STIMULATION CHARACTERISTICS, COMPLICATIONS, AND EFFICACY OF SPINAL-CORD STIMULATION SYSTEMS IN PATIENTS WITH REFRACTORY ANGINA - A PROSPECTIVE FEASIBILITY STUDY

被引:0
|
作者
DEJONGSTE, MJL
NAGELKERKE, D
HOOYSCHUUR, CM
JOURNEE, HL
MEYLER, PWJ
STAAL, MJ
DEJONGE, P
LIE, KI
机构
[1] MEDTRONIC INC, EINDHOVEN, NETHERLANDS
[2] UNIV GRONINGEN HOSP, DEPT NEUROSURG, 9700 RB GRONINGEN, NETHERLANDS
[3] UNIV GRONINGEN HOSP, DEPT ANESTHESIOL, 9700 RB GRONINGEN, NETHERLANDS
来源
关键词
ANGINA; FOLLOW-UP SPINAL CORD STIMULATION CHARACTERISTICS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: In a prospective study with a 1-year follow-up we evaluated: (1) the feasibility of a method for the adjustment of spinal cord stimulator (SCS) parameters, (2) complications of SCS, and (3) efficacy of SCS. Methods: In patients receiving an SCS for severe angina unresponsive to standard therapies, SCS characteristics were evaluated within 1 week and at 4, 14, 26, and 52 weeks after SCS treatment. Step-by-step adjustment of pulse output parameters was performed at the electrode configuration at which paresthesias occurred (''sensory threshold''), covered the anginal area (''adjusted setting''), or provoked pain (''motor threshold''). In addition, the number of anginal attacks and intake of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) tablets were recorded at regular intervals. Results: Twenty-two patients with either a bipolar (14) or a unipolar (8) system were evaluated. In the 14 patients with bipolar systems, alteration in paresthesias required 26 reprogrammings of the configuration. in the eight patients with bipolar systems who completed the followup without lead dislocation, the mean ''sensory threshold'' was 3.3 V (1.7-5.6), the mean ''adjusted stimulation'' output was 4.5 V (2.8-7.6), and the mean ''motor threshold'' was 4.9 V (2.8-7.7) after 4 weeks SCS. The mean stimulation duration per 24 hours was 14.2% (5%-24%), and the mean standardized impedance was 821 Omega (748-893) after 4 weeks SCS. The unipolar group demonstrated comparable results. After 1-year follow-up the parameters had not changed significantly. During the I-year followup, 6 of 22 patients experienced lead dislocation that required surgery. In all patients, anginal attacks (P < 0.003) and GTN intake (P < 0.005) were reduced significantly with SCS. The effect lasted during the 1 year. Conclusions: During a 1-year follow-up, the stimulation parameters did not change significantly in the 16 patients without lead dislocations. Our standardized method appears to be feasible for followup of SCS. Moreover, SCS seems to be an effective adjuvant therapy for intractable angina, despite a relatively frequent dislocation of the electrode.
引用
收藏
页码:1751 / 1760
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy for Patients With Refractory Angina Who Are Not Candidates for Revascularization
    Zipes, Douglas P.
    Svorkdal, Nelson
    Berman, Daniel
    Boortz-Marx, Richard
    Henry, Timothy
    Lerman, Amir
    Ross, Edgar
    Turner, Michael
    Irwin, Christopher
    NEUROMODULATION, 2012, 15 (06): : 550 - 559
  • [22] EPIDURAL SPINAL-CORD STIMULATION IN SPASTIC SPINAL-CORD INJURY PATIENTS
    CAMPOS, RJ
    DIMITRIJEVIC, MR
    SHARKEY, PC
    SHERWOOD, AM
    APPLIED NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 50 (1-6) : 453 - 454
  • [23] Spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina pectoris: A shocking experience
    Murphy, PM
    MacSullivan, R
    NEUROMODULATION, 2004, 7 (04): : 246 - 248
  • [24] Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Refractory Angina: A Case Report
    Holmgren, Bryce C.
    Khan, Talal W.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2017, 124 : 475 - 476
  • [25] Clinical effects of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: Results from a prospective Italian registry
    Lanza, GA
    Di Pede, F
    Zuin, G
    Roman, M
    Rapati, D
    Circo, A
    Cardano, P
    Bellocci, F
    Alfieri, O
    Santini, M
    Masan, A
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (06) : 371A - 371A
  • [26] Spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina pectoris patients:: Data on clinical outcome from the Prospective Italian Registry
    Di Pede, F
    Zuin, G
    Greco, S
    Rapati, D
    Romanò, M
    Neri, G
    Circo, A
    Capucci, A
    Lanza, G
    Stritoni, P
    Dato, GMA
    Marangoni, E
    Maritano, M
    Barbiero, M
    Dragagno, G
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 37 (02) : 328S - 329S
  • [27] Efficacy, safety, mechanisms and adjustment of settings of spinal cord stimulation devices in patients with chronic refractory angina pectoris
    DeJongste, MJL
    Durenkamp, A
    Elands, A
    Staal, MJ
    MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC PAIN: THE USE OF THE TOOLS OF THE TRADE, 2000, : 547 - 554
  • [28] Spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina pectoris:: a retrospective analysis of efficacy and cost-benefit
    Yu, W
    Maru, F
    Edner, M
    Hellström, K
    Kahan, T
    Persson, H
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2004, 15 (01) : 31 - 37
  • [29] The Use of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire in Patients Who Underwent Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina Pectoris
    Langford, Brendan
    Hunt, Christine
    Lerman, Amir
    Mauck, William D.
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (04) : 1005 - 1009
  • [30] Clinical outcome of patients treated with spinal cord stimulation for therapeutically refractory angina pectoris
    TenVaarwerk, IAM
    Jessurun, GAJ
    DeJongste, MJL
    Andersen, C
    Mannheimer, C
    Eliasson, T
    Tadema, W
    Staal, MJ
    HEART, 1999, 82 (01) : 82 - 88