The Effects of Tooth Extraction and Nonextraction on the Soft Tissue Profile in Patients With Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

被引:0
|
作者
Aydemir, Halise [1 ]
Nebioglu-Dalci, Oyku [2 ]
Altug, Ayse Tuba [3 ]
Toygar-Memikoglu, Ufuk [3 ]
机构
[1] Turgut Ozal Univ, Oral & Dent Hlth Care Ctr, Alparslan Turkes Caddesi 57, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Ankara, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Class II division 2 malocclusion; Digital planimeter; Soft tissue profile;
D O I
10.13076/TJO-D-14-00015
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine and compare change in the position and area of the upper and lower lips in patients with Class II division 2 malocclusion treated with and without tooth extraction. Materials and Method: This retrospective study included 40 female adolescent patients with Class II division 2 malocclusion who were divided into an extraction treatment group (group E, n=20) and a nonextraction treatment group (group NE, n=20). Pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2) cephalometric variables, and upper-lower lip area (via digital planimeter) were measured on lateral cephalometric radiographs. For soft tissue profile area measurement the upper lip was divided into 2 parts (area 1 and 2), and the lower lip was divided into 3 parts (area 3, 4, and 5). The paired t test was used to determine intragroup differences, and the Student t test was used to determine intergroup differences. Results: Mean age in group E was 15.8 years vs 15.4 years in group NE. A wide range of individual responses to the treatment protocols were observed, and none of the skeletal or soft tissue changes differed significantly between the groups. Conclusion: Despite great variability in posttreatment soft tissue changes-including area measurements-the mean values for all measurements were similar in group E and group NE. Nonetheless, due to the observed variation in soft tissue response, we think that treatment planning should be carefully tailored to the needs of each patient.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 69
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Long-term occlusal and soft-tissue profile outcomes after treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with fixed appliances
    McGuinness, Niall J. P.
    Burden, Donald J.
    Hunt, Orlagh T.
    Johnston, Chris D.
    Stevenson, Mike
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 139 (03) : 362 - 368
  • [42] Maxillary Canine Tooth Extraction for Class 2 Malocclusion in a Dog
    Angel, Molly
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DENTISTRY, 2016, 33 (02) : 112 - 116
  • [43] Dentoskeletal and Soft Tissue Effects of Mini-implants in Class II division 1 Patients
    Ulpadhyay, Madhur
    Yadav, Sumit
    Nagaraj, K.
    Nanda, Ravindra
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2009, 79 (02) : 240 - 247
  • [44] Improving lip aesthetics in the face profile after treatment of class II, division 2 malocclusion
    Koniarova, Zuzana
    Husarova, Romana
    Stefkova, Marie
    Spidlen, Milos
    Statelova, Dagmar
    Janickova, Maria
    Koniarova, Alena
    BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY, 2022, 123 (03): : 185 - 190
  • [45] Treatment effects produced by Frankel appliance in patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusion
    de Almeida, MR
    Henriques, JFC
    de Almeida, RR
    Ursi, W
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2002, 72 (05) : 418 - 425
  • [46] Comparative Evaluation of Soft Tissue Profile Changes with Herbst and Twin Block Appliances in Class II Malocclusion Patients: A Perception Study
    Kannan, Annapurna
    Padmanabhan, Sridevi
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2022, 35 (03) : 173 - 179
  • [47] Occlusal and cephalometric Class II Division I malocclusion severity in patients treated with and without extraction of 2 maxillary premolars
    Janson, Guilherme
    Arnim Graciano, Joao Tadeu
    Castanha Henriques, Jos Fernando
    Roberto de Freitas, Marcos
    Pinzan, Arnaldo
    Pinzan-Vercelino, Cia Regina Maio
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2006, 129 (06) : 759 - 767
  • [48] Treaetment of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion with Extraction of Upper Central Incisors
    Tozlu, Murat
    Oztoprak, Mehmet Oguz
    Sayinsu, Korkmaz
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2011, 24 (02) : 123 - 129
  • [49] Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatment
    Rocha, Andrea Damasceno
    Vieira Freire Casteluci, Cleomaria Evelyn
    Carvalho Ferreira, Fernando Pedrin
    Conti, Ana Claudia
    Almeida, Marcio Rodrigues
    Almeida-Pedrin, Renata Rodrigues
    BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2020, 34
  • [50] Is it possible to distinguish between extraction and nonextraction treatments using facial images of adolescents with skeletal Class II malocclusion?
    Kochenborger, Claudia
    Dias, Vanessa
    Martinelli, Fernando Lima
    Luiz, Ronir Raggio
    de Souza Araujo, Monica Tirre
    JOURNAL OF THE WORLD FEDERATION OF ORTHODONTISTS, 2015, 4 (02) : 52 - 56