An updated systematic review and meta-analysis on impedance threshold devices in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation

被引:0
|
作者
Biondi-Zoccai, G. [1 ]
Abbate, A. [2 ]
Landoni, G. [3 ]
Zangrillo, A. [3 ]
Vincent, J. L. [4 ]
D'Ascenzo, F. [5 ]
Frati, G. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Medico Surg Sci & Biotechnol, Corso Repubbl 79, I-04100 Latina, Italy
[2] VCU Pauley Heart Ctr, Richmond, VA USA
[3] IRCCS San Raffaele Sci Inst, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Erasme Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Brussels, Belgium
[5] Univ Turin, Div Cardiol, Dept Internal Med, Turin, Italy
[6] IRCCS Neuromed, Dept AngioCardioNeurol, Pozzilli, Italy
关键词
active compression-decompression; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; impedance threshold device; return of spontaneous circulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Uncertainty persists on the clinical impact of impedance threshold devices in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We conducted an updated systematic review on impedance threshold devices. Methods: Several databases were searched for studies testing the effectiveness of impedance threshold devices in patients with cardiac arrest. The primary endpoint was long-term survival. Results: Seven trials (11,254 patients) were included. In 4 studies (2,284 patients) impedance threshold devices were used with active compression-decompression-cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and in the others alone. Overall, impedance threshold devices did not impact on the rate of return of spontaneous circulation (odds ratio= 1.17 [0.96-1.43], p= 0.114), favorable neurologic outcome (odds ratio= 1.56 [0.97-2.50], p= 0.065), or long-term survival (odds ratio= 1.22 [0.94-1.58], p= 0.127). These analyses were fraught with heterogeneity (respectively, p= 0.055, p= 0.236, and p= 0.011) and inconsistency (respectively, I-squared= 51%, I-squared= 27%, and I-squared= 67%). Exploratory analysis showed that combined use of impedance threshold devices with active compression-decompression significantly increased the likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation (odds ratio= 1.19 [1.00-1.40], p= 0.045), favorable neurologic outcome (odds ratio= 1.60 [1.142.25], p= 0.006), and long-term survival (odds ratio= 1.52 [1.11-2.08], p= 0.009). The favorable impact of the interaction between impedance threshold devices and active compression-decompression was also confirmed at meta-regression analysis (respectively, b= 0.195 [0.004-0.387], p= 0.045, b= 0.500 [0.079-0.841], p= 0.018, b= 0.413 [0.063-0.764], p= 0.021). Conclusions: The evidence base on impedance threshold devices is apparently inconclusive, with a neutral impact on clinically relevant outcomes. However, exploratory analysis focusing on the combined use of impedance threshold devices with active compression-decompression suggests that this combo treatment may be useful to improve patient prognosis.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 113
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EFFECT OF IMPEDANCE THRESHOLD DEVICES ON CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION: AN UPDATED META-ANALYSIS
    Ma, Li
    Xiong, Binghong
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (01) : 118 - 118
  • [2] Impact of impedance threshold devices on cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
    Cabrini, Luca
    Beccaria, Paolo
    Landoni, Giovanni
    Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe G. L.
    Sheiban, Imad
    Cristofolini, Marta
    Fochi, Oliviero
    Maj, Giulia
    Zangrillo, Alberto
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (05) : 1625 - 1632
  • [3] Brain Injury and Neurologic Outcome in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cho, Sung-Min
    Rice, Cory J.
    Geocadin, Romergryko
    Migdady, Ibrahim
    CIRCULATION, 2019, 140
  • [4] Brain Injury and Neurologic Outcome in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Migdady, Ibrahim
    Rice, Cory
    Deshpande, Abhishek
    Hernandez, Adrian V.
    Price, Carrie
    Whitman, Glenn J.
    Geocadin, Romergryko G.
    Cho, Sung-Min
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (07) : E611 - E619
  • [5] Use of backboards in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Paganini, Matteo
    Mormando, Giulia
    Carfagna, Fabio
    Ingrassia, Pier Luigi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 28 (03) : 180 - 188
  • [6] Outcomes of Pediatric Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Farhat, Abdelaziz
    Ling, Ryan Ruiyang
    Jenks, Christopher L.
    Poon, Wynne Hsing
    Yang, Isabelle Xiaorui
    Li, Xilong
    Liu, Yulun
    Darnell-Bowens, Cindy
    Ramanathan, Kollengode
    Thiagarajan, Ravi R.
    Raman, Lakshmi
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (04) : 682 - 692
  • [7] Efficacy of acupuncture for cardiopulmonary cerebral resuscitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Yunlan
    Ren, Mengjuan
    Kuang, Zhuoran
    Luo, Xufei
    Li, Huishan
    Zhang, Yikai
    Wen, Wanxin
    Cai, Yefeng
    Ni, Xiaojia
    Chen, Yaolong
    INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [8] Efficacy of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation compared to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation for adult cardiac arrest patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chiwon Ahn
    Wonhee Kim
    Youngsuk Cho
    Kyu-Sun Choi
    Bo-Hyoung Jang
    Tae Ho Lim
    Scientific Reports, 6
  • [9] The effect of perioperative immunonutrition on patients undergoing esophagectomy: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis
    Zhou, Yun
    Li, Tian -Tian
    Tan, Zhi-Ming
    Yang, Zhi-liang
    Yang, Chi -Fen
    Wang, Zheng
    NUTRICION HOSPITALARIA, 2023, 40 (04) : 839 - 847
  • [10] Survival in cancer patients undergoing in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A meta-analysis
    Reisfield, Gary M.
    Wallace, Susannah Kish
    Munsell, Mark F.
    Webb, Fern J.
    Alvarez, Edgar R.
    Wilson, George R.
    RESUSCITATION, 2006, 71 (02) : 152 - 160