Fragility curves in operational dike reliability assessment

被引:20
|
作者
Bachmann, D. [1 ]
Huber, N. P. [2 ]
Johann, G. [3 ]
Schuettrumpf, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Hydraul Engn & Water Resources Management, Aachen, Germany
[2] Bundesanstalt Wasserbau W2 Binnen, Karlsruhe, Germany
[3] Emschergenossensch Lippeverband, Essen, Germany
关键词
operational flood management; reliability analysis; dike failure; fragility curve;
D O I
10.1080/17499518.2013.767664
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Operational flood prediction and flood risk assessment have become important components of flood management. One main aspect is the reliability assessment of the flood defence line during a flood event. This is generally performed by a comparison of the water level in the river to the crest height of the dikes whilst taking only hydraulic and geometric aspects into account. Additional information about material zones and material parameters are often available. However, these data are not in an appropriate shape when deriving the reliability of the flood defence line. This paper outlines how the fragility curve of a dike section is used to appropriately integrate geostatic and geohydraulic dike characteristics into operational flood management systems. Fragility curves are the result of a model-based reliability analysis and they summarise the dike performance depending on the water level. Failure modes such as piping or slope failure are included. In a case study, fragility curves for dike sections along the River Emscher (Germany) are determined. Their practical implementation in an operational flood management system shows an improvement in the operational reliability assessment due to the additional information taken into account. The use of fragility curves also supports the decision-making processes when emergency flood protection measures are required.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 60
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of the Operational Reliability of Underground Transport and Technological Machines
    Chibukhchyan, S.S.
    Journal of Machinery Manufacture and Reliability, 2024, 53 (07) : 733 - 737
  • [22] Understanding Theories and Methods on Equipment Operational Reliability Assessment
    Zhang, Heng
    Zhang, Xin
    Liu, Zhiwen
    Miao, Qiang
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SENSING, DIAGNOSTICS, PROGNOSTICS, AND CONTROL (SDPC), 2017, : 367 - 370
  • [23] Subjective operational reliability assessment of maritime transportation system
    Gaonkar, Rajesh S. Prabhu
    Xie, Min
    Ng, Mien Ming
    Habibullah, Mohamed Salahuddin
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (11) : 13835 - 13846
  • [24] Reliability worth assessment of composite system for operational purposes
    Ma, X
    Yang, JY
    Xiao, XC
    Zhao, HR
    POWERCON 2002: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 1249 - 1253
  • [25] OPERATIONAL RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF ADAPTIVE-CONTROL STRATEGIES
    LIANG, E
    HUSSEINY, AA
    RODRIGUEZ, RJ
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 1989, 16 (02) : 73 - 85
  • [26] Software Reliability Assessment Based on the Evaluation of Operational Experience
    Soehnlein, Sven
    Saglietti, Francesca
    Bitzer, Frank
    Meitner, Matthias
    Baryschew, Siegfried
    MEASUREMENT, MODELLING, AND EVALUATION OF COMPUTING SYSTEMS AND DEPENDABILITY AND FAULT TOLERANCE, 2010, 5987 : 24 - +
  • [27] Software Reliability Assessment by Statistical Analysis of Operational Experience
    Sohnlein, Sven
    Saglietti, Francesca
    ERCIM NEWS, 2008, (75): : 17 - 17
  • [28] Operational reliability assessment of an aircraft environmental control system
    Jenab, K.
    Rashidi, K.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2009, 94 (02) : 456 - 462
  • [29] Practical derivation of operational dike failure probabilities
    Wojciechowska, Karolina
    Kok, Matthijs
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2013, 113 : 122 - 130
  • [30] Are seismic fragility curves fragile?
    Grigoriu, M.
    Radu, A.
    PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2021, 63