RESOLVING CONTRACT DISPUTES BASED ON DIFFERING SITE-CONDITION CLAUSE

被引:5
|
作者
THOMAS, HR
SMITH, GR
PONDERLICK, RM
机构
[1] Pennsylvania Transp. Inst., The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA
[2] Dept. of Civ. Engrg., The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:4(767)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper describes the important aspects of construction law that relate to differing-site-condition (DSC) disputes and presents a guide for contractors and contract administrators to resolve contract disputes based on the DSC contract clause. Based on research of more than 75 appellate decisions, the paper summarizes the remarkable consistency in case law decisions. Careful examination reveals that courts follow consistent patterns of inquiry. These patterns have been defined in an easy-to-follow flowchart describing the particular inquiry. A narrative containing numerous case citations and synopses accompanies each inquiry. An example, based on an actual case, is included to illustrate the use of the flowchart. The flowchart was tested using 10 other cases, and the outcome using the flowchart was the same as the judicial decision in each instance.
引用
收藏
页码:767 / 790
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RESOLVING CONTRACT DISPUTES BASED ON MISREPRESENTATIONS
    THOMAS, HR
    SMITH, GR
    PONDERLICK, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1992, 118 (03): : 472 - 487
  • [2] RESOLVING CONTRACT DISPUTES + CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
    COPLAN, N
    [J]. PROGRESSIVE ARCHITECTURE, 1983, 64 (11): : 136 - 136
  • [3] GUIDELINES FOR RESOLVING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT DISPUTES
    LONG, RJ
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1986, 93 (16) : 111 - &
  • [4] RESOLVING GOVERNMENT CONTRACT DISPUTES - WHY NOT ARBITRATE
    HARDY, TS
    CARGILL, RM
    [J]. FEDERAL BAR JOURNAL, 1975, 34 (01): : 1 - 20
  • [5] RESOLVING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT DISPUTES THROUGH ARBITRATION
    AKSEN, G
    [J]. ARBITRATION JOURNAL, 1968, 23 (03): : 141 - 161
  • [6] RESOLVING DISPUTES OVER CONTRACT NOTICE REQUIREMENTS
    THOMAS, HR
    SMITH, GR
    WRIGHT, DE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1990, 116 (04): : 738 - 755
  • [7] Litigation Outcome Prediction of Differing Site Condition Disputes through Machine Learning Models
    Mahfouz, Tarek
    Kandil, Amr
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2012, 26 (03) : 298 - 308
  • [8] Alternative ways of resolving disputes in the field of contract law
    Panov, Alen
    Volkova, Nataliia
    Panova, Liudmyla
    Sichko, Dmytro
    Petrenko, Nataliia
    [J]. AMAZONIA INVESTIGA, 2024, 13 (76): : 258 - 273
  • [9] ARBITRATION - IS IT AN ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF RESOLVING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT DISPUTES
    FABYANSKE, MT
    HALVERSON, ST
    [J]. FORUM-AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, 1980, 16 (02): : 281 - 304
  • [10] Developing a map of geologically defined site-condition categories for California
    Wills, C. J.
    Clahan, K. B.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2006, 96 (04) : 1483 - 1501