RESOLVING CONTRACT DISPUTES BASED ON MISREPRESENTATIONS

被引:3
|
作者
THOMAS, HR
SMITH, GR
PONDERLICK, RM
机构
[1] Pennsylvania Transp. Inst., Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA, 16802
[2] Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Penn State Univ., University Park, PA
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:3(472)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper describes in a clear and understandable way the primary rules of law that are applied to construction contract disputes involving the misrepresentation of concealed or subsurface conditions. The rules are based on the judicial inquiries derived from more than 45 appellate court decisions. The rules are presented in the form of questions to be asked by contractors and contract administrators. The application of these questions should result in a correct determination of the dispute. The questions are organized in an easy-to-understand flow chart. The roles of the soil report and site visit and disclaimers clauses are also explained. The rules were tested using another 10 case decisions. The results show considerable consistency in the law and that the outcome is entirely dependent on the facts.
引用
收藏
页码:472 / 487
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RESOLVING CONTRACT DISPUTES + CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
    COPLAN, N
    [J]. PROGRESSIVE ARCHITECTURE, 1983, 64 (11): : 136 - 136
  • [2] GUIDELINES FOR RESOLVING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT DISPUTES
    LONG, RJ
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1986, 93 (16) : 111 - &
  • [3] RESOLVING GOVERNMENT CONTRACT DISPUTES - WHY NOT ARBITRATE
    HARDY, TS
    CARGILL, RM
    [J]. FEDERAL BAR JOURNAL, 1975, 34 (01): : 1 - 20
  • [4] RESOLVING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT DISPUTES THROUGH ARBITRATION
    AKSEN, G
    [J]. ARBITRATION JOURNAL, 1968, 23 (03): : 141 - 161
  • [5] RESOLVING DISPUTES OVER CONTRACT NOTICE REQUIREMENTS
    THOMAS, HR
    SMITH, GR
    WRIGHT, DE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1990, 116 (04): : 738 - 755
  • [6] RESOLVING CONTRACT DISPUTES BASED ON DIFFERING SITE-CONDITION CLAUSE
    THOMAS, HR
    SMITH, GR
    PONDERLICK, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1992, 118 (04): : 767 - 790
  • [7] Alternative ways of resolving disputes in the field of contract law
    Panov, Alen
    Volkova, Nataliia
    Panova, Liudmyla
    Sichko, Dmytro
    Petrenko, Nataliia
    [J]. AMAZONIA INVESTIGA, 2024, 13 (76): : 258 - 273
  • [8] ARBITRATION - IS IT AN ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF RESOLVING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT DISPUTES
    FABYANSKE, MT
    HALVERSON, ST
    [J]. FORUM-AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, 1980, 16 (02): : 281 - 304
  • [9] Developing a document management model for resolving contract disputes for contractor
    Yang, J. B.
    Huang, K. M.
    [J]. CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES AND SOLUTIONS IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2010, : 723 - 728
  • [10] Solving contract disputes based on the FIDIC contract
    Ran Qinghui
    Ran Liping
    Wang Xuebin
    [J]. Proceedings of 2007 International Conference on Construction & Real Estate Management, Vols 1 and 2, 2007, : 460 - 463