jing
    Li, Congcong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2008 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK IN DESIGN, VOLS I AND II, 2008, : 754 - +
  • [9] Nonstandard analysis and Dempster-Shafer theory
    Roesmer, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2000, 15 (02) : 117 - 127
  • [10] Completing a total uncertainty measure in the Dempster-Shafer Theory
    Abellán, J
    Moral, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL SYSTEMS, 1999, 28 (4-5) : 299 - 314