Global challenges in the standardization of ethics for trustworthy AI

被引:0
|
作者
Lewis D. [1 ]
Hogan L. [1 ]
Filip D. [1 ]
Wall P.J. [1 ]
机构
[1] ADAPT Centre, Trinity College Dublin
来源
Journal of ICT Standardization | 2020年 / 8卷 / 02期
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Ethics; Stakeholders; Standards; Trustworthy AI;
D O I
10.13052/jicts2245-800X.823
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, we examine the challenges of developing international standards for Trustworthy AI that aim both to be global applicable and to address the ethical questions key to building trust at a commercial and societal level. We begin by examining the validity of grounding standards that aim for international reach on human right agreements, and the need to accommodate variations in prioritization and tradeoffs in implementing rights in different societal and cultural settings. We then examine the major recent proposals from the OECD, the EU and the IEEE on ethical governance of Trustworthy AI systems in terms of their scope and use of normative language. From this analysis, we propose a preliminary minimal model for the functional roles relevant to Trustworthy AI as a framing for further standards development in this area. We also identify the different types of interoperability reference points that may exist between these functional roles and remark on the potential role they could play in future standardization. Finally we examine a current AI standardization effort under ISO/IEC JTC1 to consider how future Trustworthy AI standards may be able to build on existing standards in developing ethical guidelines and in particular on the ISO standard on Social Responsibility. We conclude by proposing some future directions for research and development of Trustworthy AI standards. © 2020 the Author(s). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 150
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Value of Trustworthy AI
    Danks, David
    AIES '19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 AAAI/ACM CONFERENCE ON AI, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY, 2019, : 521 - 522
  • [32] Network of AI and trustworthy: response to Simion and Kelp’s account of trustworthy AI
    Song F.
    Asian Journal of Philosophy, 2 (2):
  • [33] Adaptable robots, ethics, and trust: a qualitative and philosophical exploration of the individual experience of trustworthy AI
    Sheir, Stephanie
    Manzini, Arianna
    Smith, Helen
    Ives, Jonathan
    AI & SOCIETY, 2024, 40 (3) : 1735 - 1748
  • [34] Critically engaging the ethics of AI for a global audience
    Segun, Samuel T.
    ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 23 (02) : 99 - 105
  • [35] Critically engaging the ethics of AI for a global audience
    Samuel T. Segun
    Ethics and Information Technology, 2021, 23 : 99 - 105
  • [36] The Democratic Challenges in Global Governance of AI
    Erman, Eva
    Furendal, Markus
    CURRENT HISTORY, 2025, 124 (858): : 3 - 8
  • [37] Correction to: Mark Coeckelbergh, AI Ethics, Mit Press, 2021Ethics of AI: The Philosophical Challenges
    Filippo Santoni de Sio
    Science and Engineering Ethics, 2021, 27
  • [38] The Challenges and Opportunities of Human-Centered AI for Trustworthy Robots and Autonomous Systems
    He, Hongmei
    Gray, John
    Cangelosi, Angelo
    Meng, Qinggang
    McGinnity, T. Martin
    Mehnen, Jorn
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COGNITIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2022, 14 (04) : 1398 - 1412
  • [39] The Challenges and Opportunities of Human-Centered AI for Trustworthy Robots and Autonomous Systems
    He, Hongmei
    Gray, John
    Cangelosi, Angelo
    Meng, Qinggang
    McGinnity, T. Martin
    Mehnen, Jorn
    IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 2022, 14 (04): : 1398 - 1412
  • [40] Navigating the Ethical Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: An Analysis of Seven Global AI Ethics Policies
    Slimi, Zouhaier
    Carballido, Beatriz Villarejo
    TEM JOURNAL-TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATICS, 2023, 12 (02): : 590 - 602