Expectant Versus Surgical Management of Early Pregnancy Miscarriages- A Prospective Study

被引:5
|
作者
Sajan, Reshma [1 ]
Pulikkathodi, Mumtaz [2 ]
Vahab, Abdul [2 ]
Kunjitty, Valsan Mankara [3 ]
Imrana, Hassan Sheikh [2 ]
机构
[1] Govt Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Palakkad, Kerala, India
[2] MES Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Perinthalmanna, Kerala, India
[3] KMCT Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Calicut, Kerala, India
关键词
Anembryonic pregnancy; Early fetal demise; Expectant management; Incomplete miscarriage;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2015/14803.6613
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Surgical, medical and expectant management are the various options available to manage early pregnancy miscarriages; each with its own merits and demerits. In the last two decades, the efficacy and safety of expectant management which allows for the spontaneous passage of retained products of conception has been studied and confirmed. Aim: To compare the safety and efficacy of expectant management of early pregnancy miscarriages with surgical uterine evacuation. Materials and Methods : The prospective study conducted in tertiary care centre for 5 years, included 212 patients with USG confirmed pregnancy miscarriages of less than 13 weeks, who were allocated to expectant management (Cases, n=112) and surgical evacuation (Control, n=100). Patients were allocated for expectant management as outpatients for 2 weeks, without any intervention till they had spontaneous complete miscarriage which was confirmed by sonography. Those who failed to do so, underwent a planned surgical uterine evacuation. Emergency admission and evacuation was done, if the patients became symptomatic in the waiting period. Patients allocated to surgical group underwent planned surgical evacuation once diagnosed. Success rate and complications like emergency evacuation, vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, limitation of physical activity and patient satisfaction were assessed. Both groups were followed up for 6 more weeks. Statistical analysis was done with Z-test. Results: Success rate of the expectant management was 71% as against 97% in surgical group. Severe vaginal bleeding was comparable (5% in both groups), 8% of expectant had severe abdominal pain versus 4% in surgical group. Unplanned admissions and emergency evacuation rate was high in expectant 9% against 1% in surgical group. Twenty one percent patients in expectant and 17% patients in surgical group experienced limitation of physical activity. Overall patient satisfaction rate was comparable (74% in expectant 80% in surgical group). Conclusion: Expectant management of miscarriages has a success rate of 71%. Compared to surgical management, abdominal pain, unplanned admissions, emergency evacuation and limitation of physical activity were more in expectant group. Success rate can be improved and complications can be minimised with proper patient selection and counseling.
引用
收藏
页码:QC06 / QC09
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The METEX study: Methotrexate versus expectant management in women with ectopic pregnancy: A randomised controlled trial
    van Mello N.M.
    Mol F.
    Adriaanse A.H.
    Boss E.A.
    Dijkman A.B.
    Doornbos J.P.R.
    Emanuel M.H.
    Friederich J.
    van der Leeuw-Harmsen L.
    Lips J.P.
    van Santbrink E.J.P.
    Verhoeve H.R.
    Visser H.
    Ankum W.M.
    van der Veen F.
    Mol B.W.
    Hajenius P.J.
    BMC Women's Health, 8 (1)
  • [22] Medical management of miscarriages on an outpatient basis in a busy early pregnancy unit
    Newman, M.
    Spiliopoulos, D.
    Awala, A.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 : 532 - 532
  • [23] Methotrexate versus expectant management in ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis
    Ahmed Kunwer Naveed
    Muhammad Umair Anjum
    Ali Hassan
    Sumbal Nasir Mahmood
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2022, 305 : 547 - 553
  • [24] Systematic Review: Elective Induction of Labor Versus Expectant Management of Pregnancy
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Sundaram, Vandana
    Kaimal, Anjali J.
    Gienger, Allison
    Cheng, Yvonne W.
    McDonald, Kathryn M.
    Shaffer, Brian L.
    Owens, Douglas K.
    Bravata, Dena M.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 151 (04) : 252 - W63
  • [25] Planned early delivery versus expectant management for monoamniotic twins
    Shub, Alexis
    Walker, Susan P.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (04):
  • [26] Clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in twin pregnancy
    Suzuki, S
    Otsubo, Y
    Sawa, R
    Yoneyama, Y
    Araki, T
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2000, 49 (01) : 24 - 27
  • [27] Methotrexate versus expectant management in ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis
    Naveed, Ahmed Kunwer
    Anjum, Muhammad Umair
    Hassan, Ali
    Mahmood, Sumbal Nasir
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2022, 305 (03) : 547 - 553
  • [28] Surgical intervention versus expectant management for endometrial polyps in subfertile women
    Jayaprakasan, Kannamannadiar
    Polanski, Lukasz
    Sahu, Banchhita
    Thornton, Jim G.
    Raine-Fenning, Nick
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (08):
  • [29] An Update on Surgical versus Expectant Management of Ovarian Endometriomas in Infertile Women
    Keyhan, Sanaz
    Hughes, Claude
    Price, Thomas
    Muasher, Suheil
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
  • [30] Quality of life and acceptability of medical versus surgical management of early pregnancy failure
    Harwood, B.
    Nansel, T.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (04) : 501 - 508