Can the Integration of Water and Fertilizer Promote the Sustainable Development of Rice Production in China?

被引:0
|
作者
Liao, Qin [1 ]
Nie, Jiangxia [1 ]
Yin, Huilai [1 ]
Luo, Yongheng [1 ]
Shu, Chuanhai [1 ]
Cheng, Qingyue [1 ]
Fu, Hao [1 ]
Li, Biao [1 ]
Li, Liangyu [2 ]
Sun, Yongjian [1 ,3 ]
Chen, Zongkui [1 ]
Ma, Jun [1 ,3 ]
Li, Na [4 ]
Zhang, Xiaoli [2 ]
Yang, Zhiyuan [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Agr Univ, Rice Res Inst, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
[2] Chengdu Acad Agr & Forestry Sci, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
[3] Crop Ecophysiol & Cultivat Key Lab Sichuan Prov, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Anim Sci & Technol, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 04期
关键词
energy use efficiency; carbon footprint; greenhouse gas; economic benefits; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS; ENERGY USE; PADDY FIELD; NITROGEN; FERTIGATION; AGRICULTURE; PROVINCE; REGIONS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture14040585
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Rice production is the agricultural activity with the highest energy consumption and carbon emission intensity. Water and fertilizer management constitutes an important part of energy input for rice production and a key factor affecting greenhouse gas emissions from paddy fields. Water-fertilizer integration management (AIM) is an automated water and fertilizer management system for large-scale rice production, which can effectively save water and fertilizer resources. At present, the energy utilization and environmental impact of AIM in rice production are not clear. To clarify whether AIM is a water and fertilizer management measure that combines energy conservation and carbon emission reduction, a comparative study between the widely used farmers' enhanced water and fertilizer management (FEM) in China and AIM was conducted in this paper. Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the rice yield, carbon emission, energy utilization, and economic benefits of the two management methods. The results showed that AIM reduced water and fertilizer inputs, energy inputs, and economic costs by 12.18-28.57%, compared to FEM. The energy utilization efficiency, energy profitability, and energy productivity under AIM were improved by 11.30-12.61%. CH4 and N2O emissions and carbon footprint were reduced by 20.79%, 6.51%, and 16.39%, respectively. Compared with FEM, AIM can effectively improve the utilization efficiency of water and fertilizer resources and reduce carbon emissions. This study presents a mechanized water and fertilizer management approach suitable for large-scale rice production systems in China. By analyzing rice yield, resource utilization efficiency, and environmental benefits, AIM can serve as a crucial management strategy for enhancing productivity, economic returns, and environmental conservation within profitable rice production systems. In the future, further investigation into the impact of AIM on the microbial mechanisms underlying rice yield formation and greenhouse gas emissions is warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pathways to sustainable development: Regional integration and carbon emissions in China
    Xiao, Renrui
    Tan, Guangrong
    Huang, Baocong
    Li, Jin
    Luo, Yuanyue
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 5137 - 5145
  • [42] Potential of optimizing irrigation and fertilization management for sustainable rice production in China
    Liu, Lianhua
    Lian, Zhongmin
    Ouyang, Wei
    Yan, Lingling
    Liu, Hongbin
    Hao, Fanghua
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 432
  • [43] Can water mutual funds aid sustainable development?
    Ibikunle, Gbenga
    Marti-Ballester, Carmen-Pilar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2022, 27 (01) : 1173 - 1190
  • [44] Can Mechanization Promote Green Agricultural Production? An Empirical Analysis of Maize Production in China
    Wang, Yakun
    Jiang, Jingli
    Wang, Dongqing
    You, Xinshang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [45] The role of public agricultural extension services in driving fertilizer use in rice production in China
    Lin, Yang
    Hu, Ruifa
    Zhang, Chao
    Chen, Kevin
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 200
  • [46] Integration of sustainable development and organic mango production: The Vambu project
    Lafleur, G
    Hill, SB
    ORGANIC AGRICULTURE - THE CREDIBLE SOLUTION FOR THE XXIST CENTURY, 1998, : 68 - 73
  • [47] How can local energy communities promote sustainable development in European cities?
    Otamendi-Irizar, Irati
    Grijalba, Olatz
    Arias, Alba
    Pennese, Claudia
    Hernandez, Rufino
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2022, 84
  • [48] What kind of leaders can promote the disclosure of information on the sustainable development goals?
    Garrido-Ruso, Maria
    Aibar-Guzman, Beatriz
    Suarez-Fernandez, Oscar
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 31 (04) : 2694 - 2710
  • [49] Can Reclaimed Water Be Used for Sustainable Food Production in Aquaponics?
    Cifuentes-Torres, Liliana
    Correa-Reyes, Gabriel
    Mendoza-Espinosa, Leopoldo G.
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2021, 12
  • [50] Can green manure contribute to sustainable intensification of rainfed rice production in Madagascar?
    Ranaivoson, Lalaina
    Falconnier, Gatien N.
    Affholder, Francois
    Leroux, Louise
    Autfray, Patrice
    Muller, Bertrand
    Auzoux, Sandrine
    Ripoche, Aude
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2022, 289