An updated systematic review and meta-analysis on impedance threshold devices in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation

被引:0
|
作者
Biondi-Zoccai, G. [1 ]
Abbate, A. [2 ]
Landoni, G. [3 ]
Zangrillo, A. [3 ]
Vincent, J. L. [4 ]
D'Ascenzo, F. [5 ]
Frati, G. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Medico Surg Sci & Biotechnol, Corso Repubbl 79, I-04100 Latina, Italy
[2] VCU Pauley Heart Ctr, Richmond, VA USA
[3] IRCCS San Raffaele Sci Inst, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Erasme Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Brussels, Belgium
[5] Univ Turin, Div Cardiol, Dept Internal Med, Turin, Italy
[6] IRCCS Neuromed, Dept AngioCardioNeurol, Pozzilli, Italy
关键词
active compression-decompression; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; impedance threshold device; return of spontaneous circulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Uncertainty persists on the clinical impact of impedance threshold devices in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We conducted an updated systematic review on impedance threshold devices. Methods: Several databases were searched for studies testing the effectiveness of impedance threshold devices in patients with cardiac arrest. The primary endpoint was long-term survival. Results: Seven trials (11,254 patients) were included. In 4 studies (2,284 patients) impedance threshold devices were used with active compression-decompression-cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and in the others alone. Overall, impedance threshold devices did not impact on the rate of return of spontaneous circulation (odds ratio= 1.17 [0.96-1.43], p= 0.114), favorable neurologic outcome (odds ratio= 1.56 [0.97-2.50], p= 0.065), or long-term survival (odds ratio= 1.22 [0.94-1.58], p= 0.127). These analyses were fraught with heterogeneity (respectively, p= 0.055, p= 0.236, and p= 0.011) and inconsistency (respectively, I-squared= 51%, I-squared= 27%, and I-squared= 67%). Exploratory analysis showed that combined use of impedance threshold devices with active compression-decompression significantly increased the likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation (odds ratio= 1.19 [1.00-1.40], p= 0.045), favorable neurologic outcome (odds ratio= 1.60 [1.142.25], p= 0.006), and long-term survival (odds ratio= 1.52 [1.11-2.08], p= 0.009). The favorable impact of the interaction between impedance threshold devices and active compression-decompression was also confirmed at meta-regression analysis (respectively, b= 0.195 [0.004-0.387], p= 0.045, b= 0.500 [0.079-0.841], p= 0.018, b= 0.413 [0.063-0.764], p= 0.021). Conclusions: The evidence base on impedance threshold devices is apparently inconclusive, with a neutral impact on clinically relevant outcomes. However, exploratory analysis focusing on the combined use of impedance threshold devices with active compression-decompression suggests that this combo treatment may be useful to improve patient prognosis.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 113
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The impedance threshold valve for adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a review of the literature
    Pirracchio, Romain
    Payen, Didier
    Plaisance, Patrick
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2007, 13 (03) : 280 - 286
  • [32] Fluid Restriction Vs Higher Volume Resuscitation in Patients With Septic Shock: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Wacher, N.
    Moreno, Y. B.
    Marcano, C. B.
    Escalona, I.
    Kosseifi, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 207
  • [33] Survival of pediatric patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bimerew, Melaku
    Wondmieneh, Adam
    Gedefaw, Getnet
    Gebremeskel, Teshome
    Demis, Asmamaw
    Getie, Addisu
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2021, 47 (01)
  • [34] Survival of pediatric patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Melaku Bimerew
    Adam Wondmieneh
    Getnet Gedefaw
    Teshome Gebremeskel
    Asmamaw Demis
    Addisu Getie
    Italian Journal of Pediatrics, 47
  • [35] The effect of vibrational devices on pain in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chawla, Shilpa
    Rodrigues, Lishoy
    Deshmukh, Shailesh
    Vajarekar, Gaury Anant
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL DENTAL RESEARCH ORGANIZATION, 2022, 14 (02) : 110 - 119
  • [36] Do cardiopulmonary resuscitation real-time audiovisual feedback devices improve patient outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sood, Nitish
    Sangari, Anish
    Goyal, Arnav
    Sun, Christina
    Horinek, Madison
    Hauger, Joseph Andy
    Perry, Lane
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 15 (10): : 531 - 541
  • [37] Thrombus aspiration in STEMI patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Meneguz-Moreno, Rafael A.
    Ribamar Costa, J., Jr.
    Oki, Fabio H.
    Costa, Ricardo A.
    Abizaid, Alexandre
    MINERVA CARDIOANGIOLOGICA, 2017, 65 (06): : 648 - 658
  • [38] Cardioneuroablation in patients with vasovagal syncope: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Prata, Alonzo Armani
    Katsuyama, Eric
    Scardini, Pedro
    Antunes, Vanio
    Granja, Joao
    Coan, Ana Carolina
    Fukunaga, Christian
    Mateos, Juan Carlos Pachon
    HEART RHYTHM, 2025, 22 (02) : 526 - 535
  • [39] Review Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest: An updated systematic review
    Holmberg, Mathias J.
    Granfeldt, Asger
    Guerguerian, Anne-Marie
    Sandroni, Claudio
    Hsu, Cindy H.
    Gardner, Ryan M.
    Lind, Peter C.
    Eggertsen, Mark A.
    Johannsen, Cecilie M.
    Andersen, Lars W.
    RESUSCITATION, 2023, 182
  • [40] Risk of cancer in acromegaly patients: An updated meta-analysis and systematic review
    Xiao, Zhehao
    Xiao, Pingping
    Wang, Yong
    Fang, Chen
    Li, Yong
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (11):