CRIMINAL OFFENSE: PRO ET CONTRA

被引:0
|
作者
Starostin, Sergey A. [1 ]
机构
[1] MSLA, Moscow, Russia
关键词
criminal offense; administrative offense; crime; criminal liability; administrative responsibility; administrative procedures; tax offenses; budget offenses;
D O I
10.17223/22253513/30/9
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
In article the draft federal law "About Introduction of Amendments to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation in connection with Introduction of a Concept of Criminal Offence" offered by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation is analyzed". Positive and negative consequences of adoption of such decision are considered. Assessment of the impact of the bill on the legislation on administrative offenses is given. At the end of 2017 the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation made the decision to introduce to the State Duma of Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation the draft federal law "About Introduction of Amendments to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation in connection with Introduction of a Concept of Criminal Offence" (further - the bill). But, unfortunately, the bill was not introduced to the State Duma as on it the negative official review of the Government of the Russian Federation in which it considered "inexpedient introduction of the bill in the presented edition" arrived. We suggest to give the following definition of administrative offense is socially dangerous, guilty, illegal act (inaction) which structure is established by exclusively federal laws or laws of territorial subjects of the Russian Federation for which as punishment prevention or an administrative penalty are provided. And it is necessary to set the top limit of such penalty, for example, of 5000 rub. And, at last, the main issue and what will be with the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences? It will not be in the form in which it is today. Those structures which will fall under category criminal offense will be transferred to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Let's notice that it will be no crimes - in today's understanding. Other administrative offenses for which prevention or an administrative penalty are provided will have to are transferred to industry federal laws. These laws have to contain the special sections "Administrative Offences in the Established Field of Activity". The size of a penalty has to be authorized fixed, and executive authorities only to reveal administrative offenses and to make about it protocols. And further the natural or legal entity if agrees, then voluntarily pays a penalty (we will pay attention that Part 3 of Article 35 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation is not violated) if it is not present that addresses to that body which were made by the protocol or in court (also Part 1 of Article 118 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation is not violated). Thus, the harmonious judicial system is built, from "retaliatory" it turns into democratic and fair, courts (it is better if it are administrative courts) will find the full-fledged individuality, having taken away on themselves hearing of cases about criminal offenses. Officials of executive authorities will be exempted from permission burdensome difficult for them put that also liquidates the soil for many corruption manifestations. Citizens, at last, accurately will understand, for as as they can be punished administratively, criminal or other order; load of investigation authorities and inquiries which will be able to concentrate the efforts on investigation of serious delicts will decrease.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 123
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Aortic root widening: "pro et contra"
    Srimurugan, Balaji
    Krishna, Neethu
    Jose, Rajesh
    Gopal, Kirun
    Varma, Praveen Kerala
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 38 (SUPPL 1) : 91 - 100
  • [22] CONFRONTATION AND TOLERANCE OF CULTURES: PRO ET CONTRA
    Kokarevich, M. N.
    Lankin, V. G.
    Lysunets, T. B.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH PARADIGMS TRANSFORMATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCES (RPTSS 2017), 2018, 35 : 799 - 805
  • [23] Daniil Andreev: pro et contra.
    Balla, Olga
    Sadikova-Lansere, G. G.
    NOVYI MIR, 2011, (02): : 197 - 198
  • [24] Debate Criminal Prosecution of Assaultive Psychiatric Patients - Pro & Contra
    Grube, Michael
    PSYCHIATRISCHE PRAXIS, 2013, 40 (01) : 12 - 13
  • [25] Antioxidants in complex therapy of atherosclerosis: Pro et contra
    Lankin, VZ
    Tikhaze, AK
    Belenkov, YN
    KARDIOLOGIYA, 2004, 44 (02) : 72 - 81
  • [26] SMART TECHNOLOGIES IN MODERN CULTURE: PRO ET CONTRA
    Makienko, Marina A.
    Korobeynikova, Larisa A.
    VESTNIK TOMSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA-KULTUROLOGIYA I ISKUSSTVOVEDENIE-TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF CULTURAL STUDIES AND ART HISTORY, 2022, 48 : 99 - 109
  • [27] V.G. Belinsky: pro et contra
    Pavlov, A. T.
    Belinsky, V. G.
    Ermichev, A. A.
    VOPROSY FILOSOFII, 2013, (01) : 176 - 179
  • [28] Microsecond plasma opening switch: pro et contra
    Kokshenev, V. A.
    25TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DISCHARGES AND ELECTRICAL INSULATION IN VACUUM (ISDEIV 2012), 2012, : 437 - 440
  • [29] Information technologies in math education: pro et contra
    Tarasova, O., V
    Savvina, O. A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE MODERN MANAGEMENT TRENDS AND THE DIGITAL ECONOMY: FROM REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT TO GLOBAL ECONOMIC GROWTH (MTDE 2019), 2019, 81 : 567 - 571
  • [30] Progress in Philosophy: pro et contra in Metaphilosophical Studies
    Skripnik, Konstantin D.
    VOPROSY FILOSOFII, 2024, (04) : 97 - 106