Reply to “Beyond microbial carbon use efficiency”

被引：0

作者：

Feng Tao ^{[1
]}

Johannes Lehmann ^{[2
]}

YingPing Wang ^{[3
]}

Lifen Jiang ^{[2
]}

Bernhard Ahrens ^{[4
]}

Kostiantyn Viatkin ^{[2
]}

Stefano Manzoni ^{[5
]}

Benjamin ZHoulton ^{[1
,6
]}

Yuanyuan Huang ^{[7
]}

Xiaomeng Huang ^{[8
]}

Yiqi Luo ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology,Cornell University

[2] Soil and Crop Sciences Section, School of Integrative Plant Science,Cornell University

[3] CSIRO Environment

[4] Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry

[5] Department of Physical Geography and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University

[6] Department of Global Development, Cornell University

[7] Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences

[8] Department of Earth System Science,Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modelling, Institute for Global Change Studies, Tsinghua

来源：

NationalScienceReview | 2024年 / 11卷 / 04期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

X144 [环境地理学]; S154.3 [土壤微生物学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

<正>In their commentary, Xiao et al.[1]cautioned that the conclusions on the critical role of microbial carbon use efficiency (CUE) in global soil organic carbon (SOC) storage in the paper by Tao et al.[2] might be too simplistic.They claimed that Tao et al.’s study lacked mechanistic consideration of SOC formation and excluded important data sets.Xiao et al. brought up important points,which can be largely reconciled with our findings by understanding the differences in expressing processes in empirical studies and in models.

引用

页码：35 / 37

页数：3

共 50 条

[21] Assessing microbial residues in soil as a potential carbon sink and moderator of carbon use efficiency
Geyer, Kevin
Schnecker, Joerg
Grandy, A. Stuart
Richter, Andreas
Frey, Serita
BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, 2020, 151 (2-3) : 237 - 249
[22] Deforestation for agriculture increases microbial carbon use efficiency in subarctic soils
Schroeder, Julia
Peplau, Tino
Pennekamp, Frank
Gregorich, Edward
Tebbe, Christoph C.
Poeplau, Christopher
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 2024, 60 (01) : 17 - 34
[23] Biotic Interactions in Soil are Underestimated Drivers of Microbial Carbon Use Efficiency
Iven, Helene
Walker, Tom W. N.
Anthony, Mark
CURRENT MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 80 (01)
[24] Biotic and abiotic factors affecting soil microbial carbon use efficiency
Tang, Xinyu
Li, Zhenxin
Yuan, Jihong
Yu, Weirui
Luo, Wenbo
FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2024, 15
[25] Environmental and stoichiometric controls on microbial carbon-use efficiency in soils
Manzoni, Stefano
Taylor, Philip
Richter, Andreas
Porporato, Amilcare
Agren, Goran I.
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2012, 196 (01) : 79 - 91
[26] Nutrient additions have minor impact on microbial carbon use efficiency
Jiang, Qunou
Yan, Lingyuan
Wang, Huimin
Dai, Xiaoqin
Meng, Shengwang
Fu, Xiaoli
Yang, Fengting
Ma, Zeqing
Shi, Wenjiao
Lv, Wenjun
Wang, Yuxin
Gao, Decai
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 385
[27] Elevational patterns of microbial carbon use efficiency in a subtropical mountain forest
Wu, Guopeng
Su, Yangui
Wang, Jingjing
Lin, Sinuo
Huang, Zhengyi
Huang, Gang
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 2024, 60 (01) : 5 - 15
[28] Responses of soil microbial carbon use efficiency to warming: Review and prospects
Qiufang Zhang
Wenkuan Qin
Jiguang Feng
Biao Zhu
Soil Ecology Letters, 2022, (04) : 307 - 318
[29] Elevational patterns of microbial carbon use efficiency in a subtropical mountain forest
Guopeng Wu
Yangui Su
Jingjing Wang
Sinuo Lin
Zhengyi Huang
Gang Huang
Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2024, 60 : 5 - 15
[30] Responses of soil microbial carbon use efficiency to warming: Review and prospects
Qiufang Zhang
Wenkuan Qin
Jiguang Feng
Biao Zhu
Soil Ecology Letters, 2022, 4 : 307 - 318

← 1 2 3 4 5 →