Buying organic - decision-making heuristics and empirical evidence from Germany

被引:25
|
作者
Moser, Andrea K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Pforzheim Univ, Inst Ind Ecol, Pforzheim, Germany
[2] Leuphana Univ Lueneburg, Ctr Sustainabil Management, Luneburg, Germany
关键词
Sustainability; Motivation; Heuristics; Green; Organic; Attitude-behavior gap;
D O I
10.1108/JCM-04-2016-1790
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - Identifying the drivers that positively influence consumption of organic products is of utmost importance to reach consumers beyond the niche. Therefore, this study aims to propose an innovative framework which conceptualizes motivating beliefs and a simple decision-making heuristic as predictors of buying organic. Design/methodology/approach - A structural equation approach is applied. Data were obtained from a nationwide panel (n = 1,760) and included survey data and scanner data for five different food categories. Findings - The model is supported by actual purchasing data in all categories. While beliefs explained about 75 per cent of the variance in the decision-making heuristic for organic products, the heuristic in turn predicted up to 20 per cent of the variance in buying behavior. Research limitations/implications - Further research should aim to validate the proposed constructs and relationships and refine the factors. Practical implications - Consumers have to understand and value the benefits of organic products. Self-interested and environmental beliefs are equally strong motivations which can be seen as an opportunity for marketing. Originality/value - The results contribute to understanding the structure and the impact of heuristics and quantify the competing beliefs by which heuristics are driven.
引用
收藏
页码:552 / 561
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Claims About Surrogate Decision-Making Accuracy Require Empirical Evidence
    Feltz, Adam
    Abt, Taylor
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2012, 12 (10): : 41 - 43
  • [32] Heuristics as Decision-making Habits of Autonomous Sensorimotor Agents
    Batta, Erasmo
    Stephens, Christopher
    ALIFE 2019: THE 2019 CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL LIFE, 2019, : 72 - 78
  • [33] On Human Decision-Making Heuristics and Algorithm Design in Engineering
    Leonard, Naomi Ehrich
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2014, 102 (04) : 572 - 573
  • [34] Consensus decision-making: performance of heuristics and mental models
    Tomlin, Damon
    EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2021, 42 (04) : 316 - 330
  • [35] Decision-making heuristics and biases across the life span
    Strough, JoNell
    Karns, Tara E.
    Schlosnagle, Leo
    DECISION MAKING OVER THE LIFE SPAN, 2011, 1235 : 57 - 74
  • [36] Clinical decision-making: heuristics and cognitive biases for the ophthalmologist
    Hussain, Ahsen
    Oestreicher, James
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 63 (01) : 119 - 124
  • [37] Guest editorial: Decision-making and heuristics in business relationships
    Guercini, Simone
    La Rocca, Antonella
    Mouzas, Stefanos
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2024, 62 (11) : 3373 - 3382
  • [38] Heuristics contribute to sensorimotor decision-making under risk
    Adkins, Tyler
    Lewis, Richard
    Lee, Taraz
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2022, 29 (01) : 145 - 158
  • [39] The Inverse Invisible Hand and Heuristics in Managerial Decision-Making
    Vilks, Arnis
    PHILOSOPHY OF MANAGEMENT, 2018, 17 (02) : 137 - 147
  • [40] Medicine and heuristics: cognitive biases and medical decision-making
    Whelehan, Dale F.
    Conlon, Kevin C.
    Ridgway, Paul F.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 189 (04) : 1477 - 1484