Analysis of morphological differences in five large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) populations

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Yu-Qing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guo, Hua-Yang [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Liu, Bao-Suo [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Zhang, Nan [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Zhu, Ke-Cheng [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Zhang, Dian-chang [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Fishery Sci, Key Lab South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploita, Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Guangzhou 510300, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Fishery Sci, South China Sea Fisheries Res Inst, Guangzhou 510300, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Dalian Ocean Univ, Coll Fisheries, Dalian 116023, Peoples R China
[4] Sanya Trop Fisheries Res Inst, Sanya 572018, Peoples R China
[5] Guangdong Prov Engineer Technol Res Ctr Marine Bio, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Larimichthys crocea; Morphological difference; Multivariate analysis; MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS; DIFFERENTIATION; SALMON; STOCKS;
D O I
10.46989/001c.91049
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
To explore the morphological and phenotypic characteristics and differences among different populations of Larimichthys crocea, traditional morphological measurements were carried out on three wild populations from Zhoushan, Xiamen and Zhanjiang and two farmed populations from Ningde and Wenzhou. Seven morphological parameters of five L. crocea populations were compared and analyzed. The results of one-way ANOVA showed significant differences in trunk and caudal stalk among the five populations. The contribution rates of the first five principal components to the total difference among different populations were 29.984%, 18.462%, 17.234%, 12.167%, and 9.904%, respectively, and the cumulative contribution rates were 87.751%. Trunk can be used to distinguish different geographic populations best. The cluster analysis results showed that the distance between wild populations was the closest, while the distance between farmed populations was far. The step discriminant method established the classification discriminant function of 5 populations. The discriminant accuracy P1 was 78.3%-92.7%, the discriminant accuracy P2 was 76.4%-96.5%, and the comprehensive recognition rate was 99.3%. The discriminant accuracy of this method was high, and it could provide a reference for the differentiation of different populations of L. crocea. This study provided basic morphological data for identifying a large yellow croaker population, protecting germplasm resources, and breeding improved varieties.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Nanoplastics impair the intestinal health of the juvenile large yellow croaker Larimichthys crocea
    Gu, Huaxin
    Wang, Shixiu
    Wang, Xinghuo
    Yu, Xiang
    Hu, Menghong
    Huang, Wei
    Wang, Youji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2020, 397 (397)
  • [32] Family structure and phylogenetic analysis of odorant receptor genes in the large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea)
    Yingsong Zhou
    Xiaojun Yan
    Shanliang Xu
    Peng Zhu
    Xianxing He
    Jianxin Liu
    [J]. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 11
  • [33] Morphological Characterization and Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis of Kudoa iwatai from Large Yellow Croaker (Larimichthys crocea) as a New Host in China
    Li, Xiao-Bing
    He, Jie
    Ma, Rong-Rong
    Sun, Fu-Ying
    Wu, Wen-Xin
    Luo, Hua-Ming
    Bai, Lu-Huai
    Qian, Dong
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [34] Development and evaluation of liquid SNP array for large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea)
    Wang, Jiaying
    Miao, Lingwei
    Chen, Baohua
    Zhao, Ji
    Ke, Qiaozhen
    Pu, Fei
    Zhou, Tao
    Xu, Peng
    [J]. AQUACULTURE, 2023, 563
  • [35] Effects of transportation on physiological indices and metabolomics of the large yellow croaker Larimichthys crocea
    Zhou, Yangchen
    Yin, Xiaolong
    Li, Weiye
    Gao, Yang
    Chu, Zhangjie
    [J]. FISH PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2023, 49 (04) : 641 - 654
  • [36] Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in large yellow croaker, Larimichthys crocea
    Ye Hua
    Ren Peng
    Zhao Guangtai
    Yue Genhua
    Wang Zhiyong
    [J]. ACTA OCEANOLOGICA SINICA, 2012, 31 (04) : 149 - 153
  • [37] Skeletal muscle feature of different populations in large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea): from an epigenetic point of view
    Xie, Shangwei
    Jiang, Lihua
    Song, Weihua
    Zheng, Jialang
    Liu, Yifan
    Chen, Shun
    Yan, Xiaojun
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MOLECULAR BIOSCIENCES, 2024, 11
  • [38] Parentage assignment and parental contribution analysis in large yellow croaker Larimichthys crocea using microsatellite markers
    Liu, Xiande
    Zhao, Guangtai
    Wang, Zhiyong
    Cai, Mingyi
    Ye, Hua
    Wang, Qiurong
    [J]. CURRENT ZOOLOGY, 2012, 58 (02) : 244 - 249
  • [39] Genetic analysis of farmed and wild stocks of large yellow croaker Larimichthys crocea by using microsatellite markers
    Wu, Xiang Wei
    Liu, Xian De
    Cai, Ming Yi
    Ye, Xiao Jun
    Wang, Zhi Yong
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2011, 10 (30): : 5773 - 5784
  • [40] Proteomics analysis of skin coloration of large yellow croaker Larimichthys crocea fed different dietary carotenoids
    Luo, Kai
    Li, Jun
    Chen, Jia
    Pan, Ying
    Zhang, Yanjiao
    Zhou, Huihui
    Zhang, Wenbing
    Mai, Kangsen
    [J]. AQUACULTURE NUTRITION, 2020, 26 (06) : 1981 - 1993