Economic Evaluation of COVID-19 Immunization Strategies: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

被引:0
|
作者
Chang, Enxue [1 ]
Li, Haofei [1 ]
Zheng, Wanji [1 ]
Zhou, Lan [1 ]
Jia, Yanni [1 ]
Gu, Wen [1 ]
Cao, Yiyin [1 ]
Zhu, Xiaoying [2 ,3 ]
Xu, Juan [4 ]
Liu, Bo [5 ]
You, Mao [6 ]
Liu, Kejun [6 ]
Wang, Mingsi [1 ]
Huang, Weidong [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Med Univ, Sch Hlth Management, Harbin, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Chinese Med, Sch Elderly Care Serv & Management, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Melbourne, Nossal Inst Global Hlth, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Shenzhen Ctr, Canc Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[5] Shenzhen Hlth Capac Bldg & Continuing Educ Ctr, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[6] Natl Hlth Dev Res Ctr, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
COST-EFFECTIVENESS; PUBLIC-HEALTH; VACCINATION; VACCINES; OUTCOMES; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1007/s40258-024-00880-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThis study aimed to systematically assess global economic evaluation studies on COVID-19 vaccination, offer valuable insights for future economic evaluations, and assist policymakers in making evidence-based decisions regarding the implementation of COVID-19 vaccination.MethodsSearches were performed from January 2020 to September 2023 across seven English databases (PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, EBSCO, KCL-Korean Journal Dataset, SciELO Citation Index, and Derwent Innovations Index) and three Chinese databases (Wanfang Data, China Science and Technology Journal, and CNKI). Rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Data were extracted from eligible studies using a standardized data collection form, with the reporting quality of these studies assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022).ResultsOf the 40 studies included in the final review, the overall reporting quality was good, evidenced by a mean score of 22.6 (ranging from 10.5 to 28). Given the significant heterogeneity in fundamental aspects among the studies reviewed, a narrative synthesis was conducted. Most of these studies adopted a health system or societal perspective. They predominantly utilized a composite model, merging dynamic and static methods, within short to medium-term time horizons to simulate various vaccination strategies. The research strategies varied among studies, investigating different doses, dosages, brands, mechanisms, efficacies, vaccination coverage rates, deployment speeds, and priority target groups. Three pivotal parameters notably influenced the evaluation results: the vaccine's effectiveness, its cost, and the basic reproductive number (R0). Despite variations in model structures, baseline parameters, and assumptions utilized, all studies identified a general trend that COVID-19 vaccination is cost-effective compared to no vaccination or intervention.ConclusionsThe current review confirmed that COVID-19 vaccination is a cost-effective alternative in preventing and controlling COVID-19. In addition, it highlights the profound impact of variables such as dose size, target population, vaccine efficacy, speed of vaccination, and diversity of vaccine brands and mechanisms on cost effectiveness, and also proposes practical and effective strategies for improving COVID-19 vaccination campaigns from the perspective of economic evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 470
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Models of COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation: a systematic literature search and narrative review
    Saadi, Nuru
    Chi, Y-Ling
    Ghosh, Srobana
    Eggo, Rosalind M.
    McCarthy, Ciara, V
    Quaife, Matthew
    Dawa, Jeanette
    Jit, Mark
    Vassall, Anna
    BMC MEDICINE, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [42] Implementations and strategies of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review
    Stefania De Simone
    Massimo Franco
    Giuseppe Servillo
    Maria Vargas
    BMC Health Services Research, 22
  • [43] Implementations and strategies of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review
    De Simone, Stefania
    Franco, Massimo
    Servillo, Giuseppe
    Vargas, Maria
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [44] Hemoperfusion and blood purification strategies in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review
    Sanfilippo, Filippo
    Martucci, Gennaro
    La Via, Luigi
    Cuttone, Giuseppe
    Dimarco, Giorgio
    Pulizzi, Carla
    Arcadipane, Antonio
    Astuto, Marinella
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2021, 45 (12) : 1466 - 1476
  • [45] Evaluation of Hematological Changes During COVID-19: A Systematic Review
    Aljebaly, Fatimah Suliman
    BAHRAIN MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2022, 44 (04) : 1230 - 1234
  • [46] TREATMENTS AND DIAGNOSTICS FOR COVID-19: A LIVING SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS
    Elvidge, J.
    Summerfield, A.
    Nicholls, D.
    Dawoud, D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S423 - S423
  • [47] Diagnostics and Treatments of COVID-19: A Living Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations
    Elvidge, Jamie
    Summerfield, Ashley
    Nicholls, David
    Dawoud, Dalia
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (05) : 773 - 784
  • [48] ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS OF PUBLIC HEALTH INTERVENTIONS ON COVID-19: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Rayanakorn, A.
    Leong, S. L.
    Chaiprom, P.
    Lee, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S477 - S477
  • [49] A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Health Economic Evaluations of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening Strategies
    Anh Le Tuan Nguyen
    Hoa Thi Thu Nguyen
    Yee, Kwang Chien
    Palmer, Andrew J.
    Blizzard, Christopher Leigh
    de Graaff, Barbara
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 (05) : 733 - 743
  • [50] Diagnostic assays for COVID-19: a narrative review
    Zhang Liding
    Liang Xiaohan
    Li Yanqing
    Zheng Hua
    Qu Wensheng
    Wang Baofeng
    Luo Haiming
    Britton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics
    MoE Key Laboratory for Biomedical Photonics
    Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
    Department of Neurology
    Department of Neurosurgery
    生物组学研究杂志(英文), 2020, 03 (04) : 123 - 134