Groundwater methane in a potential coal seam gas extraction region

被引:17
|
作者
Atkins, Marnie L. [1 ,2 ]
Santos, Isaac R. [1 ,2 ]
Maher, Damien T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Cross Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Management, Mil Rd, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia
[2] Southern Cross Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Natl Marine Sci Ctr, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia
来源
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Stable isotopes; Aquifer; Baseline research; Geology; Catchment; Hydrochemistry; Coal bed methane; Unconventional gas;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.06.022
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Study region: This study investigates dissolved methane distribution in groundwater from the Richmond River Catchment (New South Wales, Australia) before proposed coal seam gas (CSG, or coal bed methane) development. Study focus: Unconventional gas exploration has rapidly expanded in recent years. However, the impact of these operations on groundwater systems is poorly understood. A total of 91 groundwater samples were analyzed from 6 geological units. Our observations act as regional baseline research prior to CSG extraction and may assist with long term impact assessment. New hydrological insights for the region: Methane was found in all geological units ranging between 0.26 and 4427 mu g L-1 (median 10.68 mu g L-1). Median methane concentrations were highest in chloride-type groundwater (13.26 mu g L-1, n = 58) while bicarbonate-type groundwater had lower concentrations (3.71 mu g L-1). Groundwater from alluvial sediments had significantly higher median methane concentrations (91.46 mu g L-1) than groundwater from both the basalt aquifers (0.7 mu g L-1) and bedrock aquifers (4.63 mu g L-1); indicating geology was a major driver of methane distribution. Methane carbon stable isotope ratios ranged from -90.9%. to -29.5%., suggesting a biogenic origin with some methane oxidation. No significant correlations were observed between methane concentrations and redox indicators (nitrate, manganese, iron and sulphate) except between iron and methane in the Lismore Basalt (r(2) = 0.66, p < 0.001), implying redox conditions were not the main predictor of methane distribution. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:452 / 471
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Numerical Simulation of Gas Extraction in Coal Seam Strengthened by Static Blasting
    Zhang, Xiaoqiang
    Zhou, Fengyuan
    Zou, Jiaxing
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [22] Rational Boreholes Arrangement of Gas Extraction from Unloaded Coal Seam
    Fan, Chaojun
    Li, Sheng
    Zhang, Haohao
    Yang, Zhenhua
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2018, 2018
  • [23] MICROBIAL ORIGIN OF COAL SEAM METHANE
    SMITH, JW
    PALLASER, RJ
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1993, 206 : 79 - GEOC
  • [24] Practice and Drilling Technology of Gas Extraction Borehole in Soft Coal Seam
    Yao, Ningping
    Yin, Xinsheng
    Wang, Yi
    Wang, Li
    Ji, Qianhui
    [J]. 2011 XI'AN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FINE EXPLORATION AND CONTROL OF WATER & GAS IN COAL MINES, 2011, 3 : 53 - 61
  • [25] A Non-Equilibrium multiphysics model for coal seam gas extraction
    Liu, Xingxing
    Chen, Liang
    Sheng, Jinchang
    Liu, Jishan
    [J]. FUEL, 2023, 331
  • [26] A review on transport of coal seam gas and its impact on coalbed methane recovery
    Wang G.G.X.
    Zhang X.
    Wei X.
    Fu X.
    Jiang B.
    Qin Y.
    [J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2011, 5 (2) : 139 - 161
  • [27] New Technology of Mechanical Cavitation in a Coal Seam to Promote Gas Extraction
    Linghu, Jianshe
    Chen, Haidong
    Wang, Liguo
    An, Fenghua
    [J]. ACS OMEGA, 2022, 7 (24): : 21163 - 21171
  • [28] Geochemical tracers associated with methane in aquifers overlying a coal seam gas reservoir
    Pearce, J. K.
    Hofmann, H.
    Baublys, K.
    Cendon, D. I.
    Golding, S. D.
    Herbert, S. J.
    Bhebhe, Z.
    Nguyen, A.
    Hayes, P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2024, 289
  • [29] Analysis of the Difference of Gas Extraction Quantity from Coal Seam under the Influence of Permeability, Gas Pressure, and Buried Depth of Coal Seam: A Case Study
    Wang, Hao
    Wang, Enyuan
    Li, Zhonghui
    Liu, Xiaofei
    Liu, Xiaolei
    Wang, Kan
    [J]. PROCESSES, 2023, 11 (11)
  • [30] Potential infrasonic tremors in coal seam systems: Implications for the prediction of coal and gas outbursts
    Lei, Yang
    Cheng, Yuanping
    Wang, Liang
    Ren, Ting
    Li, Qiuyang
    [J]. FUEL, 2022, 326