INDIGENOUS WELL-BEING IN AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT POLICY CONTEXTS

被引:0
|
作者
Grieves, Vicki [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Dept Gender & Cultural Studies, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1177/117718010600300101
中图分类号
C95 [民族学、文化人类学];
学科分类号
0304 ; 030401 ;
摘要
This paper is designed to be the beginning of a dialogue about Indigenous well-being in government policy contexts in Australia rather than a definitive analysis. It arises from a larger report prepared for the New South Wales (NSW) Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC; Grieves, 2006). The Cultural Heritage Branch seeks to analyse current government policy approaches to Indigenous Australian well-being to establish where Aboriginal cultural heritage activities are included and can be included. The major project, of which the large report is a component, addresses the research question: How does cultural heritage, as an activity field, enhance Aboriginal well-being and how can cultural notions of well-being be applied to government policies concerned with Aboriginal people in NSW? Cultural heritage has been defined as 'consisting of places and objects which are valued by the community. As well as buildings and landscapes, it includes objects representing traditional ways of life and symbols of events which have touched communities' (English & Gay, 2005). Importantly, Indigenous Australians also have a unique heritage as the first people of Australia, which is acknowledged by the Australian Government as Native Title. Moreover, Indigenous Australian cultural heritage includes intangible factors, which have their basis in ways of being and doing, and also expressed in oral and performative expression, for example, Indigenous Australian languages, music and dance that connect people to the land. This article includes findings about Commonwealth Government policies relating to well-being, with a focus on: Indigenous Australian culture and heritage; the alignment between government's well-being policies (and relevant legislation); the nature of Indigenous Australian community participation in this area; and consideration of the conceptual framework that underpins the current government policy framework.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 25
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Well-Being Policy: What Standard of Well-Being?
    Haybron, Daniel
    Tiberius, Valerie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 1 (04) : 712 - 733
  • [2] PARTNERS AS CONTEXTS FOR HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
    不详
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2015, 55 : 505 - 505
  • [3] The health and well-being of Indigenous youth
    Kirmayer, Laurence J.
    [J]. ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2015, 104 (01) : 2 - 4
  • [4] GEOGRAPHIC DIFFERENCES IN SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING AMONG INDIGENOUS AND NON-INDIGENOUS AUSTRALIAN ADOLESCENTS AND ADULTS
    Tomyn, Adrian J.
    Mellor, David
    Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Matthew
    Cummins, Robert A.
    Tanton, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 45 (01) : 81 - 99
  • [5] Theories of well-being and well-being policy: a view from methodology
    Fumagalli, Roberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC METHODOLOGY, 2021, 28 (01) : 124 - 133
  • [6] Subjective Well-Being and Policy
    Bruno S. Frey
    Jana Gallus
    [J]. Topoi, 2013, 32 : 207 - 212
  • [7] Well-being in metrics and policy
    Graham, Carol
    Laffan, Kate
    Pinto, Sergio
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2018, 362 (6412) : 287 - 288
  • [8] Subjective Well-Being and Policy
    Frey, Bruno S.
    Gallus, Jana
    [J]. TOPOI-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY, 2013, 32 (02): : 207 - 212
  • [9] Well-Being for Public Policy
    Haybron, Daniel M.
    [J]. ETHICS, 2013, 124 (01) : 218 - 227
  • [10] The Well-Being of Australian Service Mothers
    Davy, Carol P.
    Lorimer, Michelle
    McFarlane, Alexander
    Hodson, Stephanie
    Crompvoets, Samantha
    Lawrence-Wood, Ellie
    Neuhaus, Susan J.
    [J]. WOMEN & HEALTH, 2015, 55 (07) : 737 - 753