Assessing the roughness of titanium dental implants

被引:4
|
作者
Monetta, T. [1 ]
Marchesano, G. [2 ]
Bellucci, F. [1 ]
Lupo, G. [3 ]
Itro, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Studi Federico II, Dipartimento Ingn Chim Mat & Prod Ind, Naples, Italy
[2] Beam Srl, Torre Del Greco, NA, Italy
[3] Seconda Univ Studi Napoli, Dipartimento Multidisciplinare Specialita Med Chi, Naples, Italy
关键词
Titanium; Dental implants; Surface treatments; Roughness; Topography;
D O I
10.1016/S0011-8524(14)70204-1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES. The aim of this study is to enhance the current understanding of the physical meaning of some roughness parameters, and to promote their implementation as routine methodology for assessing the state of surfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS. It is well known that the parameter "average roughness" Ra is often used to characterize the roughness of dental implants, especially in the commercial field, but it does not define the surface state; there are, however, various other roughness parameters defining the device topography in a univocal way. The physical meaning of some roughness parameters, like Sa, Sq, Sku and Ssk has thus been considered. The effect of sandblasting duration (1, 2, 4 and 8 min) and hydrofluoric acid etching, as well as their combined or synergic effect on the surface topography of commercially pure titanium (Ti CP) grade 2 and grade 4, have been investigated in order to highlight the use of those parameters. The experimental results statistical significance has been validated using analysis of variance. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS. We propose to use the roughness parameters Sa, Sq, Sku and Ssk to evaluate dental implant topography. Their implementation shows that: (i) it is possible to distinguish between surfaces that have undergone different treatments; (ii) the experimental results obtained show that sandblasting, performed on Ti CP grade 2 and Ti CP grade 4, under the same experimental conditions, induces completely different topographic features. To compare results obtained by different authors, the above parameters should be used in describing the implants surface state.
引用
收藏
页码:498 / 508
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Surface Modifications and Their Effects on Titanium Dental Implants
    Jemat, A.
    Ghazali, M. J.
    Razali, M.
    Otsuka, Y.
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
  • [32] Fatigue behaviour of titanium dental endosseous implants
    Felli, Ferdinando
    Pilone, Daniela
    Scicutelli, Alessandro
    FRATTURA ED INTEGRITA STRUTTURALE, 2011, (18): : 14 - 22
  • [33] Surface Modification and Functionalities for Titanium Dental Implants
    Sun, Xiao-Di
    Liu, Ting-Ting
    Wang, Qiang-Qiang
    Zhang, Jian
    Cao, Mao-Sheng
    ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2023, 9 (08) : 4442 - 4461
  • [34] Chemical and biological functionalization of titanium for dental implants
    Schliephake, H.
    Scharnweber, D.
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY, 2008, 18 (21) : 2404 - 2414
  • [35] Porous titanium dental implants in primates and humans
    Young, F.A.
    Keller, J.C.
    Engineering in Medicine, 1984, 13 (04): : 203 - 206
  • [36] Formation of Titanium Nanotubes on the Surface of Dental Implants
    Gosteva, E. A.
    Dymnikov, A. B.
    Chichkov, M. V.
    Harka, E.
    Ahmad, M. K.
    PHYSICS OF ATOMIC NUCLEI, 2022, 85 (10) : 1786 - 1788
  • [37] Chemical bioactivation of titanium surface for dental implants
    Gemelli, Enori
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2020, 111 (03) : 265 - 267
  • [38] Study on surface roughness of dental titanium in fluoride ion
    Hwang, KL
    Kim, CW
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1997, 76 (05) : 1190 - 1190
  • [39] The Effects of Superficial Roughness and Design on the Primary Stability of Dental Implants
    dos Santos, Mychelle Vianna
    Elias, Carlos Nelson
    Cavalcanti Lima, Jose Henrique
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (03) : 215 - 223
  • [40] Effect of Surface Roughness on the Properties of Titanium Materials for Bone Implants
    O. K. Kamynina
    K. S. Kravchuk
    M. A. Lazov
    S. M. Pestov
    Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2021, 66 : 1073 - 1078