SEISMIC STRESS RESPONSES OF SOYBEAN TO DIFFERENT PHOTOSYNTHETIC PHOTON FLUX

被引:9
|
作者
JONES, RS [1 ]
COE, LL [1 ]
MONTGOMERY, L [1 ]
MITCHELL, CA [1 ]
机构
[1] PURDUE UNIV,CTR PLANT ENVIRONM STRESS PHYSIOL,DEPT HORT,W LAFAYETTE,IN 47907
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
Glycine max (L.) Merr. cv. Century 84; Mechanical stress; Photosynthetic photon flux; Seismic stress; Soybean;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088075
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Physical agitation applied as periodic seismic stress (shaking) reduced stem clongation, leaf expansion, and biomass accumulation by vegetative soybeans. Level of photon flux (PPF) influenced the type and extent of plant response to mechanical stress. Plant parts responded differently as PPF varied between 135 and 592 μmol m-2 S-1. Stem length was significantly reduced by seismic stress at 135 μmol m-2 s-1 but this effect was insignificant at higher PPFs. Reduced stem length resulted from an inhibition of internode elongation. Stem diameter was unaffected by stress at the PPFs tested. In contrast to effects on stem elongation, leaf area was insensitive to stress treatments at 135 μmol m-2 S-1 but was progressively inhibited by stress as PPF increased. Statistically significant reductions in shoot f. wt and d. wt by seismic stress occurred only at 295 μmol m-2 S-1. Root biomass accumulation was not affected by seismic stress at any PPF used in this study. © 1990 Annals of Botany Company.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 622
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Observation and estimation of photosynthetic photon flux density in Southern China
    Zhongmin Zhu
    Lunche Wang
    Wei Gong
    Yu Xiong
    Bo Hu
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2015, 120 : 701 - 712
  • [32] Different Physiological and Photosynthetic Responses of Soybean and Mungbean at the Initial Flowering Stage under Low-Temperature Stress to Uniconazole S3307
    Zhao, H. H.
    Zheng, D. F.
    Feng, N. J.
    Wang, S. Q.
    Guo, T.
    Liang, X. L.
    Shan, Y.
    Wang, X. X.
    Ding, K. X.
    Li, Z. J.
    Yang, H.
    Xiang, H. T.
    Xu, L.
    Zhao, J. J.
    Gu, X.
    Xu, J. F.
    Zhao, X. Q.
    Zhang, M. M.
    Yao, L. L.
    Wang, Q. S.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 69 (06)
  • [33] EFFECT OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC PHOTON FLUX-DENSITY ON CARBOXYLATION EFFICIENCY
    WEBER, JA
    TENHUNEN, JD
    GATES, DM
    LANGE, OL
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 85 (01) : 109 - 114
  • [34] Photosynthetic responses of corn and soybean to foliar application of salicylates
    Khan, W
    Prithiviraj, B
    Smith, DL
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 160 (05) : 485 - 492
  • [35] PHOTOSYNTHETIC RESPONSES OF GROUNDNUT TO MOISTURE STRESS
    SHARMA, P
    NISHA
    MALIK, CP
    PHOTOSYNTHETICA, 1993, 29 (01) : 157 - 160
  • [36] Enhancement of phenylpropanoid enzymes and lignin in Phalaenopsis orchid and their influence on plant acclimatisation at different levels of photosynthetic photon flux
    Ali, Mohammad Babar
    Khatun, Serida
    Hahn, Eun-Joo
    Paek, Kee-Yoeup
    PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 2006, 49 (2-3) : 137 - 146
  • [37] Enhancement of phenylpropanoid enzymes and lignin in Phalaenopsis orchid and their influence on plant acclimatisation at different levels of photosynthetic photon flux
    Mohammad Babar Ali
    Serida Khatun
    Eun-Joo Hahn
    Kee-Yoeup Paek
    Plant Growth Regulation, 2006, 49 : 137 - 146
  • [38] PHOTOSYNTHETIC ACTIVITY AND TRANSPIRATION RATE OF AZOLLA UNDER DECLINING PHOTOSYNTHETIC PHOTON FLUX-DENSITY
    LALES, JS
    LAPITAN, MA
    PHOTOSYNTHESIS RESEARCH, 1992, 34 (01) : 233 - 233
  • [39] The Difference of Photosynthetic Responses to the Cadmium Stress Between a Wild Soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. et Zucc.) and a Cultivated Soybean
    Zhongcai Xue
    Huiyuan Gao
    Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2017, 99 : 405 - 410
  • [40] The Difference of Photosynthetic Responses to the Cadmium Stress Between a Wild Soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. et Zucc.) and a Cultivated Soybean
    Xue, Zhongcai
    Gao, Huiyuan
    BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2017, 99 (03) : 405 - 410