Probability of scour depth exceedance owing to hydrologic uncertainty

被引:62
|
作者
Briaud, J. -L. [1 ]
Brandimarte, L. [2 ]
Wang, J. [3 ]
D'Odorico, P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Civil Engn, College Stn, TX 77845 USA
[2] Univ Bologna, Fac Engn, I-40136 Bologna, Italy
[3] Fugro, Houston, TX 77074 USA
[4] Univ Virginia, Dept Environm Sci, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
关键词
Scour; Risk; Bridges; Foundations; Hydrograph; Water velocity; Time effect;
D O I
10.1080/17499510701398844
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The average risk of a bridge over water in the USA collapsing from scour during its 75 years design life is estimated at 3.7 x 10(-3). This risk makes scour of foundations the number one cause of bridge collapse and 3 times larger than the next cause of bridge collapse, which is collisions. The current paper presents a site specific method to estimate the probability that a certain scour depth will be exceeded during the life of a bridge. The methodology is limited to some uncertainties associated with the randomness of hydrologic conditions. It does not include uncertainties associated with other input parameters, such as geometry and soil erodibility or uncertainties associated with the scour prediction model. The SRICOS-EFA method is used as the reference method to predict the scour depth. This method requires three inputs: the hydraulic parameters (e.g. velocity hydrograph), the geometry parameters (e.g. pier size) and the soil erodibility parameters (e.g. erosion function). The input is used together with the program to generate the scour depth versus time over the period of interest. The final scour depth is that reached at the end of the specified period. This paper proposes a probabilistic framework to present the final scour depth as a cumulative density function. The cumulative density function of the flow is sampled randomly to give a future hydrograph, which has the same mean and standard deviation as the original hydrograph. For this synthetic hydrograph a final scour depth is obtained by using SRICOS-EFA. Thousands of equally likely hydrographs are generated and the corresponding final scour depths are organized in a distribution. That final scour depth distribution gives the probability that a chosen scour depth will be exceeded.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 88
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A METHOD TO CALCULATE THE PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDANCE OF THE DESIGN WAVE HEIGHT
    VANHETEREN, J
    BRUINSMA, J
    COASTAL ENGINEERING, 1981, 5 (01) : 83 - 91
  • [32] Application of Buffered Probability of Exceedance in Reliability Optimization Problems*
    G. M. Zrazhevsky
    A. N. Golodnikov
    S. P. Uryasev
    A. G. Zrazhevsky
    Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 2020, 56 : 476 - 484
  • [33] HYDROLOGIC EVALUATIONS IN BRIDGE PIER SCOUR DESIGN - DISCUSSION
    ROWE, RR
    JOURNAL OF THE HYDRAULICS DIVISION-ASCE, 1974, 100 (NHY8): : 1190 - 1192
  • [34] HYDROLOGIC EVALUATIONS IN BRIDGE PIER SCOUR DESIGN - CLOSURE
    KLINGEMAN, PC
    JOURNAL OF THE HYDRAULICS DIVISION-ASCE, 1975, 101 (NHY3): : 545 - 546
  • [35] ESTIMATE OF EXCEEDANCE PROBABILITY OF TSUNAMI OCCURRENCE IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC
    NAKAMURA, S
    MARINE GEODESY, 1986, 10 (02) : 195 - 209
  • [36] Scour Depth at Bridges: Method Including Soil Properties. I: Maximum Scour Depth Prediction
    Briaud, Jean-Louis
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 141 (02)
  • [37] Estimating uncertainty in the current critical loads exceedance models
    Smith, RI
    Hall, JR
    Howard, DC
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1995, 85 (04): : 2503 - 2508
  • [38] A Theoretically Derived Probability Distribution of Scour
    Manfreda, Salvatore
    Link, Oscar
    Pizarro, Alonso
    WATER, 2018, 10 (11)
  • [39] Uncertainty Quantification of Hydrologic Model
    Vallam, P.
    Qin, X. S.
    Yu, J. J.
    5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND DEVELOPMENT - ICESD 2014, 2014, 10 : 219 - 223
  • [40] REDUCING HYDROLOGIC PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY
    Tung, Yeou-Koung
    Mays, Larry W.
    Journal of the Water Resources Planning and Management Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, 1981, 107 (01): : 245 - 262