A review of dynamic optimization in aquaculture production economics

被引:0
|
作者
Dominguez-May, Roger [1 ]
Hernandez, Juan M. [2 ]
Velazquez-Abunader, Ivan [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Politecn Nacl, Ctr Invest & Estudios Avanzados, Dept Recursos Mar, Km 6 Carretera Antigua Progreso, Merida 97201, Yucatan, Mexico
[2] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Dept Metodos Cuantitat Econ, Campus Tarifa, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain
关键词
aquaculture bioeconomic; dynamic programming; optimal control theory; optimal feeding; optimization; production; OPTIMAL HARVESTING TIME; OPTIMAL MANAGEMENT; WATER TEMPERATURE; NUMERICAL-METHODS; SHRIMP CULTURE; MODEL; FISH; SIZE; FISHERIES; TOOLBOX;
D O I
10.1111/raq.12918
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Dynamic optimization (DO) has been applied to aquaculture industry to determine optimal management strategies of aquaculture production systems. Optimal control of feeding, optimal stocking successions, and harvesting time among other factors has been studied. This work shows a review of the application of optimal control theory (OCT) and dynamic programming in economics and management of aquaculture. The Pontriagyn's maximum principle and the Bellman's optimality are the most commonly used mechanisms to solve control problems that optimize the producer's benefit or cost. Recently, model-based predictive control has also been applied. Such tools have been used in aspects involving the design, planning, and monitoring of variables relevant to the optimal management of the culture system. It was found that in aquaculture there is low scientific productivity in the application of DO in bioeconomic models. In this review, an example of OCT applied to the control of feeding of farmed tilapia using a bioeconomic model is shown. DO represents a useful tool for optimal decision-making and this review discusses the implications of the use of DO in aquaculture and recommendations for its use in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dynamic Optimization for Monoclonal Antibody Production
    Kaysfeld, Morten Wahlgreen
    Kumar, Deepak
    Nielsen, Marcus Krogh
    Jorgensen, John Bagterp
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2023, 56 (02): : 6229 - 6234
  • [32] Economics of irrigation water conservation: Dynamic optimization for consumption and investment
    Habteyes, Befekadu Goraw
    Ward, Frank A.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 258
  • [33] A Modified Dynamic Optimization Model of Quality Economics with Learning Effects
    Cui Li
    Hou Hanpo
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & SYSTEM DYNAMICS, VOL 1, 2009, : 177 - 182
  • [34] Methods and applications of dynamic optimization techniques in environmental and resource economics
    Goetz, RU
    Keusch, A
    JAHRBUCHER FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE UND STATISTIK, 1999, 219 (3-4): : 326 - 343
  • [35] Ecological Economics and Dynamic Games: A Systematic Literature Review
    Chenavaz, Regis Y.
    Dimitrov, Stanko
    Li, Shoude
    INTERNATIONAL GAME THEORY REVIEW, 2024,
  • [36] The contribution of aquaculture systems to global aquaculture production
    Verdegem, Marc
    Buschmann, Alejandro H.
    Latt, U. Win
    Dalsgaard, Anne J. T.
    Lovatelli, Alessandro
    JOURNAL OF THE WORLD AQUACULTURE SOCIETY, 2023, 54 (02) : 206 - 250
  • [37] Book Review: Economics and Ecology in Agriculture and Marine Production
    David Pearce
    Biodiversity & Conservation, 2004, 13 (10) : 1995 - 1996
  • [38] Design and optimization of a recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) for live feed production in aquaculture: a case study using Daphnia magna
    C. P. Sreevidya
    Ajitha V
    Manoj Kumar T.M
    Anjaly M.A
    Alphy T. Aliyas
    Manomi Sarasan
    Shibin S.P
    I. S. Bright Singh
    Jayesh Puthumana
    Aquaculture International, 2025, 33 (3)
  • [39] Dynamic economics: theoretical and statistical studies of demand, production and prices
    Freeman, H. A.
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1935, 25 (03): : 520 - 520
  • [40] Dynamic Economics: Theoretical and Statistical Studies of Demand, Production and Prices
    Tintner, Gerhard
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1936, 44 (03) : 404 - 409