Cancer Treatment-Induced Bone Loss in women with breast cancer

被引:30
|
作者
Hadji, Peyman [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Marburg, Krankenhaus Nordwest Endocrinol & Reprod Med, Dept Bone Oncol, Steinbacher Hohl 2-26, D-60488 Frankfurt, Germany
来源
BONEKEY REPORTS | 2015年 / 4卷
关键词
D O I
10.1038/bonekey.2015.60
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Osteoporosis is one of the most frequent diseases in postmenopausal women, leading to an increased fracture risk due to the physiologic loss of the bone protective effects of estrogen. Hereby, several risk factors for fracture such as prevalent fracture, low bone mineral density (BMD), age, low body mass index, family history, tendency to falls, smoking, use of SSRIs, glucocorticoid use etc. have been identified. In addition, the further reduction in endogenous estrogens with chemotherapy (CHT), GnRH analoga or aromatase inhibitors (AIs) continuously increases fracture risk. Breast cancer (BC) on the other hand is the most frequent cancer type in women. Recent reports indicate a continuous increased incidence, whereas mortality, due to early diagnosis and treatment improvements, is decreasing. Dependent on specific tumor characteristics, radiation, CHT, antibody treatment as well as endocrine treatment have been included into the adjuvant clinical treatment setting. Some but not all of these cancer-specific treatments interfere with bone turnover, leading to an accelerated bone loss referred to as cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL). Whereas CHT leads to an unspecific increase in bone resorption, AI reduces residual serum endogenous estrogen level and is associated with a decrease in BMD and increased fracture risk. Independent of the type of AI administered, bone loss is 2-3-fold increased compared with healthy, age-matched postmenopausal controls. Therefore, several guidelines have emerged to help managing CTIBL in women with BC including strategies to identify and treat those at highest risk for fractures. This review summarizes the current knowledge on CTIBL and fracturing risk and indicates preventative strategies.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Current management of treatment-induced bone loss in women with breast cancer treated in the United Kingdom
    J E Lester
    D Dodwell
    J M Horsman
    S Mori
    R E Coleman
    British Journal of Cancer, 2006, 94 : 30 - 35
  • [12] Management of cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) in patients with breast cancer or prostate cancer
    Takahashi, Shunji
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL METABOLISM, 2023, 41 (03) : 307 - 316
  • [13] DenosumabIn Cancer Treatment-Induced Bone Loss
    Victoria J. Muir
    Lesley J. Scott
    BioDrugs, 2010, 24 : 379 - 386
  • [14] Management of cancer treatment-induced bone loss
    Robert E. Coleman
    Emma Rathbone
    Janet E. Brown
    Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2013, 9 : 365 - 374
  • [15] Denosumab In Cancer Treatment-Induced Bone Loss
    Muir, Victoria J.
    Scott, Lesley J.
    BIODRUGS, 2010, 24 (06) : 379 - 386
  • [16] Management of cancer treatment-induced bone loss
    Coleman, Robert E.
    Rathbone, Emma
    Brown, Janet E.
    NATURE REVIEWS RHEUMATOLOGY, 2013, 9 (06) : 365 - 374
  • [17] Managing cancer treatment-induced bone loss and osteoporosis in patients with breast or prostate cancer
    Michaud, Laura Boehnke
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2010, 67 (07) : S20 - S30
  • [18] Cancer Treatment-Induced Bone Loss: Role of Denosumab in Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer
    Dhabhar, Boman
    BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY, 2022, 14 : 163 - 173
  • [19] The evolving role of bisphosphonates for the prevention of cancer treatment-induced bone loss in patients with breast cancer
    Theriault, R
    Jakesz, R
    Gnant, M
    Gralow, J
    BONE, 2004, 34 : S90 - S91
  • [20] Cancer treatment-induced bone loss in premenopausal women: A need for therapeutic intervention?
    Hadji, P.
    Gnant, M.
    Body, J. J.
    Bundred, N. J.
    Brufsky, A.
    Coleman, R. E.
    Guise, T. A.
    Lipton, A.
    Aapro, M. S.
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2012, 38 (06) : 798 - 806