JUDICIAL RETENTION ELECTIONS AND JUDICIAL METHOD - A RETROSPECTIVE ON THE CALIFORNIA RETENTION ELECTION OF 1986

被引：0

|

作者：

THOMPSON, RS

机构：

来源：

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW | 1988年 / 61卷 / 06期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：2007 / 2064

页数：58

相关论文

共 45 条

[41] A critique of the current method of scheduling presidential primary elections and a discussion of potential judicial challenges
Steinberg, MS
[J]. GEORGE WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW, 2001, 69 (03) : 453 - 476
[42] Reinforcing New Jersey's bench: Power tools for remodeling senatorial courtesy and refinishing judicial selection and retention
Martin, RJ
[J]. RUTGERS LAW REVIEW, 2000, 53 (01) : 1 - 90
[43] Majority rules except in New Mexico: Constitutional and policy concerns raised by New Mexico's supermajority requirement for judicial retention
Saucedo, SE
[J]. BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2006, 86 (01) : 173 - 226
[44] Non judicial rights review of counterterrorism policies: The role of fundamental rights in the making of the counterterrorism database and the data retention legislation in Germany
Lang, Andrej
[J]. ICON-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 2021, 19 (02): : 634 - 664
[45] Legislative genesis and judicial death of a directive: The European Court of Justice invalidated the data retention directive (2006/24/EC) thereby creating a sustained period of legal uncertainty about the validity of national laws which enacted it
Tracol, Xavier
[J]. COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW, 2014, 30 (06) : 736 - 746

← 1 2 3 4 5 →